| .. SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-2.0-UK |
| |
| ************************ |
| Advanced Kernel Concepts |
| ************************ |
| |
| .. _kernel-big-picture: |
| |
| Yocto Project Kernel Development and Maintenance |
| ================================================ |
| |
| Kernels available through the Yocto Project (Yocto Linux kernels), like |
| other kernels, are based off the Linux kernel releases from |
| http://www.kernel.org. At the beginning of a major Linux kernel |
| development cycle, the Yocto Project team chooses a Linux kernel based |
| on factors such as release timing, the anticipated release timing of |
| final upstream ``kernel.org`` versions, and Yocto Project feature |
| requirements. Typically, the Linux kernel chosen is in the final stages |
| of development by the Linux community. In other words, the Linux kernel |
| is in the release candidate or "rc" phase and has yet to reach final |
| release. But, by being in the final stages of external development, the |
| team knows that the ``kernel.org`` final release will clearly be within |
| the early stages of the Yocto Project development window. |
| |
| This balance allows the Yocto Project team to deliver the most |
| up-to-date Yocto Linux kernel possible, while still ensuring that the |
| team has a stable official release for the baseline Linux kernel |
| version. |
| |
| As implied earlier, the ultimate source for Yocto Linux kernels are |
| released kernels from ``kernel.org``. In addition to a foundational |
| kernel from ``kernel.org``, the available Yocto Linux kernels contain a |
| mix of important new mainline developments, non-mainline developments |
| (when no alternative exists), Board Support Package (BSP) developments, |
| and custom features. These additions result in a commercially released |
| Yocto Project Linux kernel that caters to specific embedded designer |
| needs for targeted hardware. |
| |
| You can find a web interface to the Yocto Linux kernels in the |
| :ref:`overview-manual/overview-manual-development-environment:yocto project source repositories` |
| at :yocto_git:`/`. If you look at the interface, you will see to |
| the left a grouping of Git repositories titled "Yocto Linux Kernel". |
| Within this group, you will find several Linux Yocto kernels developed |
| and included with Yocto Project releases: |
| |
| - *linux-yocto-4.1:* The stable Yocto Project kernel to use with |
| the Yocto Project Release 2.0. This kernel is based on the Linux 4.1 |
| released kernel. |
| |
| - *linux-yocto-4.4:* The stable Yocto Project kernel to use with |
| the Yocto Project Release 2.1. This kernel is based on the Linux 4.4 |
| released kernel. |
| |
| - *linux-yocto-4.6:* A temporary kernel that is not tied to any |
| Yocto Project release. |
| |
| - *linux-yocto-4.8:* The stable yocto Project kernel to use with |
| the Yocto Project Release 2.2. |
| |
| - *linux-yocto-4.9:* The stable Yocto Project kernel to use with |
| the Yocto Project Release 2.3. This kernel is based on the Linux 4.9 |
| released kernel. |
| |
| - *linux-yocto-4.10:* The default stable Yocto Project kernel to |
| use with the Yocto Project Release 2.3. This kernel is based on the |
| Linux 4.10 released kernel. |
| |
| - *linux-yocto-4.12:* The default stable Yocto Project kernel to |
| use with the Yocto Project Release 2.4. This kernel is based on the |
| Linux 4.12 released kernel. |
| |
| - *yocto-kernel-cache:* The ``linux-yocto-cache`` contains patches |
| and configurations for the linux-yocto kernel tree. This repository |
| is useful when working on the linux-yocto kernel. For more |
| information on this "Advanced Kernel Metadata", see the |
| ":doc:`kernel-dev-advanced`" Chapter. |
| |
| - *linux-yocto-dev:* A development kernel based on the latest |
| upstream release candidate available. |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| Long Term Support Initiative (LTSI) for Yocto Linux kernels is as |
| follows: |
| |
| - For Yocto Project releases 1.7, 1.8, and 2.0, the LTSI kernel is |
| ``linux-yocto-3.14``. |
| |
| - For Yocto Project releases 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3, the LTSI kernel is |
| ``linux-yocto-4.1``. |
| |
| - For Yocto Project release 2.4, the LTSI kernel is |
| ``linux-yocto-4.9`` |
| |
| - ``linux-yocto-4.4`` is an LTS kernel. |
| |
| Once a Yocto Linux kernel is officially released, the Yocto Project team |
| goes into their next development cycle, or upward revision (uprev) |
