diff --git a/poky/meta/recipes-extended/ltp/ltp/0010-shmctl01-don-t-use-hardcoded-index-0-for-SHM_STAT-te.patch b/poky/meta/recipes-extended/ltp/ltp/0010-shmctl01-don-t-use-hardcoded-index-0-for-SHM_STAT-te.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8704e5f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/poky/meta/recipes-extended/ltp/ltp/0010-shmctl01-don-t-use-hardcoded-index-0-for-SHM_STAT-te.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+From 794933b38354a2612cf2c471f11798b306f35315 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
+Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 20:47:20 +0200
+Subject: [PATCH] shmctl01: don't use hardcoded index == 0 for SHM_STAT test
+
+Test fails on SHM_STAT testcase:
+   shmctl01    5  TFAIL  :  shmctl01.c:173: shmctl01 call failed
+                            errno = 22 : Invalid argument
+   shmctl(0, SHM_STAT, 0x601060)           = -EINVAL
+
+since following commit:
+   commit 99db46ea292780cd978d56932d9445b1e8bdafe8
+   Author: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
+   Date:   Tue May 14 15:46:36 2019 -0700
+     ipc: do cyclic id allocation for the ipc object.
+
+Don't rely on index 0 being always available, but instead
+use (maximum) index returned by SHM_INFO.
+
+Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
+Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
+Acked-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
+
+Upstream-Status: Backport
+[https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/commit/db0a43d9388be2c347a8306751bbe6bec086d062]
+
+Signed-off-by: Hongzhi Song <hongzhi.song@windriver.com>
+Signed-off-by: Yi Zhao <yi.zhao@windriver.com>
+---
+ testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmctl/shmctl01.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
+ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmctl/shmctl01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmctl/shmctl01.c
+index 1b46977..52bf23a 100644
+--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmctl/shmctl01.c
++++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmctl/shmctl01.c
+@@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ static void func_info(int ret);
+ 
+ /* Check routine for SHM_STAT */
+ static void func_sstat(int ret);
++static void func_sstat_setup(void);
+ 
+ /* Check routine for SHM_LOCK */
+ static void func_lock(int ret);
+@@ -110,7 +111,7 @@ static struct test_case_t {
+ #endif
+ 	{&shm_id_1, IPC_SET, &buf, func_set, set_setup},
+ 	{&shm_id_1, IPC_INFO, (struct shmid_ds *) &info, func_info, NULL},
+-	{&shm_index, SHM_STAT, &buf, func_sstat, NULL},
++	{&shm_index, SHM_STAT, &buf, func_sstat, func_sstat_setup},
+ 	{&shm_id_1, SHM_LOCK, NULL, func_lock, NULL},
+ 	{&shm_id_1, SHM_UNLOCK, NULL, func_unlock, NULL},
+ 	{&shm_id_1, IPC_RMID, NULL, func_rmid, NULL},
+@@ -407,9 +408,23 @@ static void func_info(int ret)
+ static void func_sstat(int ret)
+ {
+ 	if (ret >= 0)
+-		tst_resm(TPASS, "get correct shared memory id");
++		tst_resm(TPASS, "get correct shared memory id for index: %d",
++			shm_index);
+ 	else
+-		tst_resm(TFAIL, "shared memory id is incorrect");
++		tst_resm(TFAIL, "shared memory id is incorrect, index: %d",
++			shm_index);
++}
++
++static void func_sstat_setup(void)
++{
++	struct shm_info tmp;
++	int ret;
++
++	ret = shmctl(shm_id_1, SHM_INFO, (void *)&tmp);
++	if (ret < 0)
++		tst_resm(TFAIL|TERRNO, "shmctl(SHM_INFO)");
++	else
++		shm_index = ret;
+ }
+ 
+ static void func_lock(int ret)
+-- 
+2.7.4
+