subproject-maintainership: Clarify the referenced preconditions
The text left the reader to their own devices to determine what was
meant. Avoid that by adding a link. Avoid further confusion by
correcting "above" to "below", which was a defect in the original
submission.
Change-Id: Idd40322f228696a57f63be6b5f2999d419038ed0
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>
diff --git a/process/subproject-maintainership.md b/process/subproject-maintainership.md
index 274813e..4bd682d 100644
--- a/process/subproject-maintainership.md
+++ b/process/subproject-maintainership.md
@@ -18,12 +18,12 @@
1. A complaint is raised to the TOF about lack of forward progress in a
subproject
-2. The TOF validates the complaint against the pre-conditions and definitions
- described below
+2. The TOF validates the complaint against the
+ [pre-conditions and definitions described below](#defining-and-determining-unresponsiveness)
1. The complaint is valid if all the pre-conditions are met and the behavior
- exceeds the limits outlined in the definitions above
+ exceeds the limits outlined in the definitions below
2. The complaint is partially valid if the pre-conditions are met and but the
- behaviour does not exceed the limits outlined in the definitions above
+ behaviour does not exceed the limits outlined in the definitions below
3. The complaint is invalid if the pre-conditions are not met
3. If the complaint is valid the TOF notifies the current maintainers of the
impending addition of maintainers