From d4f73b037d11d20f080e74c05df28853fb833075 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 22:59:47 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Do not set Wno-unused-but-set-variable

This is gcc specific warning, not implemented by  pretending to be  gcc
like compilers e.g. clang.

We will pass this option from recipe

Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [OE-Specific]

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
---
 m4/compiler_warnings.m4 | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/m4/compiler_warnings.m4 b/m4/compiler_warnings.m4
index f498a28..e65e97f 100644
--- a/m4/compiler_warnings.m4
+++ b/m4/compiler_warnings.m4
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ if test "$GCC" = "yes" -a "$set_more_warnings" != "no"; then
 		      -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wstrict-prototypes \
 		      -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-sign-compare \
 		      -Wno-deprecated-declarations \
-		      -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -Wformat-security; do
+		      -Wno-unused -Wformat-security; do
 		SAVE_CFLAGS="$CFLAGS"
 		CFLAGS="$CFLAGS $option"
 		AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether gcc understands $option])