meta-openembedded: refresh thud: 6094ae18c8..cca27b5ea7

Update meta-openembedded to thud HEAD.

Andreas Müller (4):
      libxklavier: Fix keyboard layout bug for xfce4-settings
      libmtp: upgrade 1.1.5 -> 1.1.16 and rework
      networkmanager: move udev-rules from /usr/lib -> /lib
      openjpeg: fix build for multilib

Ovidiu Panait (1):
      polkit: Fix CVE-2019-6133

Change-Id: I49e13eda2bea04302b8445c613d33e9e37228351
Signed-off-by: Brad Bishop <bradleyb@fuzziesquirrel.com>
diff --git a/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-extended/polkit/polkit/CVE-2019-6133.patch b/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-extended/polkit/polkit/CVE-2019-6133.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6fd20dc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-extended/polkit/polkit/CVE-2019-6133.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
+From 6cc6aafee135ba44ea748250d7d29b562ca190e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org>
+Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 14:24:48 -0500
+Subject: [PATCH] backend: Compare PolkitUnixProcess uids for temporary
+ authorizations
+
+It turns out that the combination of `(pid, start time)` is not
+enough to be unique.  For temporary authorizations, we can avoid
+separate users racing on pid reuse by simply comparing the uid.
+
+https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=1692
+
+And the above original email report is included in full in a new comment.
+
+Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
+
+Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/polkit/polkit/issues/75
+
+CVE: CVE-2019-6133
+Upstream-Status: Backport [https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/polkit/polkit.git]
+
+Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com>
+---
+ src/polkit/polkitsubject.c                    |  2 +
+ src/polkit/polkitunixprocess.c                | 71 ++++++++++++++++++-
+ .../polkitbackendinteractiveauthority.c       | 39 +++++++++-
+ 3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/src/polkit/polkitsubject.c b/src/polkit/polkitsubject.c
+index d4c1182..ccabd0a 100644
+--- a/src/polkit/polkitsubject.c
++++ b/src/polkit/polkitsubject.c
+@@ -99,6 +99,8 @@ polkit_subject_hash (PolkitSubject *subject)
+  * @b: A #PolkitSubject.
+  *
+  * Checks if @a and @b are equal, ie. represent the same subject.
++ * However, avoid calling polkit_subject_equal() to compare two processes;
++ * for more information see the `PolkitUnixProcess` documentation.
+  *
+  * This function can be used in e.g. g_hash_table_new().
+  *
+diff --git a/src/polkit/polkitunixprocess.c b/src/polkit/polkitunixprocess.c
+index b02b258..78d7251 100644
+--- a/src/polkit/polkitunixprocess.c
++++ b/src/polkit/polkitunixprocess.c
+@@ -51,7 +51,10 @@
+  * @title: PolkitUnixProcess
+  * @short_description: Unix processs
+  *
+- * An object for representing a UNIX process.
++ * An object for representing a UNIX process.  NOTE: This object as
++ * designed is now known broken; a mechanism to exploit a delay in
++ * start time in the Linux kernel was identified.  Avoid
++ * calling polkit_subject_equal() to compare two processes.
+  *
+  * To uniquely identify processes, both the process id and the start
+  * time of the process (a monotonic increasing value representing the
+@@ -66,6 +69,72 @@
+  * polkit_unix_process_new_for_owner() with trusted data.
+  */
+ 
++/* See https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/polkit/polkit/issues/75
++
++  But quoting the original email in full here to ensure it's preserved:
++
++  From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
++  Subject: [SECURITY] polkit: temporary auth hijacking via PID reuse and non-atomic fork
++  Date: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 5:34 PM
++
++When a (non-root) user attempts to e.g. control systemd units in the system
++instance from an active session over DBus, the access is gated by a polkit
++policy that requires "auth_admin_keep" auth. This results in an auth prompt
++being shown to the user, asking the user to confirm the action by entering the
++password of an administrator account.
++
++After the action has been confirmed, the auth decision for "auth_admin_keep" is
++cached for up to five minutes. Subject to some restrictions, similar actions can
++then be performed in this timespan without requiring re-auth:
++
++ - The PID of the DBus client requesting the new action must match the PID of
