Andrew Geissler | 517393d | 2023-01-13 08:55:19 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | .. SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-2.0-UK |
| 2 | |
| 3 | Working with Packages |
| 4 | ********************* |
| 5 | |
| 6 | This section describes a few tasks that involve packages: |
| 7 | |
| 8 | - :ref:`dev-manual/packages:excluding packages from an image` |
| 9 | |
| 10 | - :ref:`dev-manual/packages:incrementing a package version` |
| 11 | |
| 12 | - :ref:`dev-manual/packages:handling optional module packaging` |
| 13 | |
| 14 | - :ref:`dev-manual/packages:using runtime package management` |
| 15 | |
| 16 | - :ref:`dev-manual/packages:generating and using signed packages` |
| 17 | |
| 18 | - :ref:`Setting up and running package test |
| 19 | (ptest) <dev-manual/packages:testing packages with ptest>` |
| 20 | |
| 21 | - :ref:`dev-manual/packages:creating node package manager (npm) packages` |
| 22 | |
| 23 | - :ref:`dev-manual/packages:adding custom metadata to packages` |
| 24 | |
| 25 | Excluding Packages from an Image |
| 26 | ================================ |
| 27 | |
| 28 | You might find it necessary to prevent specific packages from being |
| 29 | installed into an image. If so, you can use several variables to direct |
| 30 | the build system to essentially ignore installing recommended packages |
| 31 | or to not install a package at all. |
| 32 | |
| 33 | The following list introduces variables you can use to prevent packages |
| 34 | from being installed into your image. Each of these variables only works |
| 35 | with IPK and RPM package types, not for Debian packages. |
| 36 | Also, you can use these variables from your ``local.conf`` file |
| 37 | or attach them to a specific image recipe by using a recipe name |
| 38 | override. For more detail on the variables, see the descriptions in the |
| 39 | Yocto Project Reference Manual's glossary chapter. |
| 40 | |
| 41 | - :term:`BAD_RECOMMENDATIONS`: |
| 42 | Use this variable to specify "recommended-only" packages that you do |
| 43 | not want installed. |
| 44 | |
| 45 | - :term:`NO_RECOMMENDATIONS`: |
| 46 | Use this variable to prevent all "recommended-only" packages from |
| 47 | being installed. |
| 48 | |
| 49 | - :term:`PACKAGE_EXCLUDE`: |
| 50 | Use this variable to prevent specific packages from being installed |
| 51 | regardless of whether they are "recommended-only" or not. You need to |
| 52 | realize that the build process could fail with an error when you |
| 53 | prevent the installation of a package whose presence is required by |
| 54 | an installed package. |
| 55 | |
| 56 | Incrementing a Package Version |
| 57 | ============================== |
| 58 | |
| 59 | This section provides some background on how binary package versioning |
| 60 | is accomplished and presents some of the services, variables, and |
| 61 | terminology involved. |
| 62 | |
| 63 | In order to understand binary package versioning, you need to consider |
| 64 | the following: |
| 65 | |
| 66 | - Binary Package: The binary package that is eventually built and |
| 67 | installed into an image. |
| 68 | |
| 69 | - Binary Package Version: The binary package version is composed of two |
| 70 | components --- a version and a revision. |
| 71 | |
| 72 | .. note:: |
| 73 | |
| 74 | Technically, a third component, the "epoch" (i.e. :term:`PE`) is involved |
| 75 | but this discussion for the most part ignores :term:`PE`. |
| 76 | |
| 77 | The version and revision are taken from the |
| 78 | :term:`PV` and |
| 79 | :term:`PR` variables, respectively. |
| 80 | |
| 81 | - :term:`PV`: The recipe version. :term:`PV` represents the version of the |
| 82 | software being packaged. Do not confuse :term:`PV` with the binary |
| 83 | package version. |
| 84 | |
| 85 | - :term:`PR`: The recipe revision. |
| 86 | |
| 87 | - :term:`SRCPV`: The OpenEmbedded |
| 88 | build system uses this string to help define the value of :term:`PV` when |
| 89 | the source code revision needs to be included in it. |
| 90 | |
| 91 | - :yocto_wiki:`PR Service </PR_Service>`: A |
| 92 | network-based service that helps automate keeping package feeds |
| 93 | compatible with existing package manager applications such as RPM, |
| 94 | APT, and OPKG. |
| 95 | |
| 96 | Whenever the binary package content changes, the binary package version |
| 97 | must change. Changing the binary package version is accomplished by |
| 98 | changing or "bumping" the :term:`PR` and/or :term:`PV` values. Increasing these |
| 99 | values occurs one of two ways: |
| 100 | |
| 101 | - Automatically using a Package Revision Service (PR Service). |
| 102 | |
| 103 | - Manually incrementing the :term:`PR` and/or :term:`PV` variables. |
| 104 | |
| 105 | Given a primary challenge of any build system and its users is how to |
| 106 | maintain a package feed that is compatible with existing package manager |
| 107 | applications such as RPM, APT, and OPKG, using an automated system is |
| 108 | much preferred over a manual system. In either system, the main |
| 109 | requirement is that binary package version numbering increases in a |
| 110 | linear fashion and that there is a number of version components that |
| 111 | support that linear progression. For information on how to ensure |
| 112 | package revisioning remains linear, see the |
| 113 | ":ref:`dev-manual/packages:automatically incrementing a package version number`" |
| 114 | section. |
| 115 | |
| 116 | The following three sections provide related information on the PR |
| 117 | Service, the manual method for "bumping" :term:`PR` and/or :term:`PV`, and on |
| 118 | how to ensure binary package revisioning remains linear. |
| 119 | |
| 120 | Working With a PR Service |
| 121 | ------------------------- |
| 122 | |
| 123 | As mentioned, attempting to maintain revision numbers in the |
| 124 | :term:`Metadata` is error prone, inaccurate, |
| 125 | and causes problems for people submitting recipes. Conversely, the PR |
| 126 | Service automatically generates increasing numbers, particularly the |
| 127 | revision field, which removes the human element. |
| 128 | |
| 129 | .. note:: |
| 130 | |
| 131 | For additional information on using a PR Service, you can see the |
| 132 | :yocto_wiki:`PR Service </PR_Service>` wiki page. |
| 133 | |
| 134 | The Yocto Project uses variables in order of decreasing priority to |
| 135 | facilitate revision numbering (i.e. |
| 136 | :term:`PE`, |
| 137 | :term:`PV`, and |
| 138 | :term:`PR` for epoch, version, and |
| 139 | revision, respectively). The values are highly dependent on the policies |
| 140 | and procedures of a given distribution and package feed. |
| 141 | |
| 142 | Because the OpenEmbedded build system uses |
| 143 | ":ref:`signatures <overview-manual/concepts:checksums (signatures)>`", which are |
| 144 | unique to a given build, the build system knows when to rebuild |
| 145 | packages. All the inputs into a given task are represented by a |
| 146 | signature, which can trigger a rebuild when different. Thus, the build |
| 147 | system itself does not rely on the :term:`PR`, :term:`PV`, and :term:`PE` numbers to |
| 148 | trigger a rebuild. The signatures, however, can be used to generate |
| 149 | these values. |
| 150 | |
| 151 | The PR Service works with both ``OEBasic`` and ``OEBasicHash`` |
| 152 | generators. The value of :term:`PR` bumps when the checksum changes and the |
