diff --git a/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/lua/lua/0001-Fixed-bug-barriers-cannot-be-active-during-sweep.patch b/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/lua/lua/0001-Fixed-bug-barriers-cannot-be-active-during-sweep.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a302874
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/lua/lua/0001-Fixed-bug-barriers-cannot-be-active-during-sweep.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+From 1e6df25ac28dcd89f0324177bb55019422404b44 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@inf.puc-rio.br>
+Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 15:32:17 +0800
+Subject: [PATCH] Fixed bug: barriers cannot be active during sweep
+
+Barriers cannot be active during sweep, even in generational mode.
+(Although gen. mode is not incremental, it can hit a barrier when
+deleting a thread and closing its upvalues.)  The colors of objects are
+being changed during sweep and, therefore, cannot be trusted.
+
+Upstream-Status: Backport [https://github.com/lua/lua/commit/a6da1472c0c5e05ff249325f979531ad51533110]
+CVE: CVE-2020-24371
+
+[Adjust code KGC_INC -> KGC_NORMAL, refer 69371c4b84becac09c445aae01d005b49658ef82]
+Signed-off-by: Wenlin Kang <wenlin.kang@windriver.com>
+---
+ src/lgc.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
+ 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/src/lgc.c b/src/lgc.c
+index 973c269..7af23d5 100644
+--- a/src/lgc.c
++++ b/src/lgc.c
+@@ -142,10 +142,17 @@ static int iscleared (global_State *g, const TValue *o) {
+ 
+ 
+ /*
+-** barrier that moves collector forward, that is, mark the white object
+-** being pointed by a black object. (If in sweep phase, clear the black
+-** object to white [sweep it] to avoid other barrier calls for this
+-** same object.)
++** Barrier that moves collector forward, that is, marks the white object
++** 'v' being pointed by the black object 'o'.  In the generational
++** mode, 'v' must also become old, if 'o' is old; however, it cannot
++** be changed directly to OLD, because it may still point to non-old
++** objects. So, it is marked as OLD0. In the next cycle it will become
++** OLD1, and in the next it will finally become OLD (regular old). By
++** then, any object it points to will also be old.  If called in the
++** incremental sweep phase, it clears the black object to white (sweep
++** it) to avoid other barrier calls for this same object. (That cannot
++** be done is generational mode, as its sweep does not distinguish
++** whites from deads.)
+ */
+ void luaC_barrier_ (lua_State *L, GCObject *o, GCObject *v) {
+   global_State *g = G(L);
+@@ -154,7 +161,8 @@ void luaC_barrier_ (lua_State *L, GCObject *o, GCObject *v) {
+     reallymarkobject(g, v);  /* restore invariant */
+   else {  /* sweep phase */
+     lua_assert(issweepphase(g));
+-    makewhite(g, o);  /* mark main obj. as white to avoid other barriers */
++    if (g->gckind == KGC_NORMAL)  /* incremental mode? */
++      makewhite(g, o);  /* mark 'o' as white to avoid other barriers */
+   }
+ }
+ 
+@@ -299,10 +307,15 @@ static void markbeingfnz (global_State *g) {
+ 
+ 
+ /*
+-** Mark all values stored in marked open upvalues from non-marked threads.
+-** (Values from marked threads were already marked when traversing the
+-** thread.) Remove from the list threads that no longer have upvalues and
+-** not-marked threads.
++** For each non-marked thread, simulates a barrier between each open
++** upvalue and its value. (If the thread is collected, the value will be
++** assigned to the upvalue, but then it can be too late for the barrier
++** to act. The "barrier" does not need to check colors: A non-marked
++** thread must be young; upvalues cannot be older than their threads; so
++** any visited upvalue must be young too.) Also removes the thread from
++** the list, as it was already visited. Removes also threads with no
++** upvalues, as they have nothing to be checked. (If the thread gets an
++** upvalue later, it will be linked in the list again.)
