commit 9bbf333d0c4b6bb47959ef6d0395949fa0fe386c
author Patrick Venture <venture@google.com> Tue Jul 16 10:50:37 2019 -0700
committer Patrick Venture <venture@google.com> Tue Jul 16 21:16:01 2019 +0000
tree 8d588feccb919432d51c041d7bc304ba7eb373ca
parent 924dd965ed01e0c09bef4520f754d0d1a10e7ad3

rename RPMSetPoint to SetPoint

The PIDs were originally focused on collecting RPM set points from
thermal PIDs and then having fan PIDs use the highest value collected,
it doesn't need to be strictly an RPM set point.

It does however need to be one type of value.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Venture <venture@google.com>
Change-Id: I1d589cf4b2688d7e86030c10496d737dc5bbdadf

test/pid_stepwisecontroller_unittest.cpp

diff --git a/test/pid_stepwisecontroller_unittest.cpp b/test/pid_stepwisecontroller_unittest.cpp
index 5cf825d..f5f6f9a 100644
--- a/test/pid_stepwisecontroller_unittest.cpp
+++ b/test/pid_stepwisecontroller_unittest.cpp
@@ -39,8 +39,8 @@
         .WillOnce(Return(31.0))  // return 40
         .WillOnce(Return(32.0)); // return 60
 
-    EXPECT_CALL(z, addRPMSetPoint(40.0)).Times(2);
-    EXPECT_CALL(z, addRPMSetPoint(60.0)).Times(1);
+    EXPECT_CALL(z, addSetPoint(40.0)).Times(2);
+    EXPECT_CALL(z, addSetPoint(60.0)).Times(1);
 
     for (int ii = 0; ii < 3; ii++)
     {
@@ -75,8 +75,8 @@
         .WillOnce(Return(27.0))  // return 60
         .WillOnce(Return(26.0)); // return 40
 
-    EXPECT_CALL(z, addRPMSetPoint(40.0)).Times(1);
-    EXPECT_CALL(z, addRPMSetPoint(60.0)).Times(2);
+    EXPECT_CALL(z, addSetPoint(40.0)).Times(1);
+    EXPECT_CALL(z, addSetPoint(60.0)).Times(2);
 
     for (int ii = 0; ii < 3; ii++)
     {