| 153 | different generator mechanisms change signatures under different |
| 154 | circumstances. |
| 155 | |
| 156 | As implemented, the build system includes values from the PR Service |
| 157 | into the :term:`PR` field as an addition using the form "``.x``" so ``r0`` |
| 158 | becomes ``r0.1``, ``r0.2`` and so forth. This scheme allows existing |
| 159 | :term:`PR` values to be used for whatever reasons, which include manual |
| 160 | :term:`PR` bumps, should it be necessary. |
| 161 | |
| 162 | By default, the PR Service is not enabled or running. Thus, the packages |
| 163 | generated are just "self consistent". The build system adds and removes |
| 164 | packages and there are no guarantees about upgrade paths but images will |
| 165 | be consistent and correct with the latest changes. |
| 166 | |
| 167 | The simplest form for a PR Service is for a single host development system |
| 168 | that builds the package feed (building system). For this scenario, you can |
| 169 | enable a local PR Service by setting :term:`PRSERV_HOST` in your |
| 170 | ``local.conf`` file in the :term:`Build Directory`:: |
| 171 | |
| 172 | PRSERV_HOST = "localhost:0" |
| 173 | |
| 174 | Once the service is started, packages will automatically |
| 175 | get increasing :term:`PR` values and BitBake takes care of starting and |
| 176 | stopping the server. |
| 177 | |
| 178 | If you have a more complex setup where multiple host development systems |
| 179 | work against a common, shared package feed, you have a single PR Service |
| 180 | running and it is connected to each building system. For this scenario, |
| 181 | you need to start the PR Service using the ``bitbake-prserv`` command:: |
| 182 | |
| 183 | bitbake-prserv --host ip --port port --start |
| 184 | |
| 185 | In addition to |
| 186 | hand-starting the service, you need to update the ``local.conf`` file of |
| 187 | each building system as described earlier so each system points to the |
| 188 | server and port. |
| 189 | |
| 190 | It is also recommended you use build history, which adds some sanity |
| 191 | checks to binary package versions, in conjunction with the server that |
| 192 | is running the PR Service. To enable build history, add the following to |
| 193 | each building system's ``local.conf`` file:: |
| 194 | |
| 195 | # It is recommended to activate "buildhistory" for testing the PR service |
| 196 | INHERIT += "buildhistory" |
| 197 | BUILDHISTORY_COMMIT = "1" |
| 198 | |
| 199 | For information on build |
| 200 | history, see the |
| 201 | ":ref:`dev-manual/build-quality:maintaining build output quality`" section. |
| 202 | |
| 203 | .. note:: |
| 204 | |
| 205 | The OpenEmbedded build system does not maintain :term:`PR` information as |
| 206 | part of the shared state (sstate) packages. If you maintain an sstate |
| 207 | feed, it's expected that either all your building systems that |
| 208 | contribute to the sstate feed use a shared PR Service, or you do not |
| 209 | run a PR Service on any of your building systems. Having some systems |
| 210 | use a PR Service while others do not leads to obvious problems. |
| 211 | |
| 212 | For more information on shared state, see the |
| 213 | ":ref:`overview-manual/concepts:shared state cache`" |
| 214 | section in the Yocto Project Overview and Concepts Manual. |
| 215 | |
| 216 | Manually Bumping PR |
| 217 | ------------------- |
| 218 | |
| 219 | The alternative to setting up a PR Service is to manually "bump" the |
| 220 | :term:`PR` variable. |
| 221 | |
| 222 | If a committed change results in changing the package output, then the |
| 223 | value of the :term:`PR` variable needs to be increased (or "bumped") as part of |
| 224 | that commit. For new recipes you should add the :term:`PR` variable and set |
| 225 | its initial value equal to "r0", which is the default. Even though the |
| 226 | default value is "r0", the practice of adding it to a new recipe makes |
| 227 | it harder to forget to bump the variable when you make changes to the |
| 228 | recipe in future. |
| 229 | |
Andrew Geissler | 517393d | 2023-01-13 08:55:19 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 230 | Usually, version increases occur only to binary packages. However, if |
| 231 | for some reason :term:`PV` changes but does not increase, you can increase |
| 232 | the :term:`PE` variable (Package Epoch). The :term:`PE` variable defaults to |
| 233 | "0". |
| 234 | |
| 235 | Binary package version numbering strives to follow the `Debian Version |
| 236 | Field Policy |
| 237 | Guidelines <https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html>`__. |
| 238 | These guidelines define how versions are compared and what "increasing" |
| 239 | a version means. |
| 240 | |
| 241 | Automatically Incrementing a Package Version Number |
| 242 | --------------------------------------------------- |
| 243 | |
| 244 | When fetching a repository, BitBake uses the |
| 245 | :term:`SRCREV` variable to determine |
| 246 | the specific source code revision from which to build. You set the |
| 247 | :term:`SRCREV` variable to |
| 248 | :term:`AUTOREV` to cause the |
| 249 | OpenEmbedded build system to automatically use the latest revision of |
| 250 | the software:: |
| 251 | |
| 252 | SRCREV = "${AUTOREV}" |
| 253 | |
| 254 | Furthermore, you need to reference :term:`SRCPV` in :term:`PV` in order to |
| 255 | automatically update the version whenever the revision of the source |
| 256 | code changes. Here is an example:: |
| 257 | |
| 258 | PV = "1.0+git${SRCPV}" |
| 259 | |
| 260 | The OpenEmbedded build system substitutes :term:`SRCPV` with the following: |
| 261 | |
| 262 | .. code-block:: none |
| 263 | |
| 264 | AUTOINC+source_code_revision |
| 265 | |
| 266 | The build system replaces the ``AUTOINC`` |
| 267 | with a number. The number used depends on the state of the PR Service: |
| 268 | |
| 269 | - If PR Service is enabled, the build system increments the number, |
| 270 | which is similar to the behavior of |
| 271 | :term:`PR`. This behavior results in |
| 272 | linearly increasing package versions, which is desirable. Here is an |
| 273 | example: |
| 274 | |
| 275 | .. code-block:: none |
| 276 | |
| 277 | hello-world-git_0.0+git0+b6558dd387-r0.0_armv7a-neon.ipk |
| 278 | hello-world-git_0.0+git1+dd2f5c3565-r0.0_armv7a-neon.ipk |
| 279 | |
| 280 | - If PR Service is not enabled, the build system replaces the |
| 281 | ``AUTOINC`` placeholder with zero (i.e. "0"). This results in |
| 282 | changing the package version since the source revision is included. |
| 283 | However, package versions are not increased linearly. Here is an |
| 284 | example: |
| 285 | |
| 286 | .. code-block:: none |
| 287 | |
| 288 | hello-world-git_0.0+git0+b6558dd387-r0.0_armv7a-neon.ipk |
| 289 | hello-world-git_0.0+git0+dd2f5c3565-r0.0_armv7a-neon.ipk |
| 290 | |
| 291 | In summary, the OpenEmbedded build system does not track the history of |
| 292 | binary package versions for this purpose. ``AUTOINC``, in this case, is |
| 293 | comparable to :term:`PR`. If PR server is not enabled, ``AUTOINC`` in the |
| 294 | package version is simply replaced by "0". If PR server is enabled, the |
| 295 | build system keeps track of the package versions and bumps the number |
| 296 | when the package revision changes. |
| 297 | |
| 298 | Handling Optional Module Packaging |
