blob: 908979804ab3ad8867b64b5968ac6576d2d0e352 [file] [log] [blame]
#
# SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
#
from oeqa.selftest.case import OESelftestTestCase
from oeqa.utils.commands import runCmd, bitbake, get_bb_var, get_bb_vars
from oeqa.utils.decorators import testcase
from oeqa.utils.ftools import write_file
import oe.recipeutils
class Distrodata(OESelftestTestCase):
def test_checkpkg(self):
"""
Summary: Test that upstream version checks do not regress
Expected: Upstream version checks should succeed except for the recipes listed in the exception list.
Product: oe-core
Author: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
"""
feature = 'LICENSE_FLAGS_WHITELIST += " commercial"\n'
self.write_config(feature)
pkgs = oe.recipeutils.get_recipe_upgrade_status()
regressed_failures = [pkg[0] for pkg in pkgs if pkg[1] == 'UNKNOWN_BROKEN']
regressed_successes = [pkg[0] for pkg in pkgs if pkg[1] == 'KNOWN_BROKEN']
msg = ""
if len(regressed_failures) > 0:
msg = msg + """
The following packages failed upstream version checks. Please fix them using UPSTREAM_CHECK_URI/UPSTREAM_CHECK_REGEX
(when using tarballs) or UPSTREAM_CHECK_GITTAGREGEX (when using git). If an upstream version check cannot be performed
(for example, if upstream does not use git tags), you can set UPSTREAM_VERSION_UNKNOWN to '1' in the recipe to acknowledge
that the check cannot be performed.
""" + "\n".join(regressed_failures)
if len(regressed_successes) > 0:
msg = msg + """
The following packages have been checked successfully for upstream versions,
but their recipes claim otherwise by setting UPSTREAM_VERSION_UNKNOWN. Please remove that line from the recipes.
""" + "\n".join(regressed_successes)
self.assertTrue(len(regressed_failures) == 0 and len(regressed_successes) == 0, msg)
def test_missing_homepg(self):
"""
Summary: Test for oe-core recipes that don't have a HOMEPAGE or DESCRIPTION
Expected: All oe-core recipes should have a DESCRIPTION entry
Expected: All oe-core recipes should have a HOMEPAGE entry except for recipes that are not fetched from external sources.
Product: oe-core
"""
with bb.tinfoil.Tinfoil() as tinfoil:
tinfoil.prepare(config_only=False)
no_description = []
no_homepage = []
for fn in tinfoil.all_recipe_files(variants=False):
if not '/meta/recipes-' in fn:
# We are only interested in OE-Core
continue
rd = tinfoil.parse_recipe_file(fn, appends=False)
pn = rd.getVar('BPN')
srcfile = rd.getVar('SRC_URI').split()
#Since DESCRIPTION defaults to SUMMARY if not set, we are only interested in recipes without DESCRIPTION or SUMMARY
if not (rd.getVar('SUMMARY') or rd.getVar('DESCRIPTION')):
no_description.append((pn, fn))
if not rd.getVar('HOMEPAGE'):
if srcfile and srcfile[0].startswith('file') or not rd.getVar('SRC_URI'):
# We are only interested in recipes SRC_URI fetched from external sources
continue
no_homepage.append((pn, fn))
if no_homepage:
self.fail("""
The following recipes do not have a HOMEPAGE. Please add an entry for HOMEPAGE in the recipe.
""" + "\n".join(['%s (%s)' % i for i in no_homepage]))
if no_description:
self.fail("""
The following recipes do not have a DESCRIPTION. Please add an entry for DESCRIPTION in the recipe.
""" + "\n".join(['%s (%s)' % i for i in no_description]))
def test_maintainers(self):
"""
Summary: Test that oe-core recipes have a maintainer and entries in maintainers list have a recipe
Expected: All oe-core recipes (except a few special static/testing ones) should have a maintainer listed in maintainers.inc file.
Expected: All entries in maintainers list should have a recipe file that matches them
Product: oe-core
Author: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
"""
def is_exception(pkg):
exceptions = ["packagegroup-", "initramfs-", "systemd-machine-units", "target-sdk-provides-dummy"]
for i in exceptions:
if i in pkg:
return True
return False
def is_maintainer_exception(entry):
exceptions = ["musl", "newlib", "linux-yocto", "linux-dummy", "mesa-gl", "libgfortran",
"cve-update-db-native", "rust"]
for i in exceptions:
if i in entry:
return True
return False
feature = 'require conf/distro/include/maintainers.inc\nLICENSE_FLAGS_WHITELIST += " commercial"\nPARSE_ALL_RECIPES = "1"\nPACKAGE_CLASSES = "package_ipk package_deb package_rpm"\n'
self.write_config(feature)
with bb.tinfoil.Tinfoil() as tinfoil:
tinfoil.prepare(config_only=False)
with_maintainer_list = []
no_maintainer_list = []
missing_recipes = []
recipes = []
prefix = "RECIPE_MAINTAINER:pn-"
# We could have used all_recipes() here, but this method will find
# every recipe if we ever move to setting RECIPE_MAINTAINER in recipe files
# instead of maintainers.inc
for fn in tinfoil.all_recipe_files(variants=False):
if not '/meta/recipes-' in fn:
# We are only interested in OE-Core
continue
rd = tinfoil.parse_recipe_file(fn, appends=False)
pn = rd.getVar('PN')
recipes.append(pn)
if is_exception(pn):
continue
if rd.getVar('RECIPE_MAINTAINER'):
with_maintainer_list.append((pn, fn))
else:
no_maintainer_list.append((pn, fn))
maintainers = tinfoil.config_data.keys()
for key in maintainers:
if key.startswith(prefix):
recipe = tinfoil.config_data.expand(key[len(prefix):])
if is_maintainer_exception(recipe):
continue
if recipe not in recipes:
missing_recipes.append(recipe)
if no_maintainer_list:
self.fail("""
The following recipes do not have a maintainer assigned to them. Please add an entry to meta/conf/distro/include/maintainers.inc file.
""" + "\n".join(['%s (%s)' % i for i in no_maintainer_list]))
if not with_maintainer_list:
self.fail("""
The list of oe-core recipes with maintainers is empty. This may indicate that the test has regressed and needs fixing.
""")
if missing_recipes:
self.fail("""
Unable to find recipes for the following entries in maintainers.inc:
""" + "\n".join(['%s' % i for i in missing_recipes]))