| #include "ibm/locks.hpp" |
| |
| #include <string> |
| |
| #include <gmock/gmock.h> |
| #include <gtest/gtest.h> |
| |
| namespace crow::ibm_mc_lock |
| { |
| namespace |
| { |
| |
| using SType = std::string; |
| using LockRequest = std::tuple<SType, SType, SType, uint64_t, SegmentFlags>; |
| using LockRequests = std::vector<LockRequest>; |
| using Rc = |
| std::pair<bool, std::variant<uint32_t, std::pair<uint32_t, LockRequest>>>; |
| using RcRelaseLock = std::pair<bool, std::pair<uint32_t, LockRequest>>; |
| using RcGetLockList = |
| std::variant<std::string, std::vector<std::pair<uint32_t, LockRequests>>>; |
| using ListOfTransactionIds = std::vector<uint32_t>; |
| using RcAcquireLock = std::pair<bool, std::variant<Rc, std::pair<bool, int>>>; |
| using RcReleaseLockApi = std::pair<bool, std::variant<bool, RcRelaseLock>>; |
| using SessionFlags = std::pair<SType, SType>; |
| using ListOfSessionIds = std::vector<std::string>; |
| using ::testing::IsEmpty; |
| |
| class LockTest : public ::testing::Test |
| { |
| protected: |
| LockRequests request; |
| LockRequests request1, request2; |
| LockRequest record; |
| |
| public: |
| LockTest() |
| { |
| record = { |
| "xxxxx", "hmc-id", "Read", 234, {{"DontLock", 2}, {"DontLock", 4}}}; |
| // lockrequest with multiple lockrequests |
| request = {{"xxxxx", |
| "hmc-id", |
| "Read", |
| 234, |
| {{"DontLock", 2}, {"DontLock", 4}}}, |
| {"xxxxx", |
| "hmc-id", |
| "Read", |
| 234, |
| {{"DontLock", 2}, {"DontLock", 4}}}}; |
| request1 = {{"xxxxx", |
| "hmc-id", |
| "Read", |
| 234, |
| {{"DontLock", 2}, {"DontLock", 4}}}}; |
| request2 = {{"xxxxx", |
| "hmc-id", |
| "Write", |
| 234, |
| {{"LockAll", 2}, {"DontLock", 4}}}}; |
| } |
| |
| ~LockTest() override = default; |
| |
| LockTest(const LockTest&) = delete; |
| LockTest(LockTest&&) = delete; |
| LockTest& operator=(const LockTest&) = delete; |
| LockTest& operator=(const LockTest&&) = delete; |
| }; |
| |
| class MockLock : public crow::ibm_mc_lock::Lock |
| { |
| public: |
| bool isValidLockRequest(const LockRequest& record1) override |
| { |
| bool status = Lock::isValidLockRequest(record1); |
| return status; |
| } |
| bool isConflictRequest(const LockRequests& request) override |
| { |
| bool status = Lock::isConflictRequest(request); |
| return status; |
| } |
| Rc isConflictWithTable(const LockRequests& request) override |
| { |
| auto conflict = Lock::isConflictWithTable(request); |
| return conflict; |
| } |
| uint32_t generateTransactionId() override |
| { |
| uint32_t tid = Lock::generateTransactionId(); |
| return tid; |
| } |
| |
| bool validateRids(const ListOfTransactionIds& tids) override |
| { |
| bool status = Lock::validateRids(tids); |
| return status; |
| } |
| RcRelaseLock isItMyLock(const ListOfTransactionIds& tids, |
| const SessionFlags& ids) override |
| { |
| auto status = Lock::isItMyLock(tids, ids); |
| return status; |
| } |
| RcGetLockList getList(const std::vector<std::string>& listSessionid) |
| { |
| auto status = Lock::getLockList(listSessionid); |
| return status; |
| } |
| friend class LockTest; |
| }; |
| |
| TEST_F(LockTest, ValidationGoodTestCase) |
| { |
| MockLock lockManager; |
| const LockRequest& t = record; |
| EXPECT_TRUE(lockManager.isValidLockRequest(t)); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(LockTest, ValidationBadTestWithLocktype) |
| { |
| MockLock lockManager; |
| // Corrupt the lock type |
| std::get<2>(record) = "rwrite"; |
| const LockRequest& t = record; |
| EXPECT_FALSE(lockManager.isValidLockRequest(t)); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(LockTest, ValidationBadTestWithlockFlags) |
| { |
| MockLock lockManager; |
| // Corrupt the lockflag |
| std::get<4>(record)[0].first = "lock"; |
| const LockRequest& t = record; |
| EXPECT_FALSE(lockManager.isValidLockRequest(t)); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(LockTest, ValidationBadTestWithSegmentlength) |
| { |
| MockLock lockManager; |
| // Corrupt the Segment length |
| std::get<4>(record)[0].second = 7; |
| const LockRequest& t = record; |