| 299 | ================================== |
| 300 | |
| 301 | Many pieces of software split functionality into optional modules (or |
| 302 | plugins) and the plugins that are built might depend on configuration |
| 303 | options. To avoid having to duplicate the logic that determines what |
| 304 | modules are available in your recipe or to avoid having to package each |
| 305 | module by hand, the OpenEmbedded build system provides functionality to |
| 306 | handle module packaging dynamically. |
| 307 | |
| 308 | To handle optional module packaging, you need to do two things: |
| 309 | |
| 310 | - Ensure the module packaging is actually done. |
| 311 | |
| 312 | - Ensure that any dependencies on optional modules from other recipes |
| 313 | are satisfied by your recipe. |
| 314 | |
| 315 | Making Sure the Packaging is Done |
| 316 | --------------------------------- |
| 317 | |
| 318 | To ensure the module packaging actually gets done, you use the |
| 319 | ``do_split_packages`` function within the ``populate_packages`` Python |
| 320 | function in your recipe. The ``do_split_packages`` function searches for |
| 321 | a pattern of files or directories under a specified path and creates a |
| 322 | package for each one it finds by appending to the |
| 323 | :term:`PACKAGES` variable and |
| 324 | setting the appropriate values for ``FILES:packagename``, |
| 325 | ``RDEPENDS:packagename``, ``DESCRIPTION:packagename``, and so forth. |
| 326 | Here is an example from the ``lighttpd`` recipe:: |
| 327 | |
| 328 | python populate_packages:prepend () { |
| 329 | lighttpd_libdir = d.expand('${libdir}') |
| 330 | do_split_packages(d, lighttpd_libdir, '^mod_(.*).so$', |
| 331 | 'lighttpd-module-%s', 'Lighttpd module for %s', |
| 332 | extra_depends='') |
| 333 | } |
| 334 | |
| 335 | The previous example specifies a number of things in the call to |
| 336 | ``do_split_packages``. |
| 337 | |
| 338 | - A directory within the files installed by your recipe through |
| 339 | :ref:`ref-tasks-install` in which to search. |
| 340 | |
| 341 | - A regular expression used to match module files in that directory. In |
| 342 | the example, note the parentheses () that mark the part of the |
| 343 | expression from which the module name should be derived. |
| 344 | |
| 345 | - A pattern to use for the package names. |
| 346 | |
| 347 | - A description for each package. |
| 348 | |
| 349 | - An empty string for ``extra_depends``, which disables the default |
| 350 | dependency on the main ``lighttpd`` package. Thus, if a file in |
| 351 | ``${libdir}`` called ``mod_alias.so`` is found, a package called |
| 352 | ``lighttpd-module-alias`` is created for it and the |
| 353 | :term:`DESCRIPTION` is set to |
| 354 | "Lighttpd module for alias". |
| 355 | |
| 356 | Often, packaging modules is as simple as the previous example. However, |
| 357 | there are more advanced options that you can use within |
| 358 | ``do_split_packages`` to modify its behavior. And, if you need to, you |
| 359 | can add more logic by specifying a hook function that is called for each |
| 360 | package. It is also perfectly acceptable to call ``do_split_packages`` |
| 361 | multiple times if you have more than one set of modules to package. |
| 362 | |
| 363 | For more examples that show how to use ``do_split_packages``, see the |
| 364 | ``connman.inc`` file in the ``meta/recipes-connectivity/connman/`` |
| 365 | directory of the ``poky`` :ref:`source repository <overview-manual/development-environment:yocto project source repositories>`. You can |
| 366 | also find examples in ``meta/classes-recipe/kernel.bbclass``. |
| 367 | |
| 368 | Following is a reference that shows ``do_split_packages`` mandatory and |
| 369 | optional arguments:: |
| 370 | |
| 371 | Mandatory arguments |
| 372 | |
| 373 | root |
| 374 | The path in which to search |
| 375 | file_regex |
| 376 | Regular expression to match searched files. |
| 377 | Use parentheses () to mark the part of this |
| 378 | expression that should be used to derive the |
| 379 | module name (to be substituted where %s is |
| 380 | used in other function arguments as noted below) |
| 381 | output_pattern |
| 382 | Pattern to use for the package names. Must |
| 383 | include %s. |
| 384 | description |
| 385 | Description to set for each package. Must |
| 386 | include %s. |
| 387 | |
| 388 | Optional arguments |
| 389 | |
| 390 | postinst |
| 391 | Postinstall script to use for all packages |
| 392 | (as a string) |
| 393 | recursive |
| 394 | True to perform a recursive search --- default |
| 395 | False |
| 396 | hook |
| 397 | A hook function to be called for every match. |
| 398 | The function will be called with the following |
| 399 | arguments (in the order listed): |
| 400 | |
| 401 | f |
| 402 | Full path to the file/directory match |
| 403 | pkg |
| 404 | The package name |
| 405 | file_regex |
| 406 | As above |
| 407 | output_pattern |
| 408 | As above |
| 409 | modulename |
| 410 | The module name derived using file_regex |
| 411 | extra_depends |
| 412 | Extra runtime dependencies (RDEPENDS) to be |
| 413 | set for all packages. The default value of None |
| 414 | causes a dependency on the main package |
| 415 | (${PN}) --- if you do not want this, pass empty |
| 416 | string '' for this parameter. |
| 417 | aux_files_pattern |
| 418 | Extra item(s) to be added to FILES for each |
| 419 | package. Can be a single string item or a list |
| 420 | of strings for multiple items. Must include %s. |
| 421 | postrm |
| 422 | postrm script to use for all packages (as a |
| 423 | string) |
| 424 | allow_dirs |
| 425 | True to allow directories to be matched - |
| 426 | default False |
| 427 | prepend |
| 428 | If True, prepend created packages to PACKAGES |
| 429 | instead of the default False which appends them |
| 430 | match_path |
| 431 | match file_regex on the whole relative path to |
| 432 | the root rather than just the filename |
| 433 | aux_files_pattern_verbatim |
| 434 | Extra item(s) to be added to FILES for each |
| 435 | package, using the actual derived module name |
| 436 | rather than converting it to something legal |
| 437 | for a package name. Can be a single string item |
| 438 | or a list of strings for multiple items. Must |
| 439 | include %s. |
| 440 | allow_links |
| 441 | True to allow symlinks to be matched --- default |
| 442 | False |
| 443 | summary |
| 444 | Summary to set for each package. Must include %s; |
| 445 | defaults to description if not set. |
| 446 | |
| 447 | |
| 448 | |
| 449 | Satisfying Dependencies |
| 450 | ----------------------- |
| 451 | |
| 452 | The second part for handling optional module packaging is to ensure that |
| 453 | any dependencies on optional modules from other recipes are satisfied by |
| 454 | your recipe. You can be sure these dependencies are satisfied by using |
| 455 | the :term:`PACKAGES_DYNAMIC` |
| 456 | variable. Here is an example that continues with the ``lighttpd`` recipe |
| 457 | shown earlier:: |
| 458 | |
| 459 | PACKAGES_DYNAMIC = "lighttpd-module-.*" |
| 460 | |
| 461 | The name |
| 462 | specified in the regular expression can of course be anything. In this |
| 463 | example, it is ``lighttpd-module-`` and is specified as the prefix to |
| 464 | ensure that any :term:`RDEPENDS` and |
| 465 | :term:`RRECOMMENDS` on a package |
