Contributing to OpenBMC

Here's a little guide to working on OpenBMC. This document will always be a work-in-progress, feel free to propose changes.

Structure

OpenBMC has quite a modular structure, consisting of small daemons with a limited set of responsibilities. These communicate over D-Bus with other components, to implement the complete BMC system.

The BMC's interfaces to the external world are typically through a separate daemon, which then translates those requests to D-Bus messages.

These separate projects are then compiled into the final system by the overall 'openbmc' build infrastructure.

For future development, keep this design in mind. Components' functionality should be logically grouped, and keep related parts together where it makes sense.

Starting out

If you're starting out with OpenBMC, you may want to take a look at the issues tagged with 'bitesize'. These are fixes or enhancements that don't require extensive knowledge of the OpenBMC codebase, and are easier for a newcomer to start working with.

Check out that list here:

https://github.com/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+user%3Aopenbmc+label%3Abitesize

If you need further details on any of these issues, feel free to add comments.

Performing code reviews is another good way to get started. Go to https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz and click on the "all" and "open" menu items, or if you are interested in a particular repository, for example "bmcweb", type "status:open project:openbmc/bmcweb" into the search bar and press the "search" button. Then select a review. Remember to be positive and add value with every review comment.

Coding style

Components of the OpenBMC sources should have a consistent style. If the source is coming from another project, we choose to follow the existing style of the upstream project. Otherwise, conventions are chosen based on the language.

Python

Python source should all conform to PEP8. This style is well established within the Python community and can be verified with the 'pycodestyle' tool.

https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/

Python Formatting

If a repository has a setup.cfg file present in its root directory, then CI will automatically verify the Python code meets the pycodestyle requirements. This enforces PEP 8 standards on all Python code.

OpenBMC standards for Python match with PEP 8 so in general, a blank setup.cfg file is all that's needed. If so desired, an enforcement of 80 (vs. the default 79) chars is fine as well:

[pycodestyle]
max-line-length = 80

By default, pycodestyle does not enforce the following rules: E121, E123, E126, E133, E226, E241, E242, E704, W503, and W504. These rules are ignored because they are not unanimously accepted and PEP 8 does not enforce them. It is at the repository maintainer's discretion as to whether to enforce the aforementioned rules. These rules can be enforced by adding the following to the setup.cfg:

[pycodestyle]
ignore= NONE

JavaScript

We follow the Google JavaScript Style Guide.

Example .clang-format

HTML/CSS

We follow the Google HTML/CSS Style Guide.

C

For C code, we typically use the Linux coding style, which is documented at:

http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst

In short:

  • Indent with tabs instead of spaces, set at 8 columns

  • 80-column lines

  • Opening braces on the end of a line, except for functions

This style can mostly be verified with 'astyle' as follows:

astyle --style=linux --indent=tab=8 --indent=force-tab=8

C++

See C++ Style and Conventions.

Planning changes

If you are making a nontrivial change, you should plan how to introduce it to the OpenBMC development community.

If you are planning a new function, you should get agreement that your change will be accepted. As early as you can, introduce the change via the OpenBMC IRC channel or email list to start the discussion. You may find a better way to do what you need.

Stage your change in small pieces to make them easy to review:

  • If your change has a specification, sketch out your ideas first and work to get that accepted before completing the details.
  • Work at most a few days before seeking review.
  • Commit and review header files before writing code.
  • Commit and review each implementation module separately.

Make each commit simple to review.

Submitting changes

We use git for almost everything. Changes should be sent as patches to their relevant source tree - or a git pull request for convenience.

Each commit should be a self-contained logical unit, and smaller patches are usually better. However, if there is no clear division, a larger patch is okay. During development, it can be useful to consider how your change can be submitted as logical units.

Each commit is expected to be tested. The expectation of testing may vary from subproject to subproject, but will typically include running all applicable automated tests and performing manual testing. Each commit should be tested separately, even if they are submitted together (an exception is when commits to different projects depend on each other).

Commit messages are important. They should describe why the change is needed, and what effects it will have on the system. Do not describe the actual code change made by the patch; that's what the patch itself is for.

Use your full name for contributions, and include a "Signed-off-by" line, to indicate that you agree to the Developer's Certificate of Origin (see below).

Commit messages should include a "Tested" field describing how you tested the code changes in the patch. Example:

    Tested: I ran unit tests with "make check" (added 2 new tests) and manually
    tested on Witherspoon that Foo daemon no longer crashes at boot.

