From 311cf9abc213fcd76795cc3a25814a15fb552065 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 13:22:14 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] setup.py: do not report missing dependencies for disabled
 modules

Reporting those missing dependencies is misleading as the modules would not
have been built anyway. This particularly matters in oe-core's automated
build completeness checker which relies on the report.

Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [oe-core specific]
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Hernandez Samaniego <alejandro@enedino.org>

---
 setup.py | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/setup.py b/setup.py
index 934cf2e..ccf83b4 100644
--- a/setup.py
+++ b/setup.py
@@ -517,6 +517,14 @@ class PyBuildExt(build_ext):
                 print("%-*s   %-*s   %-*s" % (longest, e, longest, f,
                                               longest, g))
 
+        # There is no need to report missing module dependencies,
+        # if the modules have been disabled in the first place.
+        # cannot use mods_disabled here, because remove_configured_extensions adds
+        # only disabled extensions into it (doesn't cover _dbm, _gdbm, readline
+        # we support disabling through PACKAGECONFIG)
+        sysconf_dis = sysconfig.get_config_var('MODDISABLED_NAMES').split()
+        self.missing = list(set(self.missing) - set(sysconf_dis))
+
         if self.missing:
             print()
             print("The necessary bits to build these optional modules were not "