| 466 | name starting with the prefix are satisfied during build time. If you |
| 467 | are using ``do_split_packages`` as described in the previous section, |
| 468 | the value you put in :term:`PACKAGES_DYNAMIC` should correspond to the name |
| 469 | pattern specified in the call to ``do_split_packages``. |
| 470 | |
| 471 | Using Runtime Package Management |
| 472 | ================================ |
| 473 | |
| 474 | During a build, BitBake always transforms a recipe into one or more |
| 475 | packages. For example, BitBake takes the ``bash`` recipe and produces a |
| 476 | number of packages (e.g. ``bash``, ``bash-bashbug``, |
| 477 | ``bash-completion``, ``bash-completion-dbg``, ``bash-completion-dev``, |
| 478 | ``bash-completion-extra``, ``bash-dbg``, and so forth). Not all |
| 479 | generated packages are included in an image. |
| 480 | |
| 481 | In several situations, you might need to update, add, remove, or query |
| 482 | the packages on a target device at runtime (i.e. without having to |
| 483 | generate a new image). Examples of such situations include: |
| 484 | |
| 485 | - You want to provide in-the-field updates to deployed devices (e.g. |
| 486 | security updates). |
| 487 | |
| 488 | - You want to have a fast turn-around development cycle for one or more |
| 489 | applications that run on your device. |
| 490 | |
| 491 | - You want to temporarily install the "debug" packages of various |
| 492 | applications on your device so that debugging can be greatly improved |
| 493 | by allowing access to symbols and source debugging. |
| 494 | |
| 495 | - You want to deploy a more minimal package selection of your device |
| 496 | but allow in-the-field updates to add a larger selection for |
| 497 | customization. |
| 498 | |
| 499 | In all these situations, you have something similar to a more |
| 500 | traditional Linux distribution in that in-field devices are able to |
| 501 | receive pre-compiled packages from a server for installation or update. |
| 502 | Being able to install these packages on a running, in-field device is |
| 503 | what is termed "runtime package management". |
| 504 | |
| 505 | In order to use runtime package management, you need a host or server |
| 506 | machine that serves up the pre-compiled packages plus the required |
| 507 | metadata. You also need package manipulation tools on the target. The |
| 508 | build machine is a likely candidate to act as the server. However, that |
| 509 | machine does not necessarily have to be the package server. The build |
| 510 | machine could push its artifacts to another machine that acts as the |
| 511 | server (e.g. Internet-facing). In fact, doing so is advantageous for a |
| 512 | production environment as getting the packages away from the development |
| 513 | system's :term:`Build Directory` prevents accidental overwrites. |
| 514 | |
| 515 | A simple build that targets just one device produces more than one |
| 516 | package database. In other words, the packages produced by a build are |
| 517 | separated out into a couple of different package groupings based on |
| 518 | criteria such as the target's CPU architecture, the target board, or the |
| 519 | C library used on the target. For example, a build targeting the |
| 520 | ``qemux86`` device produces the following three package databases: |
| 521 | ``noarch``, ``i586``, and ``qemux86``. If you wanted your ``qemux86`` |
| 522 | device to be aware of all the packages that were available to it, you |
| 523 | would need to point it to each of these databases individually. In a |
| 524 | similar way, a traditional Linux distribution usually is configured to |
| 525 | be aware of a number of software repositories from which it retrieves |
| 526 | packages. |
| 527 | |
| 528 | Using runtime package management is completely optional and not required |
| 529 | for a successful build or deployment in any way. But if you want to make |
| 530 | use of runtime package management, you need to do a couple things above |
| 531 | and beyond the basics. The remainder of this section describes what you |
| 532 | need to do. |
| 533 | |
| 534 | Build Considerations |
| 535 | -------------------- |
| 536 | |
| 537 | This section describes build considerations of which you need to be |
| 538 | aware in order to provide support for runtime package management. |
| 539 | |
| 540 | When BitBake generates packages, it needs to know what format or formats |
| 541 | to use. In your configuration, you use the |
| 542 | :term:`PACKAGE_CLASSES` |
| 543 | variable to specify the format: |
| 544 | |
| 545 | #. Open the ``local.conf`` file inside your :term:`Build Directory` (e.g. |
| 546 | ``poky/build/conf/local.conf``). |
| 547 | |
| 548 | #. Select the desired package format as follows:: |
| 549 | |
| 550 | PACKAGE_CLASSES ?= "package_packageformat" |
| 551 | |
| 552 | where packageformat can be "ipk", "rpm", |
| 553 | "deb", or "tar" which are the supported package formats. |
| 554 | |
| 555 | .. note:: |
| 556 | |
| 557 | Because the Yocto Project supports four different package formats, |
| 558 | you can set the variable with more than one argument. However, the |
| 559 | OpenEmbedded build system only uses the first argument when |
| 560 | creating an image or Software Development Kit (SDK). |
| 561 | |
| 562 | If you would like your image to start off with a basic package database |
| 563 | containing the packages in your current build as well as to have the |
| 564 | relevant tools available on the target for runtime package management, |
| 565 | you can include "package-management" in the |
| 566 | :term:`IMAGE_FEATURES` |
| 567 | variable. Including "package-management" in this configuration variable |
| 568 | ensures that when the image is assembled for your target, the image |
| 569 | includes the currently-known package databases as well as the |
| 570 | target-specific tools required for runtime package management to be |
| 571 | performed on the target. However, this is not strictly necessary. You |
| 572 | could start your image off without any databases but only include the |
| 573 | required on-target package tool(s). As an example, you could include |
| 574 | "opkg" in your |
| 575 | :term:`IMAGE_INSTALL` variable |
| 576 | if you are using the IPK package format. You can then initialize your |
| 577 | target's package database(s) later once your image is up and running. |
| 578 | |
| 579 | Whenever you perform any sort of build step that can potentially |
| 580 | generate a package or modify existing package, it is always a good idea |
| 581 | to re-generate the package index after the build by using the following |
| 582 | command:: |
| 583 | |
| 584 | $ bitbake package-index |
| 585 | |
| 586 | It might be tempting to build the |
| 587 | package and the package index at the same time with a command such as |
| 588 | the following:: |
| 589 | |
| 590 | $ bitbake some-package package-index |
| 591 | |
| 592 | Do not do this as |
| 593 | BitBake does not schedule the package index for after the completion of |
| 594 | the package you are building. Consequently, you cannot be sure of the |
| 595 | package index including information for the package you just built. |
| 596 | Thus, be sure to run the package update step separately after building |
| 597 | any packages. |
| 598 | |
| 599 | You can use the |
| 600 | :term:`PACKAGE_FEED_ARCHS`, |
| 601 | :term:`PACKAGE_FEED_BASE_PATHS`, |
