Patrick Williams | c124f4f | 2015-09-15 14:41:29 -0500 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | <!DOCTYPE chapter PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.2//EN" |
| 2 | "http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.2/docbookx.dtd" |
| 3 | [<!ENTITY % poky SYSTEM "../poky.ent"> %poky; ] > |
| 4 | |
| 5 | <appendix id='kernel-dev-concepts-appx'> |
| 6 | <title>Advanced Kernel Concepts</title> |
| 7 | |
| 8 | <section id='kernel-big-picture'> |
| 9 | <title>Yocto Project Kernel Development and Maintenance</title> |
| 10 | <para> |
| 11 | Kernels available through the Yocto Project, like other kernels, are based off the Linux |
| 12 | kernel releases from <ulink url='http://www.kernel.org'></ulink>. |
| 13 | At the beginning of a major development cycle, the Yocto Project team |
| 14 | chooses its kernel based on factors such as release timing, the anticipated release |
| 15 | timing of final upstream <filename>kernel.org</filename> versions, and Yocto Project |
| 16 | feature requirements. |
| 17 | Typically, the kernel chosen is in the |
| 18 | final stages of development by the community. |
| 19 | In other words, the kernel is in the release |
| 20 | candidate or "rc" phase and not yet a final release. |
| 21 | But, by being in the final stages of external development, the team knows that the |
| 22 | <filename>kernel.org</filename> final release will clearly be within the early stages of |
| 23 | the Yocto Project development window. |
| 24 | </para> |
| 25 | <para> |
| 26 | This balance allows the team to deliver the most up-to-date kernel |
| 27 | possible, while still ensuring that the team has a stable official release for |
| 28 | the baseline Linux kernel version. |
| 29 | </para> |
| 30 | <para> |
| 31 | The ultimate source for kernels available through the Yocto Project are released kernels |
| 32 | from <filename>kernel.org</filename>. |
| 33 | In addition to a foundational kernel from <filename>kernel.org</filename>, the |
| 34 | kernels available contain a mix of important new mainline |
| 35 | developments, non-mainline developments (when there is no alternative), |
| 36 | Board Support Package (BSP) developments, |
| 37 | and custom features. |
| 38 | These additions result in a commercially released Yocto Project Linux kernel that caters |
| 39 | to specific embedded designer needs for targeted hardware. |
| 40 | </para> |
| 41 | <para> |
| 42 | Once a kernel is officially released, the Yocto Project team goes into |
| 43 | their next development cycle, or upward revision (uprev) cycle, while still |
| 44 | continuing maintenance on the released kernel. |
| 45 | It is important to note that the most sustainable and stable way |
| 46 | to include feature development upstream is through a kernel uprev process. |
| 47 | Back-porting hundreds of individual fixes and minor features from various |
| 48 | kernel versions is not sustainable and can easily compromise quality. |
| 49 | </para> |
| 50 | <para> |
| 51 | During the uprev cycle, the Yocto Project team uses an ongoing analysis of |
| 52 | kernel development, BSP support, and release timing to select the best |
| 53 | possible <filename>kernel.org</filename> version. |
| 54 | The team continually monitors community kernel |
| 55 | development to look for significant features of interest. |
| 56 | The team does consider back-porting large features if they have a significant advantage. |
| 57 | User or community demand can also trigger a back-port or creation of new |
| 58 | functionality in the Yocto Project baseline kernel during the uprev cycle. |
| 59 | </para> |
| 60 | <para> |
| 61 | Generally speaking, every new kernel both adds features and introduces new bugs. |
| 62 | These consequences are the basic properties of upstream kernel development and are |
| 63 | managed by the Yocto Project team's kernel strategy. |
| 64 | It is the Yocto Project team's policy to not back-port minor features to the released kernel. |
| 65 | They only consider back-porting significant technological jumps - and, that is done |
| 66 | after a complete gap analysis. |
| 67 | The reason for this policy is that back-porting any small to medium sized change |
| 68 | from an evolving kernel can easily create mismatches, incompatibilities and very |
| 69 | subtle errors. |
| 70 | </para> |
| 71 | <para> |
| 72 | These policies result in both a stable and a cutting |
| 73 | edge kernel that mixes forward ports of existing features and significant and critical |
| 74 | new functionality. |
| 75 | Forward porting functionality in the kernels available through the Yocto Project kernel |
| 76 | can be thought of as a "micro uprev." |
| 77 | The many “micro uprevs” produce a kernel version with a mix of |
