poky: subtree update:0ac99625bf..796be0593a
Alexander Kanavin (31):
netbase: upgrade 6.1 -> 6.2
meson: upgrade 0.55.1 -> 0.56.0
vulkan-samples: update to latest revision
libcap: update 2.44 -> 2.45
bind: upgrade 9.16.7 -> 9.16.9
quota: upgrade 4.05 -> 4.06
pango: upgrade 1.46.2 -> 1.48.0
elfutils: upgrade 0.181 -> 0.182
ifupdown: upgrade 0.8.35 -> 0.8.36
createrepo-c: upgrade 0.16.1 -> 0.16.2
acpica: upgrade 20200925 -> 20201113
grep: upgrade 3.5 -> 3.6
man-pages: upgrade 5.08 -> 5.09
stress-ng: upgrade 0.11.23 -> 0.11.24
libhandy: upgrade 1.0.1 -> 1.0.2
piglit: upgrade to latest revision
xkbcomp: upgrade 1.4.3 -> 1.4.4
lz4: upgrade 1.9.2 -> 1.9.3
bison: upgrade 3.7.3 -> 3.7.4
python3-setuptools-scm: fix upstream version check
cantarell-fonts: update 0.0.25 -> 0.201
meta/lib/oe/reproducible.py: gitsm:// works just as fine as git:// for timestamps
llvm: fix reproducibility
ruby: fix reproducibility
webkitgtk: fix reproducibility
ffmpeg: fix reproducibility
piglit: fix reproducibility
serf: do not install the static library
llvm: sort the lists in generated source reproducibibly
kea: fix reproducibility
poky.conf: do not write current date into distro version, use git hash instead
Andrej Valek (1):
kernel-dummy: fix executing unexpected tasks
Anuj Mittal (1):
releases.rst: add gatesgarth to current releases
Brett Warren (1):
libffi: add patch to revert clang VFP workaround
Chandana kalluri (1):
populate_sdk_ext: use SDK_CUSTOM_TEPLATECONF variable to enable custom templateconf.cfg
Changqing Li (1):
buildtools-tarball: add wic dependency into extended buildtools
Diego Sueiro (2):
modutils-initscripts: Fix modules.dep creation when USE_DEPMOD="0"
initscripts: Change execution order between checkroot and modutils
Dmitry Baryshkov (2):
linux-firmware: upgrade 20201022 -> 20201118
linux-firmware: package ath11k firmware
Fabio Berton (1):
mesa: Update 20.2.1 -> 20.2.4
Gratian Crisan (1):
kernel-module-split.bbclass: fix kernel modules getting marked as CONFFILES
Jack Mitchell (3):
Revert "connman: set service to conflict with systemd-networkd"
systemd-conf: add PACKAGECONFIG to enable/disable auto ethernet DHCP
systemd-conf: match ethernet interfaces by type rather than globbing
Joshua Watt (2):
bitbake: hashserv: client: Fix AF_UNIX path length limits
bitbake: hashserv: Fix broken AF_UNIX path length limit
Kai Kang (2):
systemd-systemctl-native: capable to call without argument
systemd.bbclass: update command to check systemctl available
Kevin Hao (1):
tune-octeontx2.inc: Add tune for Marvell OCTEON TX2 core
Li Wang (2):
qemu: CVE-2020-29129 CVE-2020-29130
qemu: CVE-2020-25624
Luca Boccassi (1):
dbus: move messagebus user to dbus-common package
Michael Halstead (1):
releases: conf: add link to 3.1.4, update to include 3.1.4
Nicolas Dechesne (19):
sphinx: add .vscode in .gitignore
{dev,kernel,sdk}-manual: replace hardcoded release version with &DISTRO;
sphinx: replace bitbake labels with references to corresponding title
brief-yoctoprojectqs: replace labels with references to section title
dev-manual: replace labels with references to section title
ref-manual: replace labels with references to section title
sdk-manual: replace labels with references to section title
overview-manual: remove unused labels
dev-manual: remove unused labels
sphinx: rename top level document in each manual
sphinx: use absolute paths for :doc: references
test-manual: remove 'test-manual' from filenames
toaster-manual: remove 'toaster-manual' from filenames
dev-manual: remove 'dev-manual' from filenames
kernel-dev: remove 'kernel-dev' from filenames
profile-manual: remove 'profile-manual' from filenames
overview-manual: remove 'overview-manual' from filenames
sdk-manual: remove 'sdk' from filenames
ref-manual: remove 'ref' from filenames
Paul Barker (5):
documentation: Simplify yocto_wiki links