++   the DBus client requesting the old action (based on SO_PEERCRED information
++   forwarded by the DBus daemon).
++ - The "start time" of the client's PID (as seen in /proc/$pid/stat, field 22)
++   must not have changed. The granularity of this timestamp is in the
++   millisecond range.
++ - polkit polls every two seconds whether a process with the expected start time
++   still exists. If not, the temporary auth entry is purged.
++
++Without the start time check, this would obviously be buggy because an attacker
++could simply wait for the legitimate client to disappear, then create a new
++client with the same PID.
++
++Unfortunately, the start time check is bypassable because fork() is not atomic.
++Looking at the source code of copy_process() in the kernel:
++
++        p->start_time = ktime_get_ns();
++        p->real_start_time = ktime_get_boot_ns();
++        [...]
++        retval = copy_thread_tls(clone_flags, stack_start, stack_size, p, tls);
++        if (retval)
++                goto bad_fork_cleanup_io;
++
++        if (pid != &init_struct_pid) {
++                pid = alloc_pid(p->nsproxy->pid_ns_for_children);
++                if (IS_ERR(pid)) {
++                        retval = PTR_ERR(pid);
++                        goto bad_fork_cleanup_thread;
++                }
++        }
++
++The ktime_get_boot_ns() call is where the "start time" of the process is
++recorded. The alloc_pid() call is where a free PID is allocated. In between
++these, some time passes; and because the copy_thread_tls() call between them can
++access userspace memory when sys_clone() is invoked through the 32-bit syscall
++entry point, an attacker can even stall the kernel arbitrarily long at this
++point (by supplying a pointer into userspace memory that is associated with a
++userfaultfd or is backed by a custom FUSE filesystem).
++
++This means that an attacker can immediately call sys_clone() when the victim
++process is created, often resulting in a process that has the exact same start
++time reported in procfs; and then the attacker can delay the alloc_pid() call
++until after the victim process has died and the PID assignment has cycled
++around. This results in an attacker process that polkit can't distinguish from
++the victim process.
++*/
++
++
+ /**
+  * PolkitUnixProcess:
+  *
+diff --git a/src/polkitbackend/polkitbackendinteractiveauthority.c b/src/polkitbackend/polkitbackendinteractiveauthority.c
+index a1630b9..80e8141 100644
+--- a/src/polkitbackend/polkitbackendinteractiveauthority.c
++++ b/src/polkitbackend/polkitbackendinteractiveauthority.c
+@@ -3031,6 +3031,43 @@ temporary_authorization_store_free (TemporaryAuthorizationStore *store)
+   g_free (store);
+ }
+ 
++/* See the comment at the top of polkitunixprocess.c */
++static gboolean
++subject_equal_for_authz (PolkitSubject *a,
++                         PolkitSubject *b)
++{
++  if (!polkit_subject_equal (a, b))
++    return FALSE;
++
++  /* Now special case unix processes, as we want to protect against
++   * pid reuse by including the UID.
++   */
++  if (POLKIT_IS_UNIX_PROCESS (a) && POLKIT_IS_UNIX_PROCESS (b)) {
++    PolkitUnixProcess *ap = (PolkitUnixProcess*)a;
++    int uid_a = polkit_unix_process_get_uid ((PolkitUnixProcess*)a);
++    PolkitUnixProcess *bp = (PolkitUnixProcess*)b;
++    int uid_b = polkit_unix_process_get_uid ((PolkitUnixProcess*)b);
++
++    if (uid_a != -1 && uid_b != -1)
++      {
++        if (uid_a == uid_b)
++          {
++            return TRUE;
++          }
++        else
++          {
++            g_printerr ("denying slowfork; pid %d uid %d != %d!\n",
++                        polkit_unix_process_get_pid (ap),
++                        uid_a, uid_b);
++            return FALSE;
++          }
++      }
++    /* Fall through; one of the uids is unset so we can't reliably compare */
++  }
++
++  return TRUE;
++}
++
+ static gboolean
+ temporary_authorization_store_has_authorization (TemporaryAuthorizationStore *store,
+                                                  PolkitSubject               *subject,
+@@ -3073,7 +3110,7 @@ temporary_authorization_store_has_authorization (TemporaryAuthorizationStore *st
+     TemporaryAuthorization *authorization = l->data;
+ 
+     if (strcmp (action_id, authorization->action_id) == 0 &&
+-        polkit_subject_equal (subject_to_use, authorization->subject))
++        subject_equal_for_authz (subject_to_use, authorization->subject))
+       {
+         ret = TRUE;
+         if (out_tmp_authz_id != NULL)
+-- 
+2.20.1
+