Squashed 'yocto-poky/' content from commit ea562de

git-subtree-dir: yocto-poky
git-subtree-split: ea562de57590c966cd5a75fda8defecd397e6436
diff --git a/documentation/kernel-dev/kernel-dev-concepts-appx.xml b/documentation/kernel-dev/kernel-dev-concepts-appx.xml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ac91749
--- /dev/null
+++ b/documentation/kernel-dev/kernel-dev-concepts-appx.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
+<!DOCTYPE chapter PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.2//EN"
+"http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.2/docbookx.dtd"
+[<!ENTITY % poky SYSTEM "../poky.ent"> %poky; ] >
+
+<appendix id='kernel-dev-concepts-appx'>
+<title>Advanced Kernel Concepts</title>
+
+    <section id='kernel-big-picture'>
+        <title>Yocto Project Kernel Development and Maintenance</title>
+        <para>
+            Kernels available through the Yocto Project, like other kernels, are based off the Linux
+            kernel releases from <ulink url='http://www.kernel.org'></ulink>.
+            At the beginning of a major development cycle, the Yocto Project team
+            chooses its kernel based on factors such as release timing, the anticipated release
+            timing of final upstream <filename>kernel.org</filename> versions, and Yocto Project
+            feature requirements.
+            Typically, the kernel chosen is in the
+            final stages of development by the community.
+            In other words, the kernel is in the release
+            candidate or "rc" phase and not yet a final release.
+            But, by being in the final stages of external development, the team knows that the
+            <filename>kernel.org</filename> final release will clearly be within the early stages of
+            the Yocto Project development window.
+        </para>
+        <para>
+            This balance allows the team to deliver the most up-to-date kernel
+            possible, while still ensuring that the team has a stable official release for
+            the baseline Linux kernel version.
+        </para>
+        <para>
+            The ultimate source for kernels available through the Yocto Project are released kernels
+            from <filename>kernel.org</filename>.
+            In addition to a foundational kernel from <filename>kernel.org</filename>, the
+            kernels available contain a mix of important new mainline
+            developments, non-mainline developments (when there is no alternative),
+            Board Support Package (BSP) developments,
+            and custom features.
+            These additions result in a commercially released Yocto Project Linux kernel that caters
+            to specific embedded designer needs for targeted hardware.
+        </para>
+        <para>
+            Once a kernel is officially released, the Yocto Project team goes into
+            their next development cycle, or upward revision (uprev) cycle, while still
+            continuing maintenance on the released kernel.
+            It is important to note that the most sustainable and stable way
+            to include feature development upstream is through a kernel uprev process.
+            Back-porting hundreds of individual fixes and minor features from various
+            kernel versions is not sustainable and can easily compromise quality.
+        </para>
+        <para>
+            During the uprev cycle, the Yocto Project team uses an ongoing analysis of
+            kernel development, BSP support, and release timing to select the best
+            possible <filename>kernel.org</filename> version.
+            The team continually monitors community kernel
+            development to look for significant features of interest.
+            The team does consider back-porting large features if they have a significant advantage.
+            User or community demand can also trigger a back-port or creation of new
+            functionality in the Yocto Project baseline kernel during the uprev cycle.
+        </para>
+        <para>
+            Generally speaking, every new kernel both adds features and introduces new bugs.
+            These consequences are the basic properties of upstream kernel development and are
+            managed by the Yocto Project team's kernel strategy.
+            It is the Yocto Project team's policy to not back-port minor features to the released kernel.
+            They only consider back-porting significant technological jumps - and, that is done
+            after a complete gap analysis.
+            The reason for this policy is that back-porting any small to medium sized change
+            from an evolving kernel can easily create mismatches, incompatibilities and very
+            subtle errors.
+        </para>
+        <para>
+            These policies result in both a stable and a cutting
+            edge kernel that mixes forward ports of existing features and significant and critical
+            new functionality.
+            Forward porting functionality in the kernels available through the Yocto Project kernel
+            can be thought of as a "micro uprev."
+            The many “micro uprevs” produce a kernel version with a mix of
+            important new mainline, non-mainline, BSP developments and feature integrations.
+            This kernel gives insight into new features and allows focused
+            amounts of testing to be done on the kernel, which prevents
+            surprises when selecting the next major uprev.
+            The quality of these cutting edge kernels is evolving and the kernels are used in leading edge
+            feature and BSP development.
+        </para>
+    </section>
+
+    <section id='kernel-architecture'>
+        <title>Kernel Architecture</title>
+        <para>
+            This section describes the architecture of the kernels available through the
+            Yocto Project and provides information
+            on the mechanisms used to achieve that architecture.
+        </para>
+
+        <section id='architecture-overview'>
+            <title>Overview</title>
+            <para>
+                As mentioned earlier, a key goal of the Yocto Project is to present the
+                developer with
+                a kernel that has a clear and continuous history that is visible to the user.
+                The architecture and mechanisms used achieve that goal in a manner similar to the
+                upstream <filename>kernel.org</filename>.
+            </para>
+            <para>
+                You can think of a Yocto Project kernel as consisting of a baseline Linux kernel with
+                added features logically structured on top of the baseline.
+                The features are tagged and organized by way of a branching strategy implemented by the
+                source code manager (SCM) Git.
+                For information on Git as applied to the Yocto Project, see the
+                "<ulink url='&YOCTO_DOCS_DEV_URL;#git'>Git</ulink>" section in the
+                Yocto Project Development Manual.
+            </para>
+            <para>
+                The result is that the user has the ability to see the added features and
+                the commits that make up those features.
+                In addition to being able to see added features, the user can also view the history of what
+                made up the baseline kernel.