Ensure that your patch doesn't change unrelated areas. Be careful of accidental whitespace changes - this makes review unnecessarily difficult.

The guidelines in the Linux kernel are very useful:

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submit-checklist.html

Your contribution will generally need to be reviewed before being accepted.

Submitting changes via Gerrit server

The OpenBMC Gerrit server supports GitHub credentials, its link is:

https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/#/q/status:open

One time only: Execute one of the OpenBMC Contributor License Agreements:

If you work for someone, consider asking them to execute the corporate CLA. This allows other contributors that work for your employer to skip the CLA signing process.

After signing a CLA, send it to openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org.

One time setup: Login to the WebUI with your GitHub credentials and verify on your account Settings that your SSH keys were imported:

https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/#/settings/

Most repositories are supported by the Gerrit server, the current list can be found under Projects -> List:

https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/#/admin/projects/

If you're going to be working with Gerrit often, it's useful to create an SSH host block in ~/.ssh/config. Ex:

Host openbmc.gerrit
        Hostname gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz
        Port 29418
        User your_github_id

From your OpenBMC git repository, add a remote to the Gerrit server, where 'openbmc_repo' is the current git repository you're working on, such as phosphor-rest-server, and 'openbmc.gerrit' is the name of the Host previously added:

git remote add gerrit ssh://openbmc.gerrit/openbmc/openbmc_repo

Gerrit uses Change-Ids to identify commits that belong to the same review. Configure your git repository to automatically add a Change-Id to your commit messages. The steps are:

gitdir=$(git rev-parse --git-dir)

scp -p -P 29418 openbmc.gerrit:hooks/commit-msg ${gitdir}/hooks

To submit a change set, commit your changes, and push to the Gerrit server, where 'gerrit' is the name of the remote added with the git remote add command:

git push gerrit HEAD:refs/for/master

Gerrit will show you the URL link to your review. You can also find your reviews from the OpenBMC Gerrit server search bar or menu (All > Open, or My > Changes).

Invite reviewers to review your changes. Each OpenBMC repository has a MAINTAINERS file which lists required reviewers who are subject matter experts. Those reviewers may add additional reviewers. To add reviewers from the Gerrit web page, click the "add reviewers" icon by the list of reviewers.

You are expected to respond to all comments. And remember to use the "reply" button to publish your replies for others to see.

The review results in the proposed change being accepted, rejected for rework, or abandoned. When you re-work your change, remember to use git commit --amend so Gerrit handles the update as a new patch of the same review.

Each repository is governed by a small group of maintainers who are leaders with expertise in their area. They are responsible for reviewing changes and maintaining the quality of the code. You'll need a maintainer to accept your change, and they will look to the other reviewers for guidance. When accepted, your change will merge into the OpenBMC project.

References to non-public resources

Code and commit messages shall not refer to companies' internal documents or systems (including bug trackers). Other developers may not have access to these, making future maintenance difficult.

Code contributed to OpenBMC must build from the publicly available sources, with no dependencies on non-public resources (URLs, repositories, etc).

Best practices for D-Bus interfaces

  • New D-Bus interfaces should be reusable

  • Type signatures should and use the simplest types possible, appropriate for the data passed. For example, don't pass numbers as ASCII strings.

  • D-Bus interfaces are defined in the phosphor-dbus-interfaces repository at:

    https://github.com/openbmc/phosphor-dbus-interfaces

See: http://dbus.freedesktop.org/doc/dbus-api-design.html

Best practices for C

There are numerous resources available elsewhere, but a few items that are relevant to OpenBMC work:

  • You almost never need to use system(<some shell pipeline>). Reading and writing from files should be done with the appropriate system calls.

    Generally, it's much better to use fork(); execve() if you do need to spawn a process, especially if you need to provide variable arguments.

  • Use the stdint types (eg, uint32_t, int8_t) for data that needs to be a certain size. Use the PRIxx macros for printf, if necessary.

  • Don't assume that char is signed or unsigned.

  • Beware of endian considerations when reading to & writing from C types

  • Declare internal-only functions as static, declare read-only data as const where possible.

  • Ensure that your code compiles without warnings, especially for changes to the kernel.

Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1

By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:

(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
    have the right to submit it under the open source license
    indicated in the file; or

(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
    of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
    license and I have the right under that license to submit that
    work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
    by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
    permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
    in the file; or

(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
    person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
    it.

(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
    are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
    personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
    maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
    this project or the open source license(s) involved.