documentation: Simplify yocto_git links
ref-manual: Simplify oe_git links
poky.conf: Add opensuseleap-15.2 and fedora-33 to tested distros
poky.conf: Drop fedora-30 from tested distros
Peter Kjellerstedt (2):
pseudo: Simplify pseudo_client_ignore_path_chroot()
bitbake.conf: Add all layers (from BBLAYERS) to PSEUDO_IGNORE_PATHS
Richard Purdie (8):
lz4: Use the new branch naming from upstream
Revert "bitbake.conf: Add all layers (from BBLAYERS) to PSEUDO_IGNORE_PATHS"
build-appliance-image: Update to master head revision
bitbake: Revert "fetch2: use relative symlinks for anything pulled from PREMIRRORS"
build-appliance-image: Update to master head revision
metadata_scm: Fix signature handling of METADATA_REVISION and METADATA_BRANCH
poky: Set SDK_VERSION explicitly
build-appliance-image: Update to master head revision
Ross Burton (9):
oeqa/devtool: use Yocto mirror for pv-1.5.3 tarball
image_types: remove obsolete tar comment
image_types: sort tarball file listings
package_manager/ipk: neaten OPKGLIBDIR logic
ldconfig-native: don't write auxiliary cache
package_manager/ipk: improve remove_packaging_data
oeqa/selftest/containerimage: update for improved cleanup
coreutils: add SUSE-specific issues to CVE whitelist
bitbake: msg: use safe YAML loader
Sinan Kaya (1):
poky-tiny: enable section removal
Tomasz Dziendzielski (1):
pseudo: Update to print PSEUDO_LOGFILE in abort message on path mismatches
sangeeta jain (1):
meta/lib/oeqa/manual/oe-core.json: Update test_bitbake_devshell
zangrc (3):
libinput: upgrade 1.16.3 -> 1.16.4
lighttpd: upgrade 1.4.55 -> 1.4.56
sysstat: upgrade 12.4.0 -> 12.4.1
Signed-off-by: Andrew Geissler <geissonator@yahoo.com>
Change-Id: I65f2f1c9d44433f3e62609240012c42256679b51
diff --git a/poky/documentation/kernel-dev/concepts-appx.rst b/poky/documentation/kernel-dev/concepts-appx.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4b6dbe5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/poky/documentation/kernel-dev/concepts-appx.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,423 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-2.0-UK
+
+************************
+Advanced Kernel Concepts
+************************
+
+Yocto Project Kernel Development and Maintenance
+================================================
+
+Kernels available through the Yocto Project (Yocto Linux kernels), like
+other kernels, are based off the Linux kernel releases from
+https://www.kernel.org. At the beginning of a major Linux kernel
+development cycle, the Yocto Project team chooses a Linux kernel based
+on factors such as release timing, the anticipated release timing of
+final upstream ``kernel.org`` versions, and Yocto Project feature
+requirements. Typically, the Linux kernel chosen is in the final stages
+of development by the Linux community. In other words, the Linux kernel
+is in the release candidate or "rc" phase and has yet to reach final
+release. But, by being in the final stages of external development, the
+team knows that the ``kernel.org`` final release will clearly be within
+the early stages of the Yocto Project development window.
+
+This balance allows the Yocto Project team to deliver the most
+up-to-date Yocto Linux kernel possible, while still ensuring that the
+team has a stable official release for the baseline Linux kernel
+version.
+
+As implied earlier, the ultimate source for Yocto Linux kernels are
+released kernels from ``kernel.org``. In addition to a foundational
+kernel from ``kernel.org``, the available Yocto Linux kernels contain a
+mix of important new mainline developments, non-mainline developments
+(when no alternative exists), Board Support Package (BSP) developments,
+and custom features. These additions result in a commercially released
+Yocto Project Linux kernel that caters to specific embedded designer
+needs for targeted hardware.