| cycle, while still continuing maintenance on the released kernel. It is |
| important to note that the most sustainable and stable way to include |
| feature development upstream is through a kernel uprev process. |
| Back-porting hundreds of individual fixes and minor features from |
| various kernel versions is not sustainable and can easily compromise |
| quality. |
| |
| During the uprev cycle, the Yocto Project team uses an ongoing analysis |
| of Linux kernel development, BSP support, and release timing to select |
| the best possible ``kernel.org`` Linux kernel version on which to base |
| subsequent Yocto Linux kernel development. The team continually monitors |
| Linux community kernel development to look for significant features of |
| interest. The team does consider back-porting large features if they |
| have a significant advantage. User or community demand can also trigger |
| a back-port or creation of new functionality in the Yocto Project |
| baseline kernel during the uprev cycle. |
| |
| Generally speaking, every new Linux kernel both adds features and |
| introduces new bugs. These consequences are the basic properties of |
| upstream Linux kernel development and are managed by the Yocto Project |
| team's Yocto Linux kernel development strategy. It is the Yocto Project |
| team's policy to not back-port minor features to the released Yocto |
| Linux kernel. They only consider back-porting significant technological |
| jumps DASH and, that is done after a complete gap analysis. The reason |
| for this policy is that back-porting any small to medium sized change |
| from an evolving Linux kernel can easily create mismatches, |
| incompatibilities and very subtle errors. |
| |
| The policies described in this section result in both a stable and a |
| cutting edge Yocto Linux kernel that mixes forward ports of existing |
| Linux kernel features and significant and critical new functionality. |
| Forward porting Linux kernel functionality into the Yocto Linux kernels |
| available through the Yocto Project can be thought of as a "micro |
| uprev." The many "micro uprevs" produce a Yocto Linux kernel version |
| with a mix of important new mainline, non-mainline, BSP developments and |
| feature integrations. This Yocto Linux kernel gives insight into new |
| features and allows focused amounts of testing to be done on the kernel, |
| which prevents surprises when selecting the next major uprev. The |
| quality of these cutting edge Yocto Linux kernels is evolving and the |
| kernels are used in leading edge feature and BSP development. |
| |
| Yocto Linux Kernel Architecture and Branching Strategies |
| ======================================================== |
| |
| As mentioned earlier, a key goal of the Yocto Project is to present the |
| developer with a kernel that has a clear and continuous history that is |
| visible to the user. The architecture and mechanisms, in particular the |
| branching strategies, used achieve that goal in a manner similar to |
| upstream Linux kernel development in ``kernel.org``. |
| |
| You can think of a Yocto Linux kernel as consisting of a baseline Linux |
| kernel with added features logically structured on top of the baseline. |
| The features are tagged and organized by way of a branching strategy |
| implemented by the Yocto Project team using the Source Code Manager |
| (SCM) Git. |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| - Git is the obvious SCM for meeting the Yocto Linux kernel |
| organizational and structural goals described in this section. Not |
| only is Git the SCM for Linux kernel development in ``kernel.org`` |
| but, Git continues to grow in popularity and supports many |
| different work flows, front-ends and management techniques. |
| |
| - You can find documentation on Git at |
| http://git-scm.com/documentation. You can also get an |
| introduction to Git as it applies to the Yocto Project in the |
| ":ref:`overview-manual/overview-manual-development-environment:git`" section in the Yocto Project |
| Overview and Concepts Manual. The latter reference provides an |
| overview of Git and presents a minimal set of Git commands that |
| allows you to be functional using Git. You can use as much, or as |
| little, of what Git has to offer to accomplish what you need for |
| your project. You do not have to be a "Git Expert" in order to use |
| it with the Yocto Project. |
| |