| 78 | important new mainline, non-mainline, BSP developments and feature integrations. |
| 79 | This kernel gives insight into new features and allows focused |
| 80 | amounts of testing to be done on the kernel, which prevents |
| 81 | surprises when selecting the next major uprev. |
| 82 | The quality of these cutting edge kernels is evolving and the kernels are used in leading edge |
| 83 | feature and BSP development. |
| 84 | </para> |
| 85 | </section> |
| 86 | |
| 87 | <section id='kernel-architecture'> |
| 88 | <title>Kernel Architecture</title> |
| 89 | <para> |
| 90 | This section describes the architecture of the kernels available through the |
| 91 | Yocto Project and provides information |
| 92 | on the mechanisms used to achieve that architecture. |
| 93 | </para> |
| 94 | |
| 95 | <section id='architecture-overview'> |
| 96 | <title>Overview</title> |
| 97 | <para> |
| 98 | As mentioned earlier, a key goal of the Yocto Project is to present the |
| 99 | developer with |
| 100 | a kernel that has a clear and continuous history that is visible to the user. |
| 101 | The architecture and mechanisms used achieve that goal in a manner similar to the |
| 102 | upstream <filename>kernel.org</filename>. |
| 103 | </para> |
| 104 | <para> |
| 105 | You can think of a Yocto Project kernel as consisting of a baseline Linux kernel with |
| 106 | added features logically structured on top of the baseline. |
| 107 | The features are tagged and organized by way of a branching strategy implemented by the |
| 108 | source code manager (SCM) Git. |
| 109 | For information on Git as applied to the Yocto Project, see the |
| 110 | "<ulink url='&YOCTO_DOCS_DEV_URL;#git'>Git</ulink>" section in the |
| 111 | Yocto Project Development Manual. |
| 112 | </para> |
| 113 | <para> |
| 114 | The result is that the user has the ability to see the added features and |
| 115 | the commits that make up those features. |
| 116 | In addition to being able to see added features, the user can also view the history of what |
| 117 | made up the baseline kernel. |
| 118 | </para> |
| 119 | <para> |
| 120 | The following illustration shows the conceptual Yocto Project kernel. |
| 121 | </para> |
| 122 | <para> |
| 123 | <imagedata fileref="figures/kernel-architecture-overview.png" width="6in" depth="7in" align="center" scale="100" /> |
| 124 | </para> |
| 125 | <para> |
| 126 | In the illustration, the "Kernel.org Branch Point" |
| 127 | marks the specific spot (or release) from |
| 128 | which the Yocto Project kernel is created. |
| 129 | From this point "up" in the tree, features and differences are organized and tagged. |
| 130 | </para> |
| 131 | <para> |
| 132 | The "Yocto Project Baseline Kernel" contains functionality that is common to every kernel |
| 133 | type and BSP that is organized further up the tree. |
| 134 | Placing these common features in the |
| 135 | tree this way means features do not have to be duplicated along individual branches of the |
| 136 | structure. |
| 137 | </para> |
| 138 | <para> |
| 139 | From the Yocto Project Baseline Kernel, branch points represent specific functionality |
| 140 | for individual BSPs as well as real-time kernels. |
| 141 | The illustration represents this through three BSP-specific branches and a real-time |
| 142 | kernel branch. |
| 143 | Each branch represents some unique functionality for the BSP or a real-time kernel. |
| 144 | </para> |
| 145 | <para> |
| 146 | In this example structure, the real-time kernel branch has common features for all |
| 147 | real-time kernels and contains |
| 148 | more branches for individual BSP-specific real-time kernels. |
| 149 | The illustration shows three branches as an example. |
| 150 | Each branch points the way to specific, unique features for a respective real-time |
| 151 | kernel as they apply to a given BSP. |
| 152 | </para> |
| 153 | <para> |
| 154 | The resulting tree structure presents a clear path of markers (or branches) to the |
| 155 | developer that, for all practical purposes, is the kernel needed for any given set |
| 156 | of requirements. |
| 157 | </para> |
| 158 | </section> |
| 159 | |
| 160 | <section id='branching-and-workflow'> |
| 161 | <title>Branching Strategy and Workflow</title> |
| 162 | <para> |
| 163 | The Yocto Project team creates kernel branches at points where functionality is |
| 164 | no longer shared and thus, needs to be isolated. |
| 165 | For example, board-specific incompatibilities would require different functionality |
| 166 | and would require a branch to separate the features. |
| 167 | Likewise, for specific kernel features, the same branching strategy is used. |
| 168 | </para> |
| 169 | <para> |
| 170 | This branching strategy results in a tree that has features organized to be specific |