| 602 | and |
| 603 | :term:`PACKAGE_FEED_URIS` |
| 604 | variables to pre-configure target images to use a package feed. If you |
| 605 | do not define these variables, then manual steps as described in the |
| 606 | subsequent sections are necessary to configure the target. You should |
| 607 | set these variables before building the image in order to produce a |
| 608 | correctly configured image. |
| 609 | |
| 610 | When your build is complete, your packages reside in the |
| 611 | ``${TMPDIR}/deploy/packageformat`` directory. For example, if |
| 612 | ``${``\ :term:`TMPDIR`\ ``}`` is |
| 613 | ``tmp`` and your selected package type is RPM, then your RPM packages |
| 614 | are available in ``tmp/deploy/rpm``. |
| 615 | |
| 616 | Host or Server Machine Setup |
| 617 | ---------------------------- |
| 618 | |
| 619 | Although other protocols are possible, a server using HTTP typically |
| 620 | serves packages. If you want to use HTTP, then set up and configure a |
| 621 | web server such as Apache 2, lighttpd, or Python web server on the |
| 622 | machine serving the packages. |
| 623 | |
| 624 | To keep things simple, this section describes how to set up a |
| 625 | Python web server to share package feeds from the developer's |
| 626 | machine. Although this server might not be the best for a production |
| 627 | environment, the setup is simple and straight forward. Should you want |
| 628 | to use a different server more suited for production (e.g. Apache 2, |
| 629 | Lighttpd, or Nginx), take the appropriate steps to do so. |
| 630 | |
| 631 | From within the :term:`Build Directory` where you have built an image based on |
| 632 | your packaging choice (i.e. the :term:`PACKAGE_CLASSES` setting), simply start |
| 633 | the server. The following example assumes a :term:`Build Directory` of ``poky/build`` |
| 634 | and a :term:`PACKAGE_CLASSES` setting of ":ref:`ref-classes-package_rpm`":: |
| 635 | |
| 636 | $ cd poky/build/tmp/deploy/rpm |
| 637 | $ python3 -m http.server |
| 638 | |
| 639 | Target Setup |
| 640 | ------------ |
| 641 | |
| 642 | Setting up the target differs depending on the package management |
| 643 | system. This section provides information for RPM, IPK, and DEB. |
| 644 | |
| 645 | Using RPM |
| 646 | ~~~~~~~~~ |
| 647 | |
| 648 | The :wikipedia:`Dandified Packaging <DNF_(software)>` (DNF) performs |
| 649 | runtime package management of RPM packages. In order to use DNF for |
| 650 | runtime package management, you must perform an initial setup on the |
| 651 | target machine for cases where the ``PACKAGE_FEED_*`` variables were not |
| 652 | set as part of the image that is running on the target. This means if |
| 653 | you built your image and did not use these variables as part of the |
| 654 | build and your image is now running on the target, you need to perform |
| 655 | the steps in this section if you want to use runtime package management. |
| 656 | |
| 657 | .. note:: |
| 658 | |
| 659 | For information on the ``PACKAGE_FEED_*`` variables, see |
| 660 | :term:`PACKAGE_FEED_ARCHS`, :term:`PACKAGE_FEED_BASE_PATHS`, and |
| 661 | :term:`PACKAGE_FEED_URIS` in the Yocto Project Reference Manual variables |
| 662 | glossary. |
| 663 | |
| 664 | On the target, you must inform DNF that package databases are available. |
| 665 | You do this by creating a file named |
| 666 | ``/etc/yum.repos.d/oe-packages.repo`` and defining the ``oe-packages``. |
| 667 | |
| 668 | As an example, assume the target is able to use the following package |
| 669 | databases: ``all``, ``i586``, and ``qemux86`` from a server named |
| 670 | ``my.server``. The specifics for setting up the web server are up to |
| 671 | you. The critical requirement is that the URIs in the target repository |
| 672 | configuration point to the correct remote location for the feeds. |
| 673 | |
| 674 | .. note:: |
| 675 | |
| 676 | For development purposes, you can point the web server to the build |
| 677 | system's ``deploy`` directory. However, for production use, it is better to |
| 678 | copy the package directories to a location outside of the build area and use |
| 679 | that location. Doing so avoids situations where the build system |
| 680 | overwrites or changes the ``deploy`` directory. |
| 681 | |
| 682 | When telling DNF where to look for the package databases, you must |
| 683 | declare individual locations per architecture or a single location used |
| 684 | for all architectures. You cannot do both: |
| 685 | |
| 686 | - *Create an Explicit List of Architectures:* Define individual base |
| 687 | URLs to identify where each package database is located: |
| 688 | |
| 689 | .. code-block:: none |
| 690 | |
| 691 | [oe-packages] |
| 692 | baseurl=http://my.server/rpm/i586 http://my.server/rpm/qemux86 http://my.server/rpm/all |
| 693 | |
| 694 | This example |
| 695 | informs DNF about individual package databases for all three |
| 696 | architectures. |
| 697 | |
| 698 | - *Create a Single (Full) Package Index:* Define a single base URL that |
| 699 | identifies where a full package database is located:: |
| 700 | |
| 701 | [oe-packages] |
| 702 | baseurl=http://my.server/rpm |
| 703 | |
| 704 | This example informs DNF about a single |
| 705 | package database that contains all the package index information for |
| 706 | all supported architectures. |
| 707 | |
| 708 | Once you have informed DNF where to find the package databases, you need |
| 709 | to fetch them: |
| 710 | |
| 711 | .. code-block:: none |
| 712 | |
| 713 | # dnf makecache |
| 714 | |
| 715 | DNF is now able to find, install, and |
| 716 | upgrade packages from the specified repository or repositories. |
| 717 | |
| 718 | .. note:: |
| 719 | |
| 720 | See the `DNF documentation <https://dnf.readthedocs.io/en/latest/>`__ for |
| 721 | additional information. |
| 722 | |
| 723 | Using IPK |
| 724 | ~~~~~~~~~ |
| 725 | |
| 726 | The ``opkg`` application performs runtime package management of IPK |
| 727 | packages. You must perform an initial setup for ``opkg`` on the target |
| 728 | machine if the |
| 729 | :term:`PACKAGE_FEED_ARCHS`, |
| 730 | :term:`PACKAGE_FEED_BASE_PATHS`, |
| 731 | and |
| 732 | :term:`PACKAGE_FEED_URIS` |
| 733 | variables have not been set or the target image was built before the |
| 734 | variables were set. |
| 735 | |
| 736 | The ``opkg`` application uses configuration files to find available |
| 737 | package databases. Thus, you need to create a configuration file inside |
| 738 | the ``/etc/opkg/`` directory, which informs ``opkg`` of any repository |
| 739 | you want to use. |
| 740 | |
| 741 | As an example, suppose you are serving packages from a ``ipk/`` |
| 742 | directory containing the ``i586``, ``all``, and ``qemux86`` databases |
| 743 | through an HTTP server named ``my.server``. On the target, create a |
| 744 | configuration file (e.g. ``my_repo.conf``) inside the ``/etc/opkg/`` |
| 745 | directory containing the following: |
| 746 | |
| 747 | .. code-block:: none |
| 748 | |
| 749 | src/gz all http://my.server/ipk/all |
| 750 | src/gz i586 http://my.server/ipk/i586 |
| 751 | src/gz qemux86 http://my.server/ipk/qemux86 |
| 752 | |
| 753 | Next, instruct ``opkg`` to fetch the |
| 754 | repository information: |
| 755 | |
| 756 | .. code-block:: none |
| 757 | |
| 758 | # opkg update |
| 759 | |
| 760 | The ``opkg`` application is now able to find, install, and upgrade packages |