+
+You can find a web interface to the Yocto Linux kernels in the
+:ref:`overview-manual/development-environment:yocto project source repositories`
+at :yocto_git:`/`. If you look at the interface, you will see to
+the left a grouping of Git repositories titled "Yocto Linux Kernel".
+Within this group, you will find several Linux Yocto kernels developed
+and included with Yocto Project releases:
+
+- *linux-yocto-4.1:* The stable Yocto Project kernel to use with
+ the Yocto Project Release 2.0. This kernel is based on the Linux 4.1
+ released kernel.
+
+- *linux-yocto-4.4:* The stable Yocto Project kernel to use with
+ the Yocto Project Release 2.1. This kernel is based on the Linux 4.4
+ released kernel.
+
+- *linux-yocto-4.6:* A temporary kernel that is not tied to any
+ Yocto Project release.
+
+- *linux-yocto-4.8:* The stable yocto Project kernel to use with
+ the Yocto Project Release 2.2.
+
+- *linux-yocto-4.9:* The stable Yocto Project kernel to use with
+ the Yocto Project Release 2.3. This kernel is based on the Linux 4.9
+ released kernel.
+
+- *linux-yocto-4.10:* The default stable Yocto Project kernel to
+ use with the Yocto Project Release 2.3. This kernel is based on the
+ Linux 4.10 released kernel.
+
+- *linux-yocto-4.12:* The default stable Yocto Project kernel to
+ use with the Yocto Project Release 2.4. This kernel is based on the
+ Linux 4.12 released kernel.
+
+- *yocto-kernel-cache:* The ``linux-yocto-cache`` contains patches
+ and configurations for the linux-yocto kernel tree. This repository
+ is useful when working on the linux-yocto kernel. For more
+ information on this "Advanced Kernel Metadata", see the
+ ":doc:`/kernel-dev/advanced`" Chapter.
+
+- *linux-yocto-dev:* A development kernel based on the latest
+ upstream release candidate available.
+
+.. note::
+
+ Long Term Support Initiative (LTSI) for Yocto Linux kernels is as
+ follows:
+
+ - For Yocto Project releases 1.7, 1.8, and 2.0, the LTSI kernel is
+ ``linux-yocto-3.14``.
+
+ - For Yocto Project releases 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3, the LTSI kernel is
+ ``linux-yocto-4.1``.
+
+ - For Yocto Project release 2.4, the LTSI kernel is
+ ``linux-yocto-4.9``
+
+ - ``linux-yocto-4.4`` is an LTS kernel.
+
+Once a Yocto Linux kernel is officially released, the Yocto Project team
+goes into their next development cycle, or upward revision (uprev)
+cycle, while still continuing maintenance on the released kernel. It is
+important to note that the most sustainable and stable way to include
+feature development upstream is through a kernel uprev process.
+Back-porting hundreds of individual fixes and minor features from
+various kernel versions is not sustainable and can easily compromise
+quality.
+
+During the uprev cycle, the Yocto Project team uses an ongoing analysis
+of Linux kernel development, BSP support, and release timing to select
+the best possible ``kernel.org`` Linux kernel version on which to base
+subsequent Yocto Linux kernel development. The team continually monitors
+Linux community kernel development to look for significant features of
+interest. The team does consider back-porting large features if they
+have a significant advantage. User or community demand can also trigger
+a back-port or creation of new functionality in the Yocto Project
+baseline kernel during the uprev cycle.
+
+Generally speaking, every new Linux kernel both adds features and
+introduces new bugs. These consequences are the basic properties of
+upstream Linux kernel development and are managed by the Yocto Project
+team's Yocto Linux kernel development strategy. It is the Yocto Project
+team's policy to not back-port minor features to the released Yocto
+Linux kernel. They only consider back-porting significant technological
+jumps - and, that is done after a complete gap analysis. The reason
+for this policy is that back-porting any small to medium sized change
+from an evolving Linux kernel can easily create mismatches,
+incompatibilities and very subtle errors.
+
+The policies described in this section result in both a stable and a
+cutting edge Yocto Linux kernel that mixes forward ports of existing
+Linux kernel features and significant and critical new functionality.
