| .. SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-2.0-UK |
| |
| ***************************************************** |
| Yocto Project Releases and the Stable Release Process |
| ***************************************************** |
| |
| The Yocto Project release process is predictable and consists of both |
| major and minor (point) releases. This brief chapter provides |
| information on how releases are named, their life cycle, and their |
| stability. |
| |
| Major and Minor Release Cadence |
| =============================== |
| |
| The Yocto Project delivers major releases (e.g. &DISTRO;) using a six |
| month cadence roughly timed each April and October of the year. |
| Following are examples of some major YP releases with their codenames |
| also shown. See the ":ref:`ref-manual/release-process:major release codenames`" |
| section for information on codenames used with major releases. |
| |
| - 4.1 ("Langdale") |
| - 4.0 ("Kirkstone") |
| - 3.4 ("Honister") |
| |
| While the cadence is never perfect, this timescale facilitates |
| regular releases that have strong QA cycles while not overwhelming users |
| with too many new releases. The cadence is predictable and avoids many |
| major holidays in various geographies. |
| |
| The Yocto project delivers minor (point) releases on an unscheduled |
| basis and are usually driven by the accumulation of enough significant |
| fixes or enhancements to the associated major release. Following are |
| some example past point releases: |
| |
| - 4.1.3 |
| - 4.0.8 |
| - 3.4.4 |
| |
| The point release |
| indicates a point in the major release branch where a full QA cycle and |
| release process validates the content of the new branch. |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| Realize that there can be patches merged onto the stable release |
| branches as and when they become available. |
| |
| Major Release Codenames |
| ======================= |
| |
| Each major release receives a codename that identifies the release in |
| the :ref:`overview-manual/development-environment:yocto project source repositories`. |
| The concept is that branches of :term:`Metadata` with the same |
| codename are likely to be compatible and thus work together. |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| Codenames are associated with major releases because a Yocto Project |
| release number (e.g. &DISTRO;) could conflict with a given layer or |
| company versioning scheme. Codenames are unique, interesting, and |
| easily identifiable. |
| |
| Releases are given a nominal release version as well but the codename is |
| used in repositories for this reason. You can find information on Yocto |
| Project releases and codenames at :yocto_wiki:`/Releases`. |
| |
| Our :doc:`/migration-guides/index` detail how to migrate from one release of |
| the Yocto Project to the next. |
| |
| Stable Release Process |
| ====================== |
| |
| Once released, the release enters the stable release process at which |
| time a person is assigned as the maintainer for that stable release. |
| This maintainer monitors activity for the release by investigating and |
| handling nominated patches and backport activity. Only fixes and |
| enhancements that have first been applied on the "master" branch (i.e. |
| the current, in-development branch) are considered for backporting to a |
| stable release. |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| The current Yocto Project policy regarding backporting is to consider |
| bug fixes and security fixes only. Policy dictates that features are |
| not backported to a stable release. This policy means generic recipe |
| version upgrades are unlikely to be accepted for backporting. The |
| exception to this policy occurs when there is a strong reason such as |
| the fix happens to also be the preferred upstream approach. |
| |
| .. _ref-long-term-support-releases: |
| |
| Long Term Support Releases |
| ========================== |
| |
| While stable releases are supported for a duration of seven months, |
| some specific ones are now supported for a longer period by the Yocto |
| Project, and are called Long Term Support (:term:`LTS`) releases. |
| |
| This started with version 3.1 ("Dunfell"), released in April 2020, that |
| the project committed to supporting until the next :term:`LTS` release was out. |
| This next :term:`LTS` release, version 4.0 ("Kirkstone"), was released in May 2022 |
| and offered with two years of support too. |
| |
| However, as an experiment, support for "Dunfell" was extended to four years, until |
| April 2024, therefore offering more stability to projects and leaving more time |
| to upgrade to the latest :term:`LTS` release. The project hasn't made any commitment to |
| extending "Kirkstone" support too, as this will also depend on available funding |
| for such an effort. |
| |
| When significant issues are found, :term:`LTS` releases allow to publish |
| fixes not only for the current stable release, but also to the |
| :term:`LTS` releases that are still supported. Older stable releases which |
| have reached their End of Life (EOL) won't receive such updates. |
| |
| See :yocto_wiki:`/Stable_Release_and_LTS` for details about the management |