| 761 | from the specified repository. |
| 762 | |
| 763 | Using DEB |
| 764 | ~~~~~~~~~ |
| 765 | |
| 766 | The ``apt`` application performs runtime package management of DEB |
| 767 | packages. This application uses a source list file to find available |
| 768 | package databases. You must perform an initial setup for ``apt`` on the |
| 769 | target machine if the |
| 770 | :term:`PACKAGE_FEED_ARCHS`, |
| 771 | :term:`PACKAGE_FEED_BASE_PATHS`, |
| 772 | and |
| 773 | :term:`PACKAGE_FEED_URIS` |
| 774 | variables have not been set or the target image was built before the |
| 775 | variables were set. |
| 776 | |
| 777 | To inform ``apt`` of the repository you want to use, you might create a |
| 778 | list file (e.g. ``my_repo.list``) inside the |
| 779 | ``/etc/apt/sources.list.d/`` directory. As an example, suppose you are |
| 780 | serving packages from a ``deb/`` directory containing the ``i586``, |
| 781 | ``all``, and ``qemux86`` databases through an HTTP server named |
| 782 | ``my.server``. The list file should contain: |
| 783 | |
| 784 | .. code-block:: none |
| 785 | |
| 786 | deb http://my.server/deb/all ./ |
| 787 | deb http://my.server/deb/i586 ./ |
| 788 | deb http://my.server/deb/qemux86 ./ |
| 789 | |
| 790 | Next, instruct the ``apt`` application |
| 791 | to fetch the repository information: |
| 792 | |
| 793 | .. code-block:: none |
| 794 | |
| 795 | $ sudo apt update |
| 796 | |
| 797 | After this step, |
| 798 | ``apt`` is able to find, install, and upgrade packages from the |
| 799 | specified repository. |
| 800 | |
| 801 | Generating and Using Signed Packages |
| 802 | ==================================== |
| 803 | |
| 804 | In order to add security to RPM packages used during a build, you can |
| 805 | take steps to securely sign them. Once a signature is verified, the |
| 806 | OpenEmbedded build system can use the package in the build. If security |
| 807 | fails for a signed package, the build system stops the build. |
| 808 | |
| 809 | This section describes how to sign RPM packages during a build and how |
| 810 | to use signed package feeds (repositories) when doing a build. |
| 811 | |
| 812 | Signing RPM Packages |
| 813 | -------------------- |
| 814 | |
| 815 | To enable signing RPM packages, you must set up the following |
| 816 | configurations in either your ``local.config`` or ``distro.config`` |
| 817 | file:: |
| 818 | |
| 819 | # Inherit sign_rpm.bbclass to enable signing functionality |
| 820 | INHERIT += " sign_rpm" |
| 821 | # Define the GPG key that will be used for signing. |
| 822 | RPM_GPG_NAME = "key_name" |
| 823 | # Provide passphrase for the key |
| 824 | RPM_GPG_PASSPHRASE = "passphrase" |
| 825 | |
| 826 | .. note:: |
| 827 | |
| 828 | Be sure to supply appropriate values for both `key_name` and |
| 829 | `passphrase`. |
| 830 | |
| 831 | Aside from the ``RPM_GPG_NAME`` and ``RPM_GPG_PASSPHRASE`` variables in |
| 832 | the previous example, two optional variables related to signing are available: |
| 833 | |
| 834 | - *GPG_BIN:* Specifies a ``gpg`` binary/wrapper that is executed |
| 835 | when the package is signed. |
| 836 | |
| 837 | - *GPG_PATH:* Specifies the ``gpg`` home directory used when the |
| 838 | package is signed. |
| 839 | |
| 840 | Processing Package Feeds |
| 841 | ------------------------ |
| 842 | |
| 843 | In addition to being able to sign RPM packages, you can also enable |
| 844 | signed package feeds for IPK and RPM packages. |
| 845 | |
| 846 | The steps you need to take to enable signed package feed use are similar |
| 847 | to the steps used to sign RPM packages. You must define the following in |
| 848 | your ``local.config`` or ``distro.config`` file:: |
| 849 | |
| 850 | INHERIT += "sign_package_feed" |
| 851 | PACKAGE_FEED_GPG_NAME = "key_name" |
| 852 | PACKAGE_FEED_GPG_PASSPHRASE_FILE = "path_to_file_containing_passphrase" |
| 853 | |
| 854 | For signed package feeds, the passphrase must be specified in a separate file, |
| 855 | which is pointed to by the ``PACKAGE_FEED_GPG_PASSPHRASE_FILE`` |
| 856 | variable. Regarding security, keeping a plain text passphrase out of the |
| 857 | configuration is more secure. |
| 858 | |
| 859 | Aside from the ``PACKAGE_FEED_GPG_NAME`` and |
| 860 | ``PACKAGE_FEED_GPG_PASSPHRASE_FILE`` variables, three optional variables |
| 861 | related to signed package feeds are available: |
| 862 | |
| 863 | - *GPG_BIN* Specifies a ``gpg`` binary/wrapper that is executed |
| 864 | when the package is signed. |
| 865 | |
| 866 | - *GPG_PATH:* Specifies the ``gpg`` home directory used when the |
| 867 | package is signed. |
| 868 | |
| 869 | - *PACKAGE_FEED_GPG_SIGNATURE_TYPE:* Specifies the type of ``gpg`` |
| 870 | signature. This variable applies only to RPM and IPK package feeds. |
| 871 | Allowable values for the ``PACKAGE_FEED_GPG_SIGNATURE_TYPE`` are |
| 872 | "ASC", which is the default and specifies ascii armored, and "BIN", |
| 873 | which specifies binary. |
| 874 | |
| 875 | Testing Packages With ptest |
| 876 | =========================== |
| 877 | |
| 878 | A Package Test (ptest) runs tests against packages built by the |
| 879 | OpenEmbedded build system on the target machine. A ptest contains at |
| 880 | least two items: the actual test, and a shell script (``run-ptest``) |
| 881 | that starts the test. The shell script that starts the test must not |
| 882 | contain the actual test --- the script only starts the test. On the other |
| 883 | hand, the test can be anything from a simple shell script that runs a |
| 884 | binary and checks the output to an elaborate system of test binaries and |
| 885 | data files. |
| 886 | |
| 887 | The test generates output in the format used by Automake:: |
| 888 | |
| 889 | result: testname |
| 890 | |
| 891 | where the result can be ``PASS``, ``FAIL``, or ``SKIP``, and |
| 892 | the testname can be any identifying string. |
| 893 | |
| 894 | For a list of Yocto Project recipes that are already enabled with ptest, |
| 895 | see the :yocto_wiki:`Ptest </Ptest>` wiki page. |
| 896 | |
| 897 | .. note:: |
| 898 | |
| 899 | A recipe is "ptest-enabled" if it inherits the :ref:`ref-classes-ptest` |
| 900 | class. |
| 901 | |
| 902 | Adding ptest to Your Build |
| 903 | -------------------------- |
| 904 | |
| 905 | To add package testing to your build, add the :term:`DISTRO_FEATURES` and |
| 906 | :term:`EXTRA_IMAGE_FEATURES` variables to your ``local.conf`` file, which |
| 907 | is found in the :term:`Build Directory`:: |
| 908 | |
| 909 | DISTRO_FEATURES:append = " ptest" |
| 910 | EXTRA_IMAGE_FEATURES += "ptest-pkgs" |
| 911 | |
| 912 | Once your build is complete, the ptest files are installed into the |
| 913 | ``/usr/lib/package/ptest`` directory within the image, where ``package`` |
| 914 | is the name of the package. |
| 915 | |
| 916 | Running ptest |
| 917 | ------------- |
| 918 | |
| 919 | The ``ptest-runner`` package installs a shell script that loops through |
| 920 | all installed ptest test suites and runs them in sequence. Consequently, |
| 921 | you might want to add this package to your image. |
| 922 | |
| 923 | Getting Your Package Ready |
| 924 | -------------------------- |
| 925 | |
| 926 | In order to enable a recipe to run installed ptests on target hardware, |
| 927 | you need to prepare the recipes that build the packages you want to |