+Forward porting Linux kernel functionality into the Yocto Linux kernels
+available through the Yocto Project can be thought of as a "micro
+uprev". The many "micro uprevs" produce a Yocto Linux kernel version
+with a mix of important new mainline, non-mainline, BSP developments and
+feature integrations. This Yocto Linux kernel gives insight into new
+features and allows focused amounts of testing to be done on the kernel,
+which prevents surprises when selecting the next major uprev. The
+quality of these cutting edge Yocto Linux kernels is evolving and the
+kernels are used in leading edge feature and BSP development.
+
+Yocto Linux Kernel Architecture and Branching Strategies
+========================================================
+
+As mentioned earlier, a key goal of the Yocto Project is to present the
+developer with a kernel that has a clear and continuous history that is
+visible to the user. The architecture and mechanisms, in particular the
+branching strategies, used achieve that goal in a manner similar to
+upstream Linux kernel development in ``kernel.org``.
+
+You can think of a Yocto Linux kernel as consisting of a baseline Linux
+kernel with added features logically structured on top of the baseline.
+The features are tagged and organized by way of a branching strategy
+implemented by the Yocto Project team using the Source Code Manager
+(SCM) Git.
+
+.. note::
+
+ - Git is the obvious SCM for meeting the Yocto Linux kernel
+ organizational and structural goals described in this section. Not
+ only is Git the SCM for Linux kernel development in ``kernel.org``
+ but, Git continues to grow in popularity and supports many
+ different work flows, front-ends and management techniques.
+
+ - You can find documentation on Git at https://git-scm.com/doc. You can
+ also get an introduction to Git as it applies to the Yocto Project in the
+ ":ref:`overview-manual/development-environment:git`" section in the Yocto Project
+ Overview and Concepts Manual. The latter reference provides an
+ overview of Git and presents a minimal set of Git commands that
+ allows you to be functional using Git. You can use as much, or as
+ little, of what Git has to offer to accomplish what you need for
+ your project. You do not have to be a "Git Expert" in order to use
+ it with the Yocto Project.
+
+Using Git's tagging and branching features, the Yocto Project team
+creates kernel branches at points where functionality is no longer
+shared and thus, needs to be isolated. For example, board-specific
+incompatibilities would require different functionality and would
+require a branch to separate the features. Likewise, for specific kernel
+features, the same branching strategy is used.
+
+This "tree-like" architecture results in a structure that has features
+organized to be specific for particular functionality, single kernel
+types, or a subset of kernel types. Thus, the user has the ability to
+see the added features and the commits that make up those features. In
+addition to being able to see added features, the user can also view the
+history of what made up the baseline Linux kernel.
+
+Another consequence of this strategy results in not having to store the
+same feature twice internally in the tree. Rather, the kernel team
+stores the unique differences required to apply the feature onto the
+kernel type in question.
+
+.. note::
+
+ The Yocto Project team strives to place features in the tree such
+ that features can be shared by all boards and kernel types where
+ possible. However, during development cycles or when large features
+ are merged, the team cannot always follow this practice. In those
+ cases, the team uses isolated branches to merge features.
+
+BSP-specific code additions are handled in a similar manner to
+kernel-specific additions. Some BSPs only make sense given certain
+kernel types. So, for these types, the team creates branches off the end
+of that kernel type for all of the BSPs that are supported on that
+kernel type. From the perspective of the tools that create the BSP
+branch, the BSP is really no different than a feature. Consequently, the
+same branching strategy applies to BSPs as it does to kernel features.
+So again, rather than store the BSP twice, the team only stores the
+unique differences for the BSP across the supported multiple kernels.
+
+While this strategy can result in a tree with a significant number of
+branches, it is important to realize that from the developer's point of
+view, there is a linear path that travels from the baseline
+``kernel.org``, through a select group of features and ends with their
+BSP-specific commits. In other words, the divisions of the kernel are
+transparent and are not relevant to the developer on a day-to-day basis.
+From the developer's perspective, this path is the "master" branch in
+Git terms. The developer does not need to be aware of the existence of
+any other branches at all. Of course, value exists in the having these
+branches in the tree, should a person decide to explore them. For
+example, a comparison between two BSPs at either the commit level or at
+the line-by-line code ``diff`` level is now a trivial operation.
+
+The following illustration shows the conceptual Yocto Linux kernel.
