From 56893a61aa4f0270fa8d1197b9848247f90fce0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yousong Zhou <yszhou4tech@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:36:03 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Fix invalid sigprocmask call

The POSIX document says

    The pthread_sigmask() and sigprocmask() functions shall fail if:

    [EINVAL]
    The value of the how argument is not equal to one of the defined values.

and this is how musl-libc is currently doing.  Fix the call to be safe
and correct

 [1] http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/pthread_sigmask.html

gdb/ChangeLog:
2017-03-24  Yousong Zhou  <yszhou4tech@gmail.com>

    * common/signals-state-save-restore.c (save_original_signals_state):
    Fix invalid sigprocmask call.
---
Upstream-Status: Pending [not author, cherry-picked from LEDE https://bugs.lede-project.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=637&openedfrom=-1%2Bweek]
Signed-off-by: André Draszik <adraszik@tycoint.com>
 gdb/ChangeLog                           | 5 +++++
 gdb/common/signals-state-save-restore.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gdb/common/signals-state-save-restore.c b/gdb/common/signals-state-save-restore.c
index d11a9ae..734335c 100644
--- a/gdb/common/signals-state-save-restore.c
+++ b/gdb/common/signals-state-save-restore.c
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ save_original_signals_state (void)
   int i;
   int res;
 
-  res = sigprocmask (0,  NULL, &original_signal_mask);
+  res = sigprocmask (SIG_BLOCK,  NULL, &original_signal_mask);
   if (res == -1)
     perror_with_name (("sigprocmask"));
 
-- 
2.6.4