| 171 | for particular functionality, single kernel types, or a subset of kernel types. |
| 172 | This strategy also results in not having to store the same feature twice |
| 173 | internally in the tree. |
| 174 | Rather, the kernel team stores the unique differences required to apply the |
| 175 | feature onto the kernel type in question. |
| 176 | <note> |
| 177 | The Yocto Project team strives to place features in the tree such that they can be |
| 178 | shared by all boards and kernel types where possible. |
| 179 | However, during development cycles or when large features are merged, |
| 180 | the team cannot always follow this practice. |
| 181 | In those cases, the team uses isolated branches to merge features. |
| 182 | </note> |
| 183 | </para> |
| 184 | <para> |
| 185 | BSP-specific code additions are handled in a similar manner to kernel-specific additions. |
| 186 | Some BSPs only make sense given certain kernel types. |
| 187 | So, for these types, the team creates branches off the end of that kernel type for all |
| 188 | of the BSPs that are supported on that kernel type. |
| 189 | From the perspective of the tools that create the BSP branch, the BSP is really no |
| 190 | different than a feature. |
| 191 | Consequently, the same branching strategy applies to BSPs as it does to features. |
| 192 | So again, rather than store the BSP twice, the team only stores the unique |
| 193 | differences for the BSP across the supported multiple kernels. |
| 194 | </para> |
| 195 | <para> |
| 196 | While this strategy can result in a tree with a significant number of branches, it is |
| 197 | important to realize that from the developer's point of view, there is a linear |
| 198 | path that travels from the baseline <filename>kernel.org</filename>, through a select |
| 199 | group of features and ends with their BSP-specific commits. |
| 200 | In other words, the divisions of the kernel are transparent and are not relevant |
| 201 | to the developer on a day-to-day basis. |
| 202 | From the developer's perspective, this path is the "master" branch. |
| 203 | The developer does not need to be aware of the existence of any other branches at all. |
| 204 | Of course, there is value in the existence of these branches |
| 205 | in the tree, should a person decide to explore them. |
| 206 | For example, a comparison between two BSPs at either the commit level or at the line-by-line |
| 207 | code <filename>diff</filename> level is now a trivial operation. |
| 208 | </para> |
| 209 | <para> |
| 210 | Working with the kernel as a structured tree follows recognized community best practices. |
| 211 | In particular, the kernel as shipped with the product, should be |
| 212 | considered an "upstream source" and viewed as a series of |
| 213 | historical and documented modifications (commits). |
| 214 | These modifications represent the development and stabilization done |
| 215 | by the Yocto Project kernel development team. |
| 216 | </para> |
| 217 | <para> |
| 218 | Because commits only change at significant release points in the product life cycle, |
| 219 | developers can work on a branch created |
| 220 | from the last relevant commit in the shipped Yocto Project kernel. |
| 221 | As mentioned previously, the structure is transparent to the developer |
| 222 | because the kernel tree is left in this state after cloning and building the kernel. |
| 223 | </para> |
| 224 | </section> |
| 225 | |
| 226 | <section id='source-code-manager-git'> |
| 227 | <title>Source Code Manager - Git</title> |
| 228 | <para> |
| 229 | The Source Code Manager (SCM) is Git. |
| 230 | This SCM is the obvious mechanism for meeting the previously mentioned goals. |
| 231 | Not only is it the SCM for <filename>kernel.org</filename> but, |
| 232 | Git continues to grow in popularity and supports many different work flows, |
| 233 | front-ends and management techniques. |
| 234 | </para> |
| 235 | <para> |
| 236 | You can find documentation on Git at <ulink url='http://git-scm.com/documentation'></ulink>. |
| 237 | You can also get an introduction to Git as it applies to the Yocto Project in the |
| 238 | "<ulink url='&YOCTO_DOCS_DEV_URL;#git'>Git</ulink>" |
| 239 | section in the Yocto Project Development Manual. |
| 240 | These referenced sections overview Git and describe a minimal set of |
| 241 | commands that allows you to be functional using Git. |
| 242 | <note> |
| 243 | You can use as much, or as little, of what Git has to offer to accomplish what |
| 244 | you need for your project. |
| 245 | You do not have to be a "Git Master" in order to use it with the Yocto Project. |
| 246 | </note> |
| 247 | </para> |
| 248 | </section> |
| 249 | </section> |
| 250 | </appendix> |
| 251 | <!-- |
| 252 | vim: expandtab tw=80 ts=4 |
| 253 | --> |