+
+.. image:: figures/kernel-architecture-overview.png
+ :align: center
+
+In the illustration, the "Kernel.org Branch Point" marks the specific
+spot (or Linux kernel release) from which the Yocto Linux kernel is
+created. From this point forward in the tree, features and differences
+are organized and tagged.
+
+The "Yocto Project Baseline Kernel" contains functionality that is
+common to every kernel type and BSP that is organized further along in
+the tree. Placing these common features in the tree this way means
+features do not have to be duplicated along individual branches of the
+tree structure.
+
+From the "Yocto Project Baseline Kernel", branch points represent
+specific functionality for individual Board Support Packages (BSPs) as
+well as real-time kernels. The illustration represents this through
+three BSP-specific branches and a real-time kernel branch. Each branch
+represents some unique functionality for the BSP or for a real-time
+Yocto Linux kernel.
+
+In this example structure, the "Real-time (rt) Kernel" branch has common
+features for all real-time Yocto Linux kernels and contains more
+branches for individual BSP-specific real-time kernels. The illustration
+shows three branches as an example. Each branch points the way to
+specific, unique features for a respective real-time kernel as they
+apply to a given BSP.
+
+The resulting tree structure presents a clear path of markers (or
+branches) to the developer that, for all practical purposes, is the
+Yocto Linux kernel needed for any given set of requirements.
+
+.. note::
+
+ Keep in mind the figure does not take into account all the supported
+ Yocto Linux kernels, but rather shows a single generic kernel just
+ for conceptual purposes. Also keep in mind that this structure
+ represents the
+ :ref:`overview-manual/development-environment:yocto project source repositories`
+ that are either pulled from during the build or established on the
+ host development system prior to the build by either cloning a
+ particular kernel's Git repository or by downloading and unpacking a
+ tarball.
+
+Working with the kernel as a structured tree follows recognized
+community best practices. In particular, the kernel as shipped with the
+product, should be considered an "upstream source" and viewed as a
+series of historical and documented modifications (commits). These
+modifications represent the development and stabilization done by the
+Yocto Project kernel development team.
+
+Because commits only change at significant release points in the product
+life cycle, developers can work on a branch created from the last
+relevant commit in the shipped Yocto Project Linux kernel. As mentioned
+previously, the structure is transparent to the developer because the
+kernel tree is left in this state after cloning and building the kernel.
+
+Kernel Build File Hierarchy
+===========================
+
+Upstream storage of all the available kernel source code is one thing,
+while representing and using the code on your host development system is
+another. Conceptually, you can think of the kernel source repositories
+as all the source files necessary for all the supported Yocto Linux
+kernels. As a developer, you are just interested in the source files for
+the kernel on which you are working. And, furthermore, you need them
+available on your host system.
+
+Kernel source code is available on your host system several different
+ways:
+
+- *Files Accessed While using devtool:* ``devtool``, which is
+ available with the Yocto Project, is the preferred method by which to
+ modify the kernel. See the ":ref:`kernel-dev/intro:kernel modification workflow`" section.
+
+- *Cloned Repository:* If you are working in the kernel all the time,
+ you probably would want to set up your own local Git repository of
+ the Yocto Linux kernel tree. For information on how to clone a Yocto
+ Linux kernel Git repository, see the
+ ":ref:`kernel-dev/common:preparing the build host to work on the kernel`"
+ section.
+
+- *Temporary Source Files from a Build:* If you just need to make some
+ patches to the kernel using a traditional BitBake workflow (i.e. not
+ using the ``devtool``), you can access temporary kernel source files
+ that were extracted and used during a kernel build.
+
+The temporary kernel source files resulting from a build using BitBake
+have a particular hierarchy. When you build the kernel on your
+development system, all files needed for the build are taken from the
+source repositories pointed to by the
+:term:`SRC_URI` variable and gathered
+in a temporary work area where they are subsequently used to create the
+unique kernel. Thus, in a sense, the process constructs a local source
+tree specific to your kernel from which to generate the new kernel
+image.
+
+The following figure shows the temporary file structure created on your
+host system when you build the kernel using Bitbake. This
+:term:`Build Directory` contains all the
+source files used during the build.