| Using Git's tagging and branching features, the Yocto Project team |
| creates kernel branches at points where functionality is no longer |
| shared and thus, needs to be isolated. For example, board-specific |
| incompatibilities would require different functionality and would |
| require a branch to separate the features. Likewise, for specific kernel |
| features, the same branching strategy is used. |
| |
| This "tree-like" architecture results in a structure that has features |
| organized to be specific for particular functionality, single kernel |
| types, or a subset of kernel types. Thus, the user has the ability to |
| see the added features and the commits that make up those features. In |
| addition to being able to see added features, the user can also view the |
| history of what made up the baseline Linux kernel. |
| |
| Another consequence of this strategy results in not having to store the |
| same feature twice internally in the tree. Rather, the kernel team |
| stores the unique differences required to apply the feature onto the |
| kernel type in question. |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| The Yocto Project team strives to place features in the tree such |
| that features can be shared by all boards and kernel types where |
| possible. However, during development cycles or when large features |
| are merged, the team cannot always follow this practice. In those |
| cases, the team uses isolated branches to merge features. |
| |
| BSP-specific code additions are handled in a similar manner to |
| kernel-specific additions. Some BSPs only make sense given certain |
| kernel types. So, for these types, the team creates branches off the end |
| of that kernel type for all of the BSPs that are supported on that |
| kernel type. From the perspective of the tools that create the BSP |
| branch, the BSP is really no different than a feature. Consequently, the |
| same branching strategy applies to BSPs as it does to kernel features. |
| So again, rather than store the BSP twice, the team only stores the |
| unique differences for the BSP across the supported multiple kernels. |
| |
| While this strategy can result in a tree with a significant number of |
| branches, it is important to realize that from the developer's point of |
| view, there is a linear path that travels from the baseline |
| ``kernel.org``, through a select group of features and ends with their |
| BSP-specific commits. In other words, the divisions of the kernel are |
| transparent and are not relevant to the developer on a day-to-day basis. |
| From the developer's perspective, this path is the "master" branch in |
| Git terms. The developer does not need to be aware of the existence of |
| any other branches at all. Of course, value exists in the having these |
| branches in the tree, should a person decide to explore them. For |
| example, a comparison between two BSPs at either the commit level or at |
| the line-by-line code ``diff`` level is now a trivial operation. |
| |
| The following illustration shows the conceptual Yocto Linux kernel. |
| |
| .. image:: figures/kernel-architecture-overview.png |
| :align: center |
| |
| In the illustration, the "Kernel.org Branch Point" marks the specific |
| spot (or Linux kernel release) from which the Yocto Linux kernel is |
| created. From this point forward in the tree, features and differences |
| are organized and tagged. |
| |
| The "Yocto Project Baseline Kernel" contains functionality that is |
| common to every kernel type and BSP that is organized further along in |
| the tree. Placing these common features in the tree this way means |
| features do not have to be duplicated along individual branches of the |
| tree structure. |
| |
| From the "Yocto Project Baseline Kernel", branch points represent |
| specific functionality for individual Board Support Packages (BSPs) as |
| well as real-time kernels. The illustration represents this through |
| three BSP-specific branches and a real-time kernel branch. Each branch |
| represents some unique functionality for the BSP or for a real-time |
| Yocto Linux kernel. |
| |
| In this example structure, the "Real-time (rt) Kernel" branch has common |
| features for all real-time Yocto Linux kernels and contains more |
| branches for individual BSP-specific real-time kernels. The illustration |
| shows three branches as an example. Each branch points the way to |
| specific, unique features for a respective real-time kernel as they |