+            </para>
+            <para>
+                The following illustration shows the conceptual Yocto Project kernel.
+            </para>
+            <para>
+                <imagedata fileref="figures/kernel-architecture-overview.png" width="6in" depth="7in" align="center" scale="100" />
+            </para>
+            <para>
+                In the illustration, the "Kernel.org Branch Point"
+                marks the specific spot (or release) from
+                which the Yocto Project kernel is created.
+                From this point "up" in the tree, features and differences are organized and tagged.
+            </para>
+            <para>
+                The "Yocto Project Baseline Kernel" contains functionality that is common to every kernel
+                type and BSP that is organized further up the tree.
+                Placing these common features in the
+                tree this way means features do not have to be duplicated along individual branches of the
+                structure.
+            </para>
+            <para>
+                From the Yocto Project Baseline Kernel, branch points represent specific functionality
+                for individual BSPs as well as real-time kernels.
+                The illustration represents this through three BSP-specific branches and a real-time
+                kernel branch.
+                Each branch represents some unique functionality for the BSP or a real-time kernel.
+            </para>
+            <para>
+                In this example structure, the real-time kernel branch has common features for all
+                real-time kernels and contains
+                more branches for individual BSP-specific real-time kernels.
+                The illustration shows three branches as an example.
+                Each branch points the way to specific, unique features for a respective real-time
+                kernel as they apply to a given BSP.
+            </para>
+            <para>
+                The resulting tree structure presents a clear path of markers (or branches) to the
+                developer that, for all practical purposes, is the kernel needed for any given set
+                of requirements.
+            </para>
+        </section>
+
+        <section id='branching-and-workflow'>
+            <title>Branching Strategy and Workflow</title>
+            <para>
+                The Yocto Project team creates kernel branches at points where functionality is
+                no longer shared and thus, needs to be isolated.
+                For example, board-specific incompatibilities would require different functionality
+                and would require a branch to separate the features.
+                Likewise, for specific kernel features, the same branching strategy is used.
+            </para>
+            <para>
+                This branching strategy results in a tree that has features organized to be specific
+                for particular functionality, single kernel types, or a subset of kernel types.
+                This strategy also results in not having to store the same feature twice
+                internally in the tree.
+                Rather, the kernel team stores the unique differences required to apply the
+                feature onto the kernel type in question.
+                <note>
+                    The Yocto Project team strives to place features in the tree such that they can be
+                    shared by all boards and kernel types where possible.
+                    However, during development cycles or when large features are merged,
+                    the team cannot always follow this practice.
+                    In those cases, the team uses isolated branches to merge features.
+                </note>
+            </para>
+            <para>
+                BSP-specific code additions are handled in a similar manner to kernel-specific additions.
+                Some BSPs only make sense given certain kernel types.
+                So, for these types, the team creates branches off the end of that kernel type for all
+                of the BSPs that are supported on that kernel type.
+                From the perspective of the tools that create the BSP branch, the BSP is really no
+                different than a feature.
+                Consequently, the same branching strategy applies to BSPs as it does to features.
+                So again, rather than store the BSP twice, the team only stores the unique
+                differences for the BSP across the supported multiple kernels.
+            </para>
+            <para>
+                While this strategy can result in a tree with a significant number of branches, it is
+                important to realize that from the developer's point of view, there is a linear
+                path that travels from the baseline <filename>kernel.org</filename>, through a select
+                group of features and ends with their BSP-specific commits.
+                In other words, the divisions of the kernel are transparent and are not relevant
+                to the developer on a day-to-day basis.
+                From the developer's perspective, this path is the "master" branch.
+                The developer does not need to be aware of the existence of any other branches at all.
+                Of course, there is value in the existence of these branches
+                in the tree, should a person decide to explore them.
+                For example, a comparison between two BSPs at either the commit level or at the line-by-line
+                code <filename>diff</filename> level is now a trivial operation.
+            </para>
+            <para>
+                Working with the kernel as a structured tree follows recognized community best practices.
+                In particular, the kernel as shipped with the product, should be
+                considered an "upstream source" and viewed as a series of
+                historical and documented modifications (commits).
+                These modifications represent the development and stabilization done
+                by the Yocto Project kernel development team.
+            </para>
+            <para>
+                Because commits only change at significant release points in the product life cycle,
+                developers can work on a branch created
+                from the last relevant commit in the shipped Yocto Project kernel.
+                As mentioned previously, the structure is transparent to the developer
+                because the kernel tree is left in this state after cloning and building the kernel.
+            </para>
+        </section>
+
+        <section id='source-code-manager-git'>
+            <title>Source Code Manager - Git</title>
+            <para>
+                The Source Code Manager (SCM) is Git.
+                This SCM is the obvious mechanism for meeting the previously mentioned goals.
+                Not only is it the SCM for <filename>kernel.org</filename> but,
+                Git continues to grow in popularity and supports many different work flows,
+                front-ends and management techniques.
+            </para>
+            <para>
+                You can find documentation on Git at <ulink url='http://git-scm.com/documentation'></ulink>.
+                You can also get an introduction to Git as it applies to the Yocto Project in the
+                "<ulink url='&YOCTO_DOCS_DEV_URL;#git'>Git</ulink>"
+                section in the Yocto Project Development Manual.
+                These referenced sections overview Git and describe a minimal set of
+                commands that allows you to be functional using Git.
+                <note>
+                    You can use as much, or as little, of what Git has to offer to accomplish what
+                    you need for your project.
+                    You do not have to be a "Git Master" in order to use it with the Yocto Project.
+                </note>
+            </para>
+        </section>
+    </section>
+</appendix>
+<!--
+vim: expandtab tw=80 ts=4
+-->