+
+.. image:: figures/kernel-overview-2-generic.png
+ :align: center
+
+Again, for additional information on the Yocto Project kernel's
+architecture and its branching strategy, see the
+":ref:`kernel-dev/concepts-appx:yocto linux kernel architecture and branching strategies`"
+section. You can also reference the
+":ref:`kernel-dev/common:using \`\`devtool\`\` to patch the kernel`"
+and
+":ref:`kernel-dev/common:using traditional kernel development to patch the kernel`"
+sections for detailed example that modifies the kernel.
+
+Determining Hardware and Non-Hardware Features for the Kernel Configuration Audit Phase
+=======================================================================================
+
+This section describes part of the kernel configuration audit phase that
+most developers can ignore. For general information on kernel
+configuration including ``menuconfig``, ``defconfig`` files, and
+configuration fragments, see the
+":ref:`kernel-dev/common:configuring the kernel`" section.
+
+During this part of the audit phase, the contents of the final
+``.config`` file are compared against the fragments specified by the
+system. These fragments can be system fragments, distro fragments, or
+user-specified configuration elements. Regardless of their origin, the
+OpenEmbedded build system warns the user if a specific option is not
+included in the final kernel configuration.
+
+By default, in order to not overwhelm the user with configuration
+warnings, the system only reports missing "hardware" options as they
+could result in a boot failure or indicate that important hardware is
+not available.
+
+To determine whether or not a given option is "hardware" or
+"non-hardware", the kernel Metadata in ``yocto-kernel-cache`` contains
+files that classify individual or groups of options as either hardware
+or non-hardware. To better show this, consider a situation where the
+``yocto-kernel-cache`` contains the following files:
+::
+
+ yocto-kernel-cache/features/drm-psb/hardware.cfg
+ yocto-kernel-cache/features/kgdb/hardware.cfg
+ yocto-kernel-cache/ktypes/base/hardware.cfg
+ yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/mti-malta32/hardware.cfg
+ yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/qemu-ppc32/hardware.cfg
+ yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/qemuarma9/hardware.cfg
+ yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/mti-malta64/hardware.cfg
+ yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/arm-versatile-926ejs/hardware.cfg
+ yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/common-pc/hardware.cfg
+ yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/common-pc-64/hardware.cfg
+ yocto-kernel-cache/features/rfkill/non-hardware.cfg
+ yocto-kernel-cache/ktypes/base/non-hardware.cfg
+ yocto-kernel-cache/features/aufs/non-hardware.kcf
+ yocto-kernel-cache/features/ocf/non-hardware.kcf
+ yocto-kernel-cache/ktypes/base/non-hardware.kcf
+ yocto-kernel-cache/ktypes/base/hardware.kcf
+ yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/qemu-ppc32/hardware.kcf
+
+The following list
+provides explanations for the various files:
+
+- ``hardware.kcf``: Specifies a list of kernel Kconfig files that
+ contain hardware options only.
+
+- ``non-hardware.kcf``: Specifies a list of kernel Kconfig files that
+ contain non-hardware options only.
+
+- ``hardware.cfg``: Specifies a list of kernel ``CONFIG_`` options that
+ are hardware, regardless of whether or not they are within a Kconfig
+ file specified by a hardware or non-hardware Kconfig file (i.e.
+ ``hardware.kcf`` or ``non-hardware.kcf``).
+
+- ``non-hardware.cfg``: Specifies a list of kernel ``CONFIG_`` options
+ that are not hardware, regardless of whether or not they are within a
+ Kconfig file specified by a hardware or non-hardware Kconfig file
+ (i.e. ``hardware.kcf`` or ``non-hardware.kcf``).
+
+Here is a specific example using the
+``kernel-cache/bsp/mti-malta32/hardware.cfg``:
+::
+
+ CONFIG_SERIAL_8250
+ CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE
+ CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_NR_UARTS
+ CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_PCI
+ CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE
+ CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE_CONSOLE
+ CONFIG_VGA_ARB
+
+The kernel configuration audit automatically detects
+these files (hence the names must be exactly the ones discussed here),
+and uses them as inputs when generating warnings about the final
+``.config`` file.
+
+A user-specified kernel Metadata repository, or recipe space feature,
+can use these same files to classify options that are found within its
+``.cfg`` files as hardware or non-hardware, to prevent the OpenEmbedded
+build system from producing an error or warning when an option is not in
+the final ``.config`` file.