Rename chip data attention types to be more descriptive
Instead of CS, UCS, RE, SPA, and HA, using CHIP_CS, UNIT_CS, RECOV,
SP_ATTN, and HOST_ATTN. This is mostly in an effort to clarify a chip
checkstop is not necessarily a system checkstop. Notice that I didn't
change any of the register names for P10 or Explorer. This is to prevent
the inevitable code level mismatches between drivers and the peltool
parsers used to parse field data.
Signed-off-by: Zane Shelley <zshelle@us.ibm.com>
Change-Id: I35698b7a1b9d3bbefeb1ccc7ccc242890fe221f3
diff --git a/chip_data/p10_20/node_cfir_n0.json b/chip_data/p10_20/node_cfir_n0.json
index e729158..8d4e9e6 100644
--- a/chip_data/p10_20/node_cfir_n0.json
+++ b/chip_data/p10_20/node_cfir_n0.json
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
"instances": [0],
"rules": [
{
- "attn_type": ["CS"],
+ "attn_type": ["CHIP_CS"],
"node_inst": [0],
"expr": {
"expr_type": "and",
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@
"instances": [0],
"rules": [
{
- "attn_type": ["RE"],
+ "attn_type": ["RECOV"],
"node_inst": [0],
"expr": {
"expr_type": "and",
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@
"instances": [0],
"rules": [
{
- "attn_type": ["SPA"],
+ "attn_type": ["SP_ATTN"],
"node_inst": [0],
"expr": {
"expr_type": "and",
@@ -349,7 +349,7 @@
"instances": [0],
"rules": [
{
- "attn_type": ["UCS"],
+ "attn_type": ["UNIT_CS"],
"node_inst": [0],
"expr": {
"expr_type": "and",
@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@
"instances": [0],
"rules": [
{
- "attn_type": ["HA"],
+ "attn_type": ["HOST_ATTN"],
"node_inst": [0],
"expr": {
"expr_type": "and",