manojkiraneda | 0b631ae | 2019-12-03 17:54:28 +0530 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | #pragma once |
| 2 | |
| 3 | #include <app.h> |
| 4 | |
| 5 | #include <boost/algorithm/string.hpp> |
| 6 | #include <boost/container/flat_map.hpp> |
| 7 | #include <filesystem> |
| 8 | #include <nlohmann/json.hpp> |
| 9 | |
| 10 | namespace crow |
| 11 | { |
| 12 | namespace ibm_mc_lock |
| 13 | { |
| 14 | |
| 15 | namespace fs = std::filesystem; |
| 16 | using SType = std::string; |
| 17 | |
| 18 | /*---------------------------------------- |
| 19 | |Segment flags : LockFlag | SegmentLength| |
| 20 | ------------------------------------------*/ |
| 21 | |
| 22 | using SegmentFlags = std::vector<std::pair<SType, uint32_t>>; |
| 23 | |
| 24 | // Lockrequest = session-id | hmc-id | locktype | resourceid | segmentinfo |
| 25 | using LockRequest = std::tuple<SType, SType, SType, uint64_t, SegmentFlags>; |
manojkiraneda | 0b631ae | 2019-12-03 17:54:28 +0530 | [diff] [blame] | 26 | using LockRequests = std::vector<LockRequest>; |
| 27 | using Rc = |
| 28 | std::pair<bool, std::variant<uint32_t, std::pair<uint32_t, LockRequest>>>; |
manojkiraneda | 3b6dea6 | 2019-12-13 17:05:36 +0530 | [diff] [blame] | 29 | using RcRelaseLock = std::pair<bool, std::pair<uint32_t, LockRequest>>; |
manojkiraneda | 402b571 | 2019-12-13 17:07:09 +0530 | [diff] [blame^] | 30 | using RcGetLockList = |
| 31 | std::variant<std::string, std::vector<std::pair<uint32_t, LockRequests>>>; |
manojkiraneda | 3b6dea6 | 2019-12-13 17:05:36 +0530 | [diff] [blame] | 32 | using ListOfTransactionIds = std::vector<uint32_t>; |
manojkiraneda | 0b631ae | 2019-12-03 17:54:28 +0530 | [diff] [blame] | 33 | using RcAcquireLock = std::pair<bool, std::variant<Rc, std::pair<bool, int>>>; |
manojkiraneda | 3b6dea6 | 2019-12-13 17:05:36 +0530 | [diff] [blame] | 34 | using RcReleaseLockApi = std::pair<bool, std::variant<bool, RcRelaseLock>>; |
| 35 | using SessionFlags = std::pair<SType, SType>; |
manojkiraneda | 402b571 | 2019-12-13 17:07:09 +0530 | [diff] [blame^] | 36 | using ListOfSessionIds = std::vector<std::string>; |
manojkiraneda | 0b631ae | 2019-12-03 17:54:28 +0530 | [diff] [blame] | 37 | |
| 38 | class Lock |
| 39 | { |
| 40 | uint32_t transactionId; |
| 41 | boost::container::flat_map<uint32_t, LockRequests> lockTable; |
| 42 | |
| 43 | /* |
| 44 | * This function implements the logic for validating an incomming |
| 45 | * lock request/requests. |
| 46 | * |
| 47 | * Returns : True (if Valid) |
| 48 | * Returns : False (if not a Valid lock request) |
| 49 | */ |
| 50 | |
| 51 | bool isValidLockRequest(const LockRequest); |
| 52 | |
| 53 | /* |
| 54 | * This function implements the logic of checking if the incomming |
| 55 | * multi-lock request is not having conflicting requirements. |
| 56 | * |
| 57 | * Returns : True (if conflicting) |
| 58 | * Returns : False (if not conflicting) |
| 59 | */ |
| 60 | |
| 61 | bool isConflictRequest(const LockRequests); |
| 62 | /* |
| 63 | * Implements the core algorithm to find the conflicting |
| 64 | * lock requests. |
| 65 | * |
| 66 | * This functions takes two lock requests and check if both |
| 67 | * are conflicting to each other. |
| 68 | * |
| 69 | * Returns : True (if conflicting) |
| 70 | * Returns : False (if not conflicting) |
| 71 | */ |
| 72 | bool isConflictRecord(const LockRequest, const LockRequest); |
| 73 | |
| 74 | /* |
| 75 | * This function implements the logic of checking the conflicting |
| 76 | * locks from a incomming single/multi lock requests with the already |