+ */
+ static void remarkupvals (global_State *g) {
+   lua_State *thread;
+@@ -313,9 +326,11 @@ static void remarkupvals (global_State *g) {
+       p = &thread->twups;  /* keep marked thread with upvalues in the list */
+     else {  /* thread is not marked or without upvalues */
+       UpVal *uv;
++      lua_assert(!isold(thread) || thread->openupval == NULL);
+       *p = thread->twups;  /* remove thread from the list */
+       thread->twups = thread;  /* mark that it is out of list */
+       for (uv = thread->openupval; uv != NULL; uv = uv->u.open.next) {
++        lua_assert(getage(uv) <= getage(thread));
+         if (uv->u.open.touched) {
+           markvalue(g, uv->v);  /* remark upvalue's value */
+           uv->u.open.touched = 0;
+-- 
+1.9.1
+
diff --git a/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/lua/lua/CVE-2020-15945.patch b/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/lua/lua/CVE-2020-15945.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..89ce491
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/lua/lua/CVE-2020-15945.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
+From d8d344365945a534f700c82c5dd26f704f89fef3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@inf.puc-rio.br>
+Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 16:59:58 +0800
+Subject: [PATCH] Fixed bug: invalid 'oldpc' when returning to a function
+
+The field 'L->oldpc' is not always updated when control returns to a
+function; an invalid value can seg. fault when computing 'changedline'.
+(One example is an error in a finalizer; control can return to
+'luaV_execute' without executing 'luaD_poscall'.) Instead of trying to
+fix all possible corner cases, it seems safer to be resilient to invalid
+values for 'oldpc'. Valid but wrong values at most cause an extra call
+to a line hook.
+
+CVE: CVE-2020-15945
+
+[Adjust the code to be applicable to the tree]
+
+Upstream-Status: Backport [https://github.com/lua/lua/commit/a2195644d89812e5b157ce7bac35543e06db05e3]
+
+Signed-off-by: Wenlin Kang <wenlin.kang@windriver.com>
+Signed-off-by: Joe Slater <joe.slater@@windriver.com>
+
+---
+ src/ldebug.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
+ src/ldebug.h |  4 ++++
+ src/ldo.c    |  2 +-
+ src/lstate.c |  1 +
+ src/lstate.h |  2 +-
+ 5 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/src/ldebug.c b/src/ldebug.c
+index 239affb..832b16c 100644
+--- a/src/ldebug.c
++++ b/src/ldebug.c
+@@ -34,9 +34,8 @@
+ #define noLuaClosure(f)		((f) == NULL || (f)->c.tt == LUA_TCCL)
+ 
+ 
+-/* Active Lua function (given call info) */
+-#define ci_func(ci)		(clLvalue((ci)->func))
+-
++/* inverse of 'pcRel' */
++#define invpcRel(pc, p)                ((p)->code + (pc) + 1)
+ 
+ static const char *funcnamefromcode (lua_State *L, CallInfo *ci,
+                                     const char **name);
+@@ -71,20 +70,18 @@ static void swapextra (lua_State *L) {
+ 
+ /*
+ ** This function can be called asynchronously (e.g. during a signal).
+-** Fields 'oldpc', 'basehookcount', and 'hookcount' (set by
+-** 'resethookcount') are for debug only, and it is no problem if they
+-** get arbitrary values (causes at most one wrong hook call). 'hookmask'
+-** is an atomic value. We assume that pointers are atomic too (e.g., gcc
+-** ensures that for all platforms where it runs). Moreover, 'hook' is
+-** always checked before being called (see 'luaD_hook').
++** Fields 'basehookcount' and 'hookcount' (set by 'resethookcount')
++** are for debug only, and it is no problem if they get arbitrary
++** values (causes at most one wrong hook call). 'hookmask' is an atomic
++** value. We assume that pointers are atomic too (e.g., gcc ensures that
++** for all platforms where it runs). Moreover, 'hook' is always checked
++** before being called (see 'luaD_hook').