| apply to a given BSP. |
| |
| The resulting tree structure presents a clear path of markers (or |
| branches) to the developer that, for all practical purposes, is the |
| Yocto Linux kernel needed for any given set of requirements. |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| Keep in mind the figure does not take into account all the supported |
| Yocto Linux kernels, but rather shows a single generic kernel just |
| for conceptual purposes. Also keep in mind that this structure |
| represents the Yocto Project |
| Source Repositories |
| that are either pulled from during the build or established on the |
| host development system prior to the build by either cloning a |
| particular kernel's Git repository or by downloading and unpacking a |
| tarball. |
| |
| Working with the kernel as a structured tree follows recognized |
| community best practices. In particular, the kernel as shipped with the |
| product, should be considered an "upstream source" and viewed as a |
| series of historical and documented modifications (commits). These |
| modifications represent the development and stabilization done by the |
| Yocto Project kernel development team. |
| |
| Because commits only change at significant release points in the product |
| life cycle, developers can work on a branch created from the last |
| relevant commit in the shipped Yocto Project Linux kernel. As mentioned |
| previously, the structure is transparent to the developer because the |
| kernel tree is left in this state after cloning and building the kernel. |
| |
| Kernel Build File Hierarchy |
| =========================== |
| |
| Upstream storage of all the available kernel source code is one thing, |
| while representing and using the code on your host development system is |
| another. Conceptually, you can think of the kernel source repositories |
| as all the source files necessary for all the supported Yocto Linux |
| kernels. As a developer, you are just interested in the source files for |
| the kernel on which you are working. And, furthermore, you need them |
| available on your host system. |
| |
| Kernel source code is available on your host system several different |
| ways: |
| |
| - *Files Accessed While using devtool:* ``devtool``, which is |
| available with the Yocto Project, is the preferred method by which to |
| modify the kernel. See the ":ref:`kernel-dev/kernel-dev-intro:kernel modification workflow`" section. |
| |
| - *Cloned Repository:* If you are working in the kernel all the time, |
| you probably would want to set up your own local Git repository of |
| the Yocto Linux kernel tree. For information on how to clone a Yocto |
| Linux kernel Git repository, see the |
| ":ref:`kernel-dev/kernel-dev-common:preparing the build host to work on the kernel`" |
| section. |
| |
| - *Temporary Source Files from a Build:* If you just need to make some |
| patches to the kernel using a traditional BitBake workflow (i.e. not |
| using the ``devtool``), you can access temporary kernel source files |
| that were extracted and used during a kernel build. |
| |
| The temporary kernel source files resulting from a build using BitBake |
| have a particular hierarchy. When you build the kernel on your |
| development system, all files needed for the build are taken from the |
| source repositories pointed to by the |
| :term:`SRC_URI` variable and gathered |
| in a temporary work area where they are subsequently used to create the |
| unique kernel. Thus, in a sense, the process constructs a local source |
| tree specific to your kernel from which to generate the new kernel |
| image. |
| |
| The following figure shows the temporary file structure created on your |
| host system when you build the kernel using Bitbake. This |
| :term:`Build Directory` contains all the |
| source files used during the build. |
| |
| .. image:: figures/kernel-overview-2-generic.png |
| :align: center |
| |
| Again, for additional information on the Yocto Project kernel's |
| architecture and its branching strategy, see the |
| ":ref:`kernel-dev/kernel-dev-concepts-appx:yocto linux kernel architecture and branching strategies`" |
| section. You can also reference the |
| ":ref:`kernel-dev/kernel-dev-common:using \`\`devtool\`\` to patch the kernel`" |
| and |
| ":ref:`kernel-dev/kernel-dev-common:using traditional kernel development to patch the kernel`" |
| sections for detailed example that modifies the kernel. |
| |