| 928 | test. Here is what you have to do for each recipe: |
| 929 | |
| 930 | - *Be sure the recipe inherits the* :ref:`ref-classes-ptest` *class:* |
| 931 | Include the following line in each recipe:: |
| 932 | |
| 933 | inherit ptest |
| 934 | |
| 935 | - *Create run-ptest:* This script starts your test. Locate the |
| 936 | script where you will refer to it using |
| 937 | :term:`SRC_URI`. Here is an |
| 938 | example that starts a test for ``dbus``:: |
| 939 | |
| 940 | #!/bin/sh |
| 941 | cd test |
| 942 | make -k runtest-TESTS |
| 943 | |
| 944 | - *Ensure dependencies are met:* If the test adds build or runtime |
| 945 | dependencies that normally do not exist for the package (such as |
| 946 | requiring "make" to run the test suite), use the |
| 947 | :term:`DEPENDS` and |
| 948 | :term:`RDEPENDS` variables in |
| 949 | your recipe in order for the package to meet the dependencies. Here |
| 950 | is an example where the package has a runtime dependency on "make":: |
| 951 | |
| 952 | RDEPENDS:${PN}-ptest += "make" |
| 953 | |
| 954 | - *Add a function to build the test suite:* Not many packages support |
| 955 | cross-compilation of their test suites. Consequently, you usually |
| 956 | need to add a cross-compilation function to the package. |
| 957 | |
| 958 | Many packages based on Automake compile and run the test suite by |
| 959 | using a single command such as ``make check``. However, the host |
| 960 | ``make check`` builds and runs on the same computer, while |
| 961 | cross-compiling requires that the package is built on the host but |
| 962 | executed for the target architecture (though often, as in the case |
| 963 | for ptest, the execution occurs on the host). The built version of |
| 964 | Automake that ships with the Yocto Project includes a patch that |
| 965 | separates building and execution. Consequently, packages that use the |
| 966 | unaltered, patched version of ``make check`` automatically |
| 967 | cross-compiles. |
| 968 | |
| 969 | Regardless, you still must add a ``do_compile_ptest`` function to |
| 970 | build the test suite. Add a function similar to the following to your |
| 971 | recipe:: |
| 972 | |
| 973 | do_compile_ptest() { |
| 974 | oe_runmake buildtest-TESTS |
| 975 | } |
| 976 | |
| 977 | - *Ensure special configurations are set:* If the package requires |
| 978 | special configurations prior to compiling the test code, you must |
| 979 | insert a ``do_configure_ptest`` function into the recipe. |
| 980 | |
| 981 | - *Install the test suite:* The :ref:`ref-classes-ptest` class |
| 982 | automatically copies the file ``run-ptest`` to the target and then runs make |
| 983 | ``install-ptest`` to run the tests. If this is not enough, you need |
| 984 | to create a ``do_install_ptest`` function and make sure it gets |
| 985 | called after the "make install-ptest" completes. |
| 986 | |
| 987 | Creating Node Package Manager (NPM) Packages |
| 988 | ============================================ |
| 989 | |
Andrew Geissler | fc113ea | 2023-03-31 09:59:46 -0500 | [diff] [blame] | 990 | :wikipedia:`NPM <Npm_(software)>` is a package manager for the JavaScript |
| 991 | programming language. The Yocto Project supports the NPM |
| 992 | :ref:`fetcher <bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manual-fetching:fetchers>`. |
| 993 | You can use this fetcher in combination with |
| 994 | :doc:`devtool </ref-manual/devtool-reference>` to create recipes that produce |
| 995 | NPM packages. |
Andrew Geissler | 517393d | 2023-01-13 08:55:19 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 996 | |
| 997 | There are two workflows that allow you to create NPM packages using |
| 998 | ``devtool``: the NPM registry modules method and the NPM project code |
| 999 | method. |
| 1000 | |
| 1001 | .. note:: |
| 1002 | |
| 1003 | While it is possible to create NPM recipes manually, using |
| 1004 | ``devtool`` is far simpler. |
| 1005 | |
| 1006 | Additionally, some requirements and caveats exist. |
| 1007 | |
| 1008 | Requirements and Caveats |
| 1009 | ------------------------ |
| 1010 | |
| 1011 | You need to be aware of the following before using ``devtool`` to create |
| 1012 | NPM packages: |
| 1013 | |
| 1014 | - Of the two methods that you can use ``devtool`` to create NPM |
| 1015 | packages, the registry approach is slightly simpler. However, you |
| 1016 | might consider the project approach because you do not have to |
| 1017 | publish your module in the `NPM registry <https://docs.npmjs.com/misc/registry>`__, |
| 1018 | which is NPM's public registry. |
| 1019 | |
| 1020 | - Be familiar with |
| 1021 | :doc:`devtool </ref-manual/devtool-reference>`. |
| 1022 | |
| 1023 | - The NPM host tools need the native ``nodejs-npm`` package, which is |
| 1024 | part of the OpenEmbedded environment. You need to get the package by |
| 1025 | cloning the :oe_git:`meta-openembedded </meta-openembedded>` |
| 1026 | repository. Be sure to add the path to your local copy |
| 1027 | to your ``bblayers.conf`` file. |
| 1028 | |
| 1029 | - ``devtool`` cannot detect native libraries in module dependencies. |
| 1030 | Consequently, you must manually add packages to your recipe. |
| 1031 | |
| 1032 | - While deploying NPM packages, ``devtool`` cannot determine which |
| 1033 | dependent packages are missing on the target (e.g. the node runtime |
| 1034 | ``nodejs``). Consequently, you need to find out what files are |
| 1035 | missing and be sure they are on the target. |
| 1036 | |
| 1037 | - Although you might not need NPM to run your node package, it is |
| 1038 | useful to have NPM on your target. The NPM package name is |
| 1039 | ``nodejs-npm``. |
| 1040 | |
| 1041 | Using the Registry Modules Method |
| 1042 | --------------------------------- |
| 1043 | |
| 1044 | This section presents an example that uses the ``cute-files`` module, |
| 1045 | which is a file browser web application. |
| 1046 | |
| 1047 | .. note:: |
| 1048 | |
| 1049 | You must know the ``cute-files`` module version. |
| 1050 | |
| 1051 | The first thing you need to do is use ``devtool`` and the NPM fetcher to |
| 1052 | create the recipe:: |
| 1053 | |
| 1054 | $ devtool add "npm://registry.npmjs.org;package=cute-files;version=1.0.2" |
| 1055 | |
| 1056 | The |
| 1057 | ``devtool add`` command runs ``recipetool create`` and uses the same |
| 1058 | fetch URI to download each dependency and capture license details where |
| 1059 | possible. The result is a generated recipe. |
| 1060 | |
| 1061 | After running for quite a long time, in particular building the |
| 1062 | ``nodejs-native`` package, the command should end as follows:: |
| 1063 | |
| 1064 | INFO: Recipe /home/.../build/workspace/recipes/cute-files/cute-files_1.0.2.bb has been automatically created; further editing may be required to make it fully functional |
| 1065 | |
| 1066 | The recipe file is fairly simple and contains every license that |
| 1067 | ``recipetool`` finds and includes the licenses in the recipe's |
| 1068 | :term:`LIC_FILES_CHKSUM` |
| 1069 | variables. You need to examine the variables and look for those with |
| 1070 | "unknown" in the :term:`LICENSE` |
| 1071 | field. You need to track down the license information for "unknown" |
| 1072 | modules and manually add the information to the recipe. |
| 1073 | |
| 1074 | ``recipetool`` creates a "shrinkwrap" file for your recipe. Shrinkwrap |