| 77 | * existing lock request in the lock table. |
| 78 | * |
| 79 | */ |
| 80 | |
| 81 | Rc isConflictWithTable(const LockRequests); |
manojkiraneda | 3b6dea6 | 2019-12-13 17:05:36 +0530 | [diff] [blame] | 82 | /* |
| 83 | * This function implements the logic of checking the ownership of the |
| 84 | * lock from the releaselock request. |
| 85 | * |
| 86 | * Returns : True (if the requesting HMC & Session owns the lock(s)) |
| 87 | * Returns : False (if the request HMC or Session does not own the lock(s)) |
| 88 | */ |
| 89 | |
| 90 | RcRelaseLock isItMyLock(const ListOfTransactionIds &, const SessionFlags &); |
| 91 | |
| 92 | /* |
| 93 | * This function validates the the list of transactionID's and returns false |
| 94 | * if the transaction ID is not valid & not present in the lock table |
| 95 | */ |
| 96 | |
| 97 | bool validateRids(const ListOfTransactionIds &); |
| 98 | |
| 99 | /* |
| 100 | * This function releases the locks that are already obtained by the |
| 101 | * requesting Management console. |
| 102 | */ |
| 103 | |
| 104 | void releaseLock(const ListOfTransactionIds &); |
manojkiraneda | 0b631ae | 2019-12-03 17:54:28 +0530 | [diff] [blame] | 105 | |
| 106 | /* |
| 107 | * This function implements the algorithm for checking the respective |
| 108 | * bytes of the resource id based on the lock management algorithm. |
| 109 | */ |
| 110 | |
| 111 | bool checkByte(uint64_t, uint64_t, uint32_t); |
| 112 | |
| 113 | /* |
| 114 | * This functions implements a counter that generates a unique 32 bit |
| 115 | * number for every successful transaction. This number will be used by |
| 116 | * the Management Console for debug. |
| 117 | */ |
| 118 | uint32_t generateTransactionId(); |
| 119 | |
| 120 | public: |
| 121 | /* |
| 122 | * This function implements the logic for acquiring a lock on a |
| 123 | * resource if the incomming request is legitimate without any |
| 124 | * conflicting requirements & without any conflicting requirement |
| 125 | * with the exsiting locks in the lock table. |
| 126 | * |
| 127 | */ |
| 128 | |
| 129 | RcAcquireLock acquireLock(const LockRequests); |
| 130 | |
manojkiraneda | 3b6dea6 | 2019-12-13 17:05:36 +0530 | [diff] [blame] | 131 | /* |
| 132 | * This function implements the logic for releasing the lock that are |
| 133 | * owned by a management console session. |
| 134 | * |
| 135 | * The locks can be released by two ways |
| 136 | * - Using list of transaction ID's |
| 137 | * - Using a Session ID |
| 138 | * |
| 139 | * Client can choose either of the ways by using `Type` JSON key. |
| 140 | * |
| 141 | */ |
| 142 | RcReleaseLockApi releaseLock(const ListOfTransactionIds &, |
| 143 | const SessionFlags &); |
| 144 | |
manojkiraneda | 402b571 | 2019-12-13 17:07:09 +0530 | [diff] [blame^] | 145 | /* |
| 146 | * This function implements the logic for getting the list of locks obtained |
| 147 | * by a particular management console. |
| 148 | */ |
| 149 | RcGetLockList getLockList(const ListOfSessionIds &); |
| 150 | |
manojkiraneda | 0b631ae | 2019-12-03 17:54:28 +0530 | [diff] [blame] | 151 | Lock() |
| 152 | { |
| 153 | transactionId = 0; |
| 154 | } |
| 155 | |
| 156 | } lockObject; |
| 157 | |
manojkiraneda | 402b571 | 2019-12-13 17:07:09 +0530 | [diff] [blame^] | 158 | RcGetLockList Lock::getLockList(const ListOfSessionIds &listSessionId) |
| 159 | { |
| 160 | |
| 161 | std::vector<std::pair<uint32_t, LockRequests>> lockList; |
| 162 | |
| 163 | if (!lockTable.empty()) |
| 164 | { |
| 165 | for (const auto &i : listSessionId) |
| 166 | { |
| 167 | auto it = lockTable.begin(); |