| EXPECT_FALSE(lockManager.isValidLockRequest(t)); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(LockTest, MultiRequestWithoutConflict) |
| { |
| MockLock lockManager; |
| const LockRequests& t = request; |
| EXPECT_FALSE(lockManager.isConflictRequest(t)); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(LockTest, MultiRequestWithConflictduetoSameSegmentLength) |
| { |
| MockLock lockManager; |
| // Corrupt the locktype |
| std::get<2>(request[0]) = "Write"; |
| // Match the segment lengths to points them to lock similar kind of |
| // resource |
| std::get<4>(request[0])[0].first = "LockAll"; |
| const LockRequests& t = request; |
| EXPECT_TRUE(lockManager.isConflictRequest(t)); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(LockTest, MultiRequestWithoutConflictduetoDifferentSegmentData) |
| { |
| MockLock lockManager; |
| // Corrupt the locktype |
| std::get<2>(request[0]) = "Write"; |
| // Match the segment lengths to points them to lock similar kind of |
| // resource |
| std::get<4>(request[0])[0].first = "DontLock"; |
| std::get<4>(request[0])[1].first = "LockAll"; |
| |
| // Change the resource id(2nd byte) of first record, so the locks are |
| // different so no conflict |
| std::get<3>(request[0]) = 216179379183550464; // HEX 03 00 06 00 00 00 00 00 |
| std::get<3>(request[1]) = 288236973221478400; // HEX 04 00 06 00 00 00 00 00 |
| const LockRequests& t = request; |
| EXPECT_FALSE(lockManager.isConflictRequest(t)); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(LockTest, MultiRequestWithConflictduetoSameSegmentData) |
| { |
| MockLock lockManager; |
| // Corrupt the locktype |
| std::get<2>(request[0]) = "Write"; |
| // Match the segment lengths to points them to lock similar kind of |
| // resource |
| std::get<4>(request[0])[0].first = "DontLock"; |
| std::get<4>(request[0])[1].first = "LockAll"; |
| // Dont Change the resource id(1st & 2nd byte) at all, so that the |
| // conflict occurs from the second segment which is trying to lock all |
| // the resources. |
| std::get<3>(request[0]) = 216173882346831872; // 03 00 01 00 2B 00 00 00 |
| std::get<3>(request[1]) = 216173882346831872; // 03 00 01 00 2B 00 00 00 |
| const LockRequests& t = request; |
| EXPECT_TRUE(lockManager.isConflictRequest(t)); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(LockTest, MultiRequestWithoutConflictduetoDifferentSegmentLength) |
| { |
| MockLock lockManager; |
| // Corrupt the locktype |
| std::get<2>(request[0]) = "Write"; |
| // Match the segment lengths to points them to lock similar kind of |
| // resource |
| std::get<4>(request[0])[0].first = "LockSame"; |
| // Change the segment length , so that the requests are trying to lock |
| // two different kind of resources |
| std::get<4>(request[0])[0].second = 3; |
| const LockRequests& t = request; |
| // Return No Conflict |
| EXPECT_FALSE(lockManager.isConflictRequest(t)); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(LockTest, MultiRequestWithoutConflictduetoReadLocktype) |
| { |
| MockLock lockManager; |
| // Match the segment lengths to points them to lock similar kind of |
| // resource |
| std::get<4>(request[0])[0].first = "LockAll"; |
| const LockRequests& t = request; |
| // Return No Conflict |
| EXPECT_FALSE(lockManager.isConflictRequest(t)); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(LockTest, MultiRequestWithoutConflictduetoReadLocktypeAndLockall) |
| { |
| MockLock lockManager; |
| // Match the segment lengths to points them to lock similar kind of |
| // resource |
| std::get<4>(request[0])[0].first = "LockAll"; |
| std::get<4>(request[0])[1].first = "LockAll"; |
| const LockRequests& t = request; |
| // Return No Conflict |
| EXPECT_FALSE(lockManager.isConflictRequest(t)); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(LockTest, RequestConflictedWithLockTableEntries) |
| { |
| MockLock lockManager; |
| const LockRequests& t = request1; |
| auto rc1 = lockManager.isConflictWithTable(t); |
| // Corrupt the lock type |
| std::get<2>(request[0]) = "Write"; |
| // Corrupt the lockflag |