| of stable and :term:`LTS` releases. |
| |
| .. image:: svg/releases.* |
| :width: 100% |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| In some circumstances, a layer can be created by the community in order to |
| add a specific feature or support a new version of some package for an :term:`LTS` |
| release. This is called a :term:`Mixin` layer. These are thin and specific |
| purpose layers which can be stacked with an :term:`LTS` release to "mix" a specific |
| feature into that build. These are created on an as-needed basis and |
| maintained by the people who need them. |
| |
| Policies on testing these layers depend on how widespread their usage is and |
| determined on a case-by-case basis. You can find some :term:`Mixin` layers in the |
| :yocto_git:`meta-lts-mixins </meta-lts-mixins>` repository. While the Yocto |
| Project provides hosting for those repositories, it does not provides |
| testing on them. Other :term:`Mixin` layers may be released elsewhere by the wider |
| community. |
| |
| Testing and Quality Assurance |
| ============================= |
| |
| Part of the Yocto Project development and release process is quality |
| assurance through the execution of test strategies. Test strategies |
| provide the Yocto Project team a way to ensure a release is validated. |
| Additionally, because the test strategies are visible to you as a |
| developer, you can validate your projects. This section overviews the |
| available test infrastructure used in the Yocto Project. For information |
| on how to run available tests on your projects, see the |
| ":ref:`dev-manual/runtime-testing:performing automated runtime testing`" |
| section in the Yocto Project Development Tasks Manual. |
| |
| The QA/testing infrastructure is woven into the project to the point |
| where core developers take some of it for granted. The infrastructure |
| consists of the following pieces: |
| |
| - ``bitbake-selftest``: A standalone command that runs unit tests on |
| key pieces of BitBake and its fetchers. |
| |
| - :ref:`ref-classes-sanity`: This automatically |
| included class checks the build environment for missing tools (e.g. |
| ``gcc``) or common misconfigurations such as |
| :term:`MACHINE` set incorrectly. |
| |
| - :ref:`ref-classes-insane`: This class checks the |
| generated output from builds for sanity. For example, if building for |
| an ARM target, did the build produce ARM binaries. If, for example, |
| the build produced PPC binaries then there is a problem. |
| |
| - :ref:`ref-classes-testimage`: This class |
| performs runtime testing of images after they are built. The tests |
| are usually used with :doc:`QEMU </dev-manual/qemu>` |
| to boot the images and check the combined runtime result boot |
| operation and functions. However, the test can also use the IP |
| address of a machine to test. |
| |
| - :ref:`ptest <dev-manual/packages:testing packages with ptest>`: |
| Runs tests against packages produced during the build for a given |
| piece of software. The test allows the packages to be run within a |
| target image. |
| |
| - ``oe-selftest``: Tests combination BitBake invocations. These tests |
| operate outside the OpenEmbedded build system itself. The |
| ``oe-selftest`` can run all tests by default or can run selected |
| tests or test suites. |
| |
| Originally, much of this testing was done manually. However, significant |
| effort has been made to automate the tests so that more people can use |
| them and the Yocto Project development team can run them faster and more |
| efficiently. |
| |
| The Yocto Project's main Autobuilder (&YOCTO_AB_URL;) publicly tests each Yocto |
| Project release's code in the :oe_git:`openembedded-core </openembedded-core>`, |
| :yocto_git:`poky </poky>` and :oe_git:`bitbake </bitbake>` repositories. The |
| testing occurs for both the current state of the "master" branch and also for |
| submitted patches. Testing for submitted patches usually occurs in the |
| in the "master-next" branch in the :yocto_git:`poky </poky>` repository. |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| You can find all these branches in the |
| :ref:`overview-manual/development-environment:yocto project source repositories`. |
| |
| Testing within these public branches ensures in a publicly visible way |
| that all of the main supposed architectures and recipes in OE-Core |
| successfully build and behave properly. |
| |
| Various features such as ``multilib``, sub architectures (e.g. ``x32``, |
| ``poky-tiny``, ``musl``, ``no-x11`` and and so forth), |
| ``bitbake-selftest``, and ``oe-selftest`` are tested as part of the QA |
| process of a release. Complete testing and validation for a release |
| takes the Autobuilder workers several hours. |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| The Autobuilder workers are non-homogeneous, which means regular |
| testing across a variety of Linux distributions occurs. The |
| Autobuilder is limited to only testing QEMU-based setups and not real |
| hardware. |
| |
| Finally, in addition to the Autobuilder's tests, the Yocto Project QA |
| team also performs testing on a variety of platforms, which includes |
| actual hardware, to ensure expected results. |