| 1075 | files capture the version of all dependent modules. Many packages do not |
| 1076 | provide shrinkwrap files but ``recipetool`` will create a shrinkwrap file as it |
| 1077 | runs. |
| 1078 | |
| 1079 | .. note:: |
| 1080 | |
| 1081 | A package is created for each sub-module. This policy is the only |
| 1082 | practical way to have the licenses for all of the dependencies |
| 1083 | represented in the license manifest of the image. |
| 1084 | |
| 1085 | The ``devtool edit-recipe`` command lets you take a look at the recipe:: |
| 1086 | |
| 1087 | $ devtool edit-recipe cute-files |
| 1088 | # Recipe created by recipetool |
| 1089 | # This is the basis of a recipe and may need further editing in order to be fully functional. |
| 1090 | # (Feel free to remove these comments when editing.) |
| 1091 | |
| 1092 | SUMMARY = "Turn any folder on your computer into a cute file browser, available on the local network." |
| 1093 | # WARNING: the following LICENSE and LIC_FILES_CHKSUM values are best guesses - it is |
| 1094 | # your responsibility to verify that the values are complete and correct. |
| 1095 | # |
| 1096 | # NOTE: multiple licenses have been detected; they have been separated with & |
| 1097 | # in the LICENSE value for now since it is a reasonable assumption that all |
| 1098 | # of the licenses apply. If instead there is a choice between the multiple |
| 1099 | # licenses then you should change the value to separate the licenses with | |
| 1100 | # instead of &. If there is any doubt, check the accompanying documentation |
| 1101 | # to determine which situation is applicable. |
| 1102 | |
| 1103 | SUMMARY = "Turn any folder on your computer into a cute file browser, available on the local network." |
| 1104 | LICENSE = "BSD-3-Clause & ISC & MIT" |
| 1105 | LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE;md5=71d98c0a1db42956787b1909c74a86ca \ |
| 1106 | file://node_modules/accepts/LICENSE;md5=bf1f9ad1e2e1d507aef4883fff7103de \ |
| 1107 | file://node_modules/array-flatten/LICENSE;md5=44088ba57cb871a58add36ce51b8de08 \ |
| 1108 | ... |
| 1109 | file://node_modules/cookie-signature/Readme.md;md5=57ae8b42de3dd0c1f22d5f4cf191e15a" |
| 1110 | |
| 1111 | SRC_URI = " \ |
| 1112 | npm://registry.npmjs.org/;package=cute-files;version=${PV} \ |
| 1113 | npmsw://${THISDIR}/${BPN}/npm-shrinkwrap.json \ |
| 1114 | " |
| 1115 | |
| 1116 | S = "${WORKDIR}/npm" |
| 1117 | |
| 1118 | inherit npm |
| 1119 | |
| 1120 | LICENSE:${PN} = "MIT" |
| 1121 | LICENSE:${PN}-accepts = "MIT" |
| 1122 | LICENSE:${PN}-array-flatten = "MIT" |
| 1123 | ... |
| 1124 | LICENSE:${PN}-vary = "MIT" |
| 1125 | |
| 1126 | Here are three key points in the previous example: |
| 1127 | |
| 1128 | - :term:`SRC_URI` uses the NPM |
| 1129 | scheme so that the NPM fetcher is used. |
| 1130 | |
| 1131 | - ``recipetool`` collects all the license information. If a |
| 1132 | sub-module's license is unavailable, the sub-module's name appears in |
| 1133 | the comments. |
| 1134 | |
| 1135 | - The ``inherit npm`` statement causes the :ref:`ref-classes-npm` class to |
| 1136 | package up all the modules. |
| 1137 | |
| 1138 | You can run the following command to build the ``cute-files`` package:: |
| 1139 | |
| 1140 | $ devtool build cute-files |
| 1141 | |
| 1142 | Remember that ``nodejs`` must be installed on |
| 1143 | the target before your package. |
| 1144 | |
| 1145 | Assuming 192.168.7.2 for the target's IP address, use the following |
| 1146 | command to deploy your package:: |
| 1147 | |
| 1148 | $ devtool deploy-target -s cute-files root@192.168.7.2 |
| 1149 | |
| 1150 | Once the package is installed on the target, you can |
| 1151 | test the application to show the contents of any directory:: |
| 1152 | |
| 1153 | $ cd /usr/lib/node_modules/cute-files |
| 1154 | $ cute-files |
| 1155 | |
| 1156 | On a browser, |
| 1157 | go to ``http://192.168.7.2:3000`` and you see the following: |
| 1158 | |
| 1159 | .. image:: figures/cute-files-npm-example.png |
| 1160 | :width: 100% |
| 1161 | |
| 1162 | You can find the recipe in ``workspace/recipes/cute-files``. You can use |
| 1163 | the recipe in any layer you choose. |
| 1164 | |
| 1165 | Using the NPM Projects Code Method |
| 1166 | ---------------------------------- |
| 1167 | |
| 1168 | Although it is useful to package modules already in the NPM registry, |
| 1169 | adding ``node.js`` projects under development is a more common developer |
| 1170 | use case. |
| 1171 | |
| 1172 | This section covers the NPM projects code method, which is very similar |
| 1173 | to the "registry" approach described in the previous section. In the NPM |
| 1174 | projects method, you provide ``devtool`` with an URL that points to the |
| 1175 | source files. |
| 1176 | |
| 1177 | Replicating the same example, (i.e. ``cute-files``) use the following |
| 1178 | command:: |
| 1179 | |
| 1180 | $ devtool add https://github.com/martinaglv/cute-files.git |
| 1181 | |
| 1182 | The recipe this command generates is very similar to the recipe created in |
| 1183 | the previous section. However, the :term:`SRC_URI` looks like the following:: |
| 1184 | |
| 1185 | SRC_URI = " \ |
| 1186 | git://github.com/martinaglv/cute-files.git;protocol=https;branch=master \ |
| 1187 | npmsw://${THISDIR}/${BPN}/npm-shrinkwrap.json \ |
| 1188 | " |
| 1189 | |
| 1190 | In this example, |
| 1191 | the main module is taken from the Git repository and dependencies are |
| 1192 | taken from the NPM registry. Other than those differences, the recipe is |
| 1193 | basically the same between the two methods. You can build and deploy the |
| 1194 | package exactly as described in the previous section that uses the |
| 1195 | registry modules method. |
| 1196 | |
| 1197 | Adding custom metadata to packages |
| 1198 | ================================== |
| 1199 | |
| 1200 | The variable |
| 1201 | :term:`PACKAGE_ADD_METADATA` |
| 1202 | can be used to add additional metadata to packages. This is reflected in |
| 1203 | the package control/spec file. To take the ipk format for example, the |
| 1204 | CONTROL file stored inside would contain the additional metadata as |
| 1205 | additional lines. |
| 1206 | |
| 1207 | The variable can be used in multiple ways, including using suffixes to |
| 1208 | set it for a specific package type and/or package. Note that the order |
| 1209 | of precedence is the same as this list: |
| 1210 | |
| 1211 | - ``PACKAGE_ADD_METADATA_<PKGTYPE>:<PN>`` |
| 1212 | |
| 1213 | - ``PACKAGE_ADD_METADATA_<PKGTYPE>`` |
| 1214 | |
| 1215 | - ``PACKAGE_ADD_METADATA:<PN>`` |
| 1216 | |
| 1217 | - :term:`PACKAGE_ADD_METADATA` |
| 1218 | |
| 1219 | `<PKGTYPE>` is a parameter and expected to be a distinct name of specific |
| 1220 | package type: |
| 1221 | |
| 1222 | - IPK for .ipk packages |
| 1223 | |
| 1224 | - DEB for .deb packages |
| 1225 | |
| 1226 | - RPM for .rpm packages |
| 1227 | |
| 1228 | `<PN>` is a parameter and expected to be a package name. |
| 1229 | |
| 1230 | The variable can contain multiple [one-line] metadata fields separated |
| 1231 | by the literal sequence '\\n'. The separator can be redefined using the |
| 1232 | variable flag ``separator``. |
| 1233 | |
| 1234 | Here is an example that adds two custom fields for ipk |
| 1235 | packages:: |
| 1236 | |
| 1237 | PACKAGE_ADD_METADATA_IPK = "Vendor: CustomIpk\nGroup:Applications/Spreadsheets" |
| 1238 | |