| .. SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-2.0-UK |
| |
| *********************************** |
| Project Testing and Release Process |
| *********************************** |
| |
| .. _test-daily-devel: |
| |
| Day to Day Development |
| ====================== |
| |
| This section details how the project tests changes, through automation |
| on the Autobuilder or with the assistance of QA teams, through to making |
| releases. |
| |
| The project aims to test changes against our test matrix before those |
| changes are merged into the master branch. As such, changes are queued |
| up in batches either in the ``master-next`` branch in the main trees, or |
| in user trees such as ``ross/mut`` in ``poky-contrib`` (Ross Burton |
| helps review and test patches and this is his testing tree). |
| |
| We have two broad categories of test builds, including "full" and |
| "quick". On the Autobuilder, these can be seen as "a-quick" and |
| "a-full", simply for ease of sorting in the UI. Use our Autobuilder |
| console view to see where me manage most test-related items, available |
| at: :yocto_ab:`/typhoon/#/console`. |
| |
| Builds are triggered manually when the test branches are ready. The |
| builds are monitored by the SWAT team. For additional information, see |
| :yocto_wiki:`/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team`. |
| If successful, the changes would usually be merged to the ``master`` |
| branch. If not successful, someone would respond to the changes on the |
| mailing list explaining that there was a failure in testing. The choice |
| of quick or full would depend on the type of changes and the speed with |
| which the result was required. |
| |
| The Autobuilder does build the ``master`` branch once daily for several |
| reasons, in particular, to ensure the current ``master`` branch does |
| build, but also to keep ``yocto-testresults`` |
| (:yocto_git:`/cgit.cgi/yocto-testresults/`), |
| buildhistory |
| (:yocto_git:`/cgit.cgi/poky-buildhistory/`), and |
| our sstate up to date. On the weekend, there is a master-next build |
| instead to ensure the test results are updated for the less frequently |
| run targets. |
| |
| Performance builds (buildperf-\* targets in the console) are triggered |
| separately every six hours and automatically push their results to the |
| buildstats repository at: |
| :yocto_git:`/cgit.cgi/yocto-buildstats/`. |
| |
| The 'quick' targets have been selected to be the ones which catch the |
| most failures or give the most valuable data. We run 'fast' ptests in |
| this case for example but not the ones which take a long time. The quick |
| target doesn't include \*-lsb builds for all architectures, some world |
| builds and doesn't trigger performance tests or ltp testing. The full |
| build includes all these things and is slower but more comprehensive. |
| |
| Release Builds |
| ============== |
| |
| The project typically has two major releases a year with a six month |
| cadence in April and October. Between these there would be a number of |
| milestone releases (usually four) with the final one being stablization |
| only along with point releases of our stable branches. |
| |
| The build and release process for these project releases is similar to |
| that in `Day to Day Development <#test-daily-devel>`__, in that the |
| a-full target of the Autobuilder is used but in addition the form is |
| configured to generate and publish artefacts and the milestone number, |
| version, release candidate number and other information is entered. The |
| box to "generate an email to QA"is also checked. |
| |
| When the build completes, an email is sent out using the send-qa-email |
| script in the ``yocto-autobuilder-helper`` repository to the list of |
| people configured for that release. Release builds are placed into a |
| directory in https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases on the |
| Autobuilder which is included in the email. The process from here is |
| more manual and control is effectively passed to release engineering. |
| The next steps include: |
| |
| - QA teams respond to the email saying which tests they plan to run and |
| when the results will be available. |
| |
| - QA teams run their tests and share their results in the yocto- |
| testresults-contrib repository, along with a summary of their |
| findings. |
| |
| - Release engineering prepare the release as per their process. |
| |
| - Test results from the QA teams are included into the release in |
| separate directories and also uploaded to the yocto-testresults |
| repository alongside the other test results for the given revision. |
| |
| - The QA report in the final release is regenerated using resulttool to |
| include the new test results and the test summaries from the teams |
| (as headers to the generated report). |
| |
| - The release is checked against the release checklist and release |
| readiness criteria. |
| |
| - A final decision on whether to release is made by the YP TSC who have |
| final oversight on release readiness. |