+ */
+ LUA_API void lua_sethook (lua_State *L, lua_Hook func, int mask, int count) {
+   if (func == NULL || mask == 0) {  /* turn off hooks? */
+     mask = 0;
+     func = NULL;
+   }
+-  if (isLua(L->ci))
+-    L->oldpc = L->ci->u.l.savedpc;
+   L->hook = func;
+   L->basehookcount = count;
+   resethookcount(L);
+@@ -665,7 +662,10 @@ l_noret luaG_runerror (lua_State *L, const char *fmt, ...) {
+ void luaG_traceexec (lua_State *L) {
+   CallInfo *ci = L->ci;
+   lu_byte mask = L->hookmask;
++  const Proto *p = ci_func(ci)->p;
+   int counthook = (--L->hookcount == 0 && (mask & LUA_MASKCOUNT));
++  /* 'L->oldpc' may be invalid; reset it in this case */
++  int oldpc = (L->oldpc < p->sizecode) ? L->oldpc : 0;
+   if (counthook)
+     resethookcount(L);  /* reset count */
+   else if (!(mask & LUA_MASKLINE))
+@@ -677,15 +677,15 @@ void luaG_traceexec (lua_State *L) {
+   if (counthook)
+     luaD_hook(L, LUA_HOOKCOUNT, -1);  /* call count hook */
+   if (mask & LUA_MASKLINE) {
+-    Proto *p = ci_func(ci)->p;
+     int npc = pcRel(ci->u.l.savedpc, p);
+     int newline = getfuncline(p, npc);
+     if (npc == 0 ||  /* call linehook when enter a new function, */
+-        ci->u.l.savedpc <= L->oldpc ||  /* when jump back (loop), or when */
+-        newline != getfuncline(p, pcRel(L->oldpc, p)))  /* enter a new line */
++        ci->u.l.savedpc <= invpcRel(oldpc, p) ||  /* when jump back (loop), or when */
++        newline != getfuncline(p, oldpc))  /* enter a new line */
+       luaD_hook(L, LUA_HOOKLINE, newline);  /* call line hook */
++
++    L->oldpc = npc;  /* 'pc' of last call to line hook */
+   }
+-  L->oldpc = ci->u.l.savedpc;
+   if (L->status == LUA_YIELD) {  /* did hook yield? */
+     if (counthook)
+       L->hookcount = 1;  /* undo decrement to zero */
+diff --git a/src/ldebug.h b/src/ldebug.h
+index 0e31546..c224cc4 100644
+--- a/src/ldebug.h
++++ b/src/ldebug.h
+@@ -13,6 +13,10 @@
+ 
+ #define pcRel(pc, p)	(cast(int, (pc) - (p)->code) - 1)
+ 
++/* Active Lua function (given call info) */
++#define ci_func(ci)            (clLvalue((ci)->func))
++
++
+ #define getfuncline(f,pc)	(((f)->lineinfo) ? (f)->lineinfo[pc] : -1)
+ 
+ #define resethookcount(L)	(L->hookcount = L->basehookcount)
+diff --git a/src/ldo.c b/src/ldo.c
+index 90b695f..f66ac1a 100644
+--- a/src/ldo.c
++++ b/src/ldo.c
+@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ int luaD_poscall (lua_State *L, CallInfo *ci, StkId firstResult, int nres) {
+       luaD_hook(L, LUA_HOOKRET, -1);
+       firstResult = restorestack(L, fr);
+     }
+-    L->oldpc = ci->previous->u.l.savedpc;  /* 'oldpc' for caller function */
++    L->oldpc = pcRel(ci->u.l.savedpc, ci_func(ci)->p);  /* 'oldpc' for caller function */
+   }
+   res = ci->func;  /* res == final position of 1st result */
+   L->ci = ci->previous;  /* back to caller */
+diff --git a/src/lstate.c b/src/lstate.c
+index 9194ac3..3573e36 100644
+--- a/src/lstate.c
++++ b/src/lstate.c
+@@ -236,6 +236,7 @@ static void preinit_thread (lua_State *L, global_State *g) {
+   L->nny = 1;
+   L->status = LUA_OK;
+   L->errfunc = 0;
++  L->oldpc = 0;
+ }
+ 
+ 
+diff --git a/src/lstate.h b/src/lstate.h
+index a469466..d75eadf 100644
+--- a/src/lstate.h
++++ b/src/lstate.h
+@@ -164,7 +164,6 @@ struct lua_State {
+   StkId top;  /* first free slot in the stack */
+   global_State *l_G;
+   CallInfo *ci;  /* call info for current function */
+-  const Instruction *oldpc;  /* last pc traced */
+   StkId stack_last;  /* last free slot in the stack */
+   StkId stack;  /* stack base */
+   UpVal *openupval;  /* list of open upvalues in this stack */
+@@ -174,6 +173,7 @@ struct lua_State {
+   CallInfo base_ci;  /* CallInfo for first level (C calling Lua) */
+   volatile lua_Hook hook;
+   ptrdiff_t errfunc;  /* current error handling function (stack index) */
++  int oldpc;  /* last pc traced */
+   int stacksize;
+   int basehookcount;
+   int hookcount;
+-- 
+2.13.3
+
diff --git a/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/lua/lua_5.3.5.bb b/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/lua/lua_5.3.5.bb
index d3461b0..7d84ea6 100644
--- a/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/lua/lua_5.3.5.bb
+++ b/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/lua/lua_5.3.5.bb
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
            file://lua.pc.in \
            file://0001-Allow-building-lua-without-readline-on-Linux.patch \
            file://CVE-2020-15888.patch \
+           file://CVE-2020-15945.patch \
+           file://0001-Fixed-bug-barriers-cannot-be-active-during-sweep.patch \
            "
 
 # if no test suite matches PV release of Lua exactly, download the suite for the closest Lua release.