| Determining Hardware and Non-Hardware Features for the Kernel Configuration Audit Phase |
| ======================================================================================= |
| |
| This section describes part of the kernel configuration audit phase that |
| most developers can ignore. For general information on kernel |
| configuration including ``menuconfig``, ``defconfig`` files, and |
| configuration fragments, see the |
| ":ref:`kernel-dev/kernel-dev-common:configuring the kernel`" section. |
| |
| During this part of the audit phase, the contents of the final |
| ``.config`` file are compared against the fragments specified by the |
| system. These fragments can be system fragments, distro fragments, or |
| user-specified configuration elements. Regardless of their origin, the |
| OpenEmbedded build system warns the user if a specific option is not |
| included in the final kernel configuration. |
| |
| By default, in order to not overwhelm the user with configuration |
| warnings, the system only reports missing "hardware" options as they |
| could result in a boot failure or indicate that important hardware is |
| not available. |
| |
| To determine whether or not a given option is "hardware" or |
| "non-hardware", the kernel Metadata in ``yocto-kernel-cache`` contains |
| files that classify individual or groups of options as either hardware |
| or non-hardware. To better show this, consider a situation where the |
| ``yocto-kernel-cache`` contains the following files: |
| :: |
| |
| yocto-kernel-cache/features/drm-psb/hardware.cfg |
| yocto-kernel-cache/features/kgdb/hardware.cfg |
| yocto-kernel-cache/ktypes/base/hardware.cfg |
| yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/mti-malta32/hardware.cfg |
| yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/qemu-ppc32/hardware.cfg |
| yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/qemuarma9/hardware.cfg |
| yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/mti-malta64/hardware.cfg |
| yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/arm-versatile-926ejs/hardware.cfg |
| yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/common-pc/hardware.cfg |
| yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/common-pc-64/hardware.cfg |
| yocto-kernel-cache/features/rfkill/non-hardware.cfg |
| yocto-kernel-cache/ktypes/base/non-hardware.cfg |
| yocto-kernel-cache/features/aufs/non-hardware.kcf |
| yocto-kernel-cache/features/ocf/non-hardware.kcf |
| yocto-kernel-cache/ktypes/base/non-hardware.kcf |
| yocto-kernel-cache/ktypes/base/hardware.kcf |
| yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/qemu-ppc32/hardware.kcf |
| |
| The following list |
| provides explanations for the various files: |
| |
| - ``hardware.kcf``: Specifies a list of kernel Kconfig files that |
| contain hardware options only. |
| |
| - ``non-hardware.kcf``: Specifies a list of kernel Kconfig files that |
| contain non-hardware options only. |
| |
| - ``hardware.cfg``: Specifies a list of kernel ``CONFIG_`` options that |
| are hardware, regardless of whether or not they are within a Kconfig |
| file specified by a hardware or non-hardware Kconfig file (i.e. |
| ``hardware.kcf`` or ``non-hardware.kcf``). |
| |
| - ``non-hardware.cfg``: Specifies a list of kernel ``CONFIG_`` options |
| that are not hardware, regardless of whether or not they are within a |
| Kconfig file specified by a hardware or non-hardware Kconfig file |
| (i.e. ``hardware.kcf`` or ``non-hardware.kcf``). |
| |
| Here is a specific example using the |
| ``kernel-cache/bsp/mti-malta32/hardware.cfg``: |
| :: |
| |
| CONFIG_SERIAL_8250 |
| CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE |
| CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_NR_UARTS |
| CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_PCI |
| CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE |
| CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE_CONSOLE |
| CONFIG_VGA_ARB |
| |
| The kernel configuration audit automatically detects |
| these files (hence the names must be exactly the ones discussed here), |
| and uses them as inputs when generating warnings about the final |
| ``.config`` file. |
| |
| A user-specified kernel Metadata repository, or recipe space feature, |
| can use these same files to classify options that are found within its |
| ``.cfg`` files as hardware or non-hardware, to prevent the OpenEmbedded |
| build system from producing an error or warning when an option is not in |
| the final ``.config`` file. |