| 168 | while (it != lockTable.end()) |
| 169 | { |
| 170 | // Check if session id of this entry matches with session id |
| 171 | // given |
| 172 | if (std::get<0>(it->second[0]) == i) |
| 173 | { |
| 174 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << "Session id is found in the locktable"; |
| 175 | |
| 176 | // Push the whole lock record into a vector for returning |
| 177 | // the json |
| 178 | lockList.push_back(std::make_pair(it->first, it->second)); |
| 179 | } |
| 180 | // Go to next entry in map |
| 181 | it++; |
| 182 | } |
| 183 | } |
| 184 | } |
| 185 | // we may have found at least one entry with the given session id |
| 186 | // return the json list of lock records pertaining to the given |
| 187 | // session id, or send an empty list if lock table is empty |
| 188 | return lockList; |
| 189 | } |
| 190 | |
manojkiraneda | 3b6dea6 | 2019-12-13 17:05:36 +0530 | [diff] [blame] | 191 | RcReleaseLockApi Lock::releaseLock(const ListOfTransactionIds &p, |
| 192 | const SessionFlags &ids) |
| 193 | { |
| 194 | |
| 195 | bool status = validateRids(p); |
| 196 | |
| 197 | if (!status) |
| 198 | { |
| 199 | // Validation of rids failed |
| 200 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << "Not a Valid request id"; |
| 201 | return std::make_pair(false, status); |
| 202 | } |
| 203 | else |
| 204 | { |
| 205 | // Validation passed, check if all the locks are owned by the |
| 206 | // requesting HMC |
| 207 | auto status = isItMyLock(p, ids); |
| 208 | if (status.first) |
| 209 | { |
| 210 | // The current hmc owns all the locks, so we can release |
| 211 | // them |
| 212 | releaseLock(p); |
| 213 | } |
| 214 | return std::make_pair(true, status); |
| 215 | } |
| 216 | return std::make_pair(false, status); |
| 217 | } |
| 218 | |
manojkiraneda | 0b631ae | 2019-12-03 17:54:28 +0530 | [diff] [blame] | 219 | RcAcquireLock Lock::acquireLock(const LockRequests lockRequestStructure) |
| 220 | { |
| 221 | |
| 222 | // validate the lock request |
| 223 | |
| 224 | for (auto &lockRecord : lockRequestStructure) |
| 225 | { |
| 226 | bool status = isValidLockRequest(lockRecord); |
| 227 | if (!status) |
| 228 | { |
| 229 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << "Not a Valid record"; |
| 230 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << "Bad json in request"; |
| 231 | return std::make_pair(true, std::make_pair(status, 0)); |
| 232 | } |
| 233 | } |
| 234 | // check for conflict record |
| 235 | |
| 236 | const LockRequests &multiRequest = lockRequestStructure; |
| 237 | bool status = isConflictRequest(multiRequest); |
| 238 | |
| 239 | if (status) |
| 240 | { |
| 241 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << "There is a conflict within itself"; |
| 242 | return std::make_pair(true, std::make_pair(status, 1)); |
| 243 | } |
| 244 | else |
| 245 | { |
| 246 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << "The request is not conflicting within itself"; |
| 247 | |
| 248 | // Need to check for conflict with the locktable entries. |
| 249 | |
| 250 | auto conflict = isConflictWithTable(multiRequest); |
| 251 | |
| 252 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << "Done with checking conflict with the locktable"; |
| 253 | return std::make_pair(false, conflict); |
| 254 | } |
| 255 | |
| 256 | return std::make_pair(true, std::make_pair(true, 1)); |
| 257 | } |
| 258 | |
manojkiraneda | 3b6dea6 | 2019-12-13 17:05:36 +0530 | [diff] [blame] | 259 | void Lock::releaseLock(const ListOfTransactionIds &refRids) |
| 260 | { |
| