Andrew Geissler | f034379 | 2020-11-18 10:42:21 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | .. SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-2.0-UK |
Andrew Geissler | c9f7865 | 2020-09-18 14:11:35 -0500 | [diff] [blame] | 2 | |
| 3 | *********************************** |
| 4 | Project Testing and Release Process |
| 5 | *********************************** |
| 6 | |
Andrew Geissler | c9f7865 | 2020-09-18 14:11:35 -0500 | [diff] [blame] | 7 | Day to Day Development |
| 8 | ====================== |
| 9 | |
| 10 | This section details how the project tests changes, through automation |
| 11 | on the Autobuilder or with the assistance of QA teams, through to making |
| 12 | releases. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | The project aims to test changes against our test matrix before those |
| 15 | changes are merged into the master branch. As such, changes are queued |
| 16 | up in batches either in the ``master-next`` branch in the main trees, or |
| 17 | in user trees such as ``ross/mut`` in ``poky-contrib`` (Ross Burton |
| 18 | helps review and test patches and this is his testing tree). |
| 19 | |
| 20 | We have two broad categories of test builds, including "full" and |
| 21 | "quick". On the Autobuilder, these can be seen as "a-quick" and |
| 22 | "a-full", simply for ease of sorting in the UI. Use our Autobuilder |
| 23 | console view to see where me manage most test-related items, available |
| 24 | at: :yocto_ab:`/typhoon/#/console`. |
| 25 | |
| 26 | Builds are triggered manually when the test branches are ready. The |
| 27 | builds are monitored by the SWAT team. For additional information, see |
Andrew Geissler | 09209ee | 2020-12-13 08:44:15 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 28 | :yocto_wiki:`/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team`. |
Andrew Geissler | c9f7865 | 2020-09-18 14:11:35 -0500 | [diff] [blame] | 29 | If successful, the changes would usually be merged to the ``master`` |
| 30 | branch. If not successful, someone would respond to the changes on the |
| 31 | mailing list explaining that there was a failure in testing. The choice |
| 32 | of quick or full would depend on the type of changes and the speed with |
| 33 | which the result was required. |
| 34 | |
| 35 | The Autobuilder does build the ``master`` branch once daily for several |
| 36 | reasons, in particular, to ensure the current ``master`` branch does |
| 37 | build, but also to keep ``yocto-testresults`` |
Andrew Geissler | 09209ee | 2020-12-13 08:44:15 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 38 | (:yocto_git:`/yocto-testresults/`), |
Andrew Geissler | c9f7865 | 2020-09-18 14:11:35 -0500 | [diff] [blame] | 39 | buildhistory |
Andrew Geissler | 09209ee | 2020-12-13 08:44:15 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 40 | (:yocto_git:`/poky-buildhistory/`), and |
Andrew Geissler | c9f7865 | 2020-09-18 14:11:35 -0500 | [diff] [blame] | 41 | our sstate up to date. On the weekend, there is a master-next build |
| 42 | instead to ensure the test results are updated for the less frequently |
| 43 | run targets. |
| 44 | |
| 45 | Performance builds (buildperf-\* targets in the console) are triggered |
| 46 | separately every six hours and automatically push their results to the |
| 47 | buildstats repository at: |
Andrew Geissler | 09209ee | 2020-12-13 08:44:15 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 48 | :yocto_git:`/yocto-buildstats/`. |
Andrew Geissler | c9f7865 | 2020-09-18 14:11:35 -0500 | [diff] [blame] | 49 | |
| 50 | The 'quick' targets have been selected to be the ones which catch the |
| 51 | most failures or give the most valuable data. We run 'fast' ptests in |
| 52 | this case for example but not the ones which take a long time. The quick |
| 53 | target doesn't include \*-lsb builds for all architectures, some world |
| 54 | builds and doesn't trigger performance tests or ltp testing. The full |
| 55 | build includes all these things and is slower but more comprehensive. |
| 56 | |
| 57 | Release Builds |
| 58 | ============== |
| 59 | |
| 60 | The project typically has two major releases a year with a six month |
| 61 | cadence in April and October. Between these there would be a number of |
Andrew Geissler | 3b8a17c | 2021-04-15 15:55:55 -0500 | [diff] [blame] | 62 | milestone releases (usually four) with the final one being stabilization |
Andrew Geissler | c9f7865 | 2020-09-18 14:11:35 -0500 | [diff] [blame] | 63 | only along with point releases of our stable branches. |
| 64 | |
| 65 | The build and release process for these project releases is similar to |
Andrew Geissler | 3b8a17c | 2021-04-15 15:55:55 -0500 | [diff] [blame] | 66 | that in :ref:`test-manual/test-process:day to day development`, in that the |
Andrew Geissler | c9f7865 | 2020-09-18 14:11:35 -0500 | [diff] [blame] | 67 | a-full target of the Autobuilder is used but in addition the form is |
Andrew Geissler | 3b8a17c | 2021-04-15 15:55:55 -0500 | [diff] [blame] | 68 | configured to generate and publish artifacts and the milestone number, |
Andrew Geissler | c9f7865 | 2020-09-18 14:11:35 -0500 | [diff] [blame] | 69 | version, release candidate number and other information is entered. The |
| 70 | box to "generate an email to QA"is also checked. |
| 71 | |
| 72 | When the build completes, an email is sent out using the send-qa-email |
| 73 | script in the ``yocto-autobuilder-helper`` repository to the list of |
| 74 | people configured for that release. Release builds are placed into a |
| 75 | directory in https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases on the |
| 76 | Autobuilder which is included in the email. The process from here is |
| 77 | more manual and control is effectively passed to release engineering. |
| 78 | The next steps include: |
| 79 | |
| 80 | - QA teams respond to the email saying which tests they plan to run and |
| 81 | when the results will be available. |
| 82 | |
| 83 | - QA teams run their tests and share their results in the yocto- |
| 84 | testresults-contrib repository, along with a summary of their |
| 85 | findings. |
| 86 | |
| 87 | - Release engineering prepare the release as per their process. |
| 88 | |
| 89 | - Test results from the QA teams are included into the release in |
| 90 | separate directories and also uploaded to the yocto-testresults |
| 91 | repository alongside the other test results for the given revision. |
| 92 | |
| 93 | - The QA report in the final release is regenerated using resulttool to |
| 94 | include the new test results and the test summaries from the teams |
| 95 | (as headers to the generated report). |
| 96 | |
| 97 | - The release is checked against the release checklist and release |
| 98 | readiness criteria. |
| 99 | |
| 100 | - A final decision on whether to release is made by the YP TSC who have |
| 101 | final oversight on release readiness. |