| std::get<4>(request[0])[1].first = "LockAll"; |
| const LockRequests& p = request; |
| auto rc2 = lockManager.isConflictWithTable(p); |
| // Return a Conflict |
| EXPECT_TRUE(rc2.first); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(LockTest, RequestNotConflictedWithLockTableEntries) |
| { |
| MockLock lockManager; |
| const LockRequests& t = request1; |
| // Insert the request1 into the lock table |
| auto rc1 = lockManager.isConflictWithTable(t); |
| // Corrupt the lock type |
| std::get<2>(request[0]) = "Read"; |
| // Corrupt the lockflag |
| std::get<4>(request[0])[1].first = "LockAll"; |
| const LockRequests& p = request; |
| auto rc2 = lockManager.isConflictWithTable(p); |
| // Return No Conflict |
| EXPECT_FALSE(rc2.first); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(LockTest, TestGenerateTransactionIDFunction) |
| { |
| MockLock lockManager; |
| uint32_t transactionId1 = lockManager.generateTransactionId(); |
| uint32_t transactionId2 = lockManager.generateTransactionId(); |
| EXPECT_EQ(transactionId2, ++transactionId1); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(LockTest, ValidateTransactionIDsGoodTestCase) |
| { |
| MockLock lockManager; |
| const LockRequests& t = request1; |
| // Insert the request1 into the lock table |
| auto rc1 = lockManager.isConflictWithTable(t); |
| std::vector<uint32_t> tids = {1}; |
| const std::vector<uint32_t>& p = tids; |
| EXPECT_TRUE(lockManager.validateRids(p)); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(LockTest, ValidateTransactionIDsBadTestCase) |
| { |
| MockLock lockManager; |
| // Insert the request1 into the lock table |
| const LockRequests& t = request1; |
| auto rc1 = lockManager.isConflictWithTable(t); |
| std::vector<uint32_t> tids = {10}; |
| const std::vector<uint32_t>& p = tids; |
| EXPECT_FALSE(lockManager.validateRids(p)); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(LockTest, ValidateisItMyLockGoodTestCase) |
| { |
| MockLock lockManager; |
| // Insert the request1 into the lock table |
| const LockRequests& t = request1; |
| auto rc1 = lockManager.isConflictWithTable(t); |
| std::vector<uint32_t> tids = {1}; |
| const std::vector<uint32_t>& p = tids; |
| std::string hmcid = "hmc-id"; |
| std::string sessionid = "xxxxx"; |
| std::pair<SType, SType> ids = std::make_pair(hmcid, sessionid); |
| auto rc = lockManager.isItMyLock(p, ids); |
| EXPECT_TRUE(rc.first); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(LockTest, ValidateisItMyLockBadTestCase) |
| { |
| MockLock lockManager; |
| // Corrupt the client identifier |
| std::get<1>(request1[0]) = "randomid"; |
| // Insert the request1 into the lock table |
| const LockRequests& t = request1; |
| auto rc1 = lockManager.isConflictWithTable(t); |
| std::vector<uint32_t> tids = {1}; |
| const std::vector<uint32_t>& p = tids; |
| std::string hmcid = "hmc-id"; |
| std::string sessionid = "random"; |
| std::pair<SType, SType> ids = std::make_pair(hmcid, sessionid); |
| auto rc = lockManager.isItMyLock(p, ids); |
| EXPECT_FALSE(rc.first); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(LockTest, ValidateSessionIDForGetlocklistBadTestCase) |
| { |
| MockLock lockManager; |
| // Insert the request1 into the lock table |
| const LockRequests& t = request1; |
| auto rc1 = lockManager.isConflictWithTable(t); |
| std::vector<std::string> sessionid = {"random"}; |
| auto status = lockManager.getLockList(sessionid); |
| auto result = |
| std::get<std::vector<std::pair<uint32_t, LockRequests>>>(status); |
| EXPECT_THAT(result, IsEmpty()); |
| } |
| |
| TEST_F(LockTest, ValidateSessionIDForGetlocklistGoodTestCase) |
| { |
| MockLock lockManager; |
| // Insert the request1 into the lock table |
| const LockRequests& t = request1; |
| auto rc1 = lockManager.isConflictWithTable(t); |
| std::vector<std::string> sessionid = {"xxxxx"}; |
| auto status = lockManager.getLockList(sessionid); |
| auto result = |
| std::get<std::vector<std::pair<uint32_t, LockRequests>>>(status); |
| EXPECT_EQ(result.size(), 1); |
| } |
| |
| } // namespace |
| } // namespace crow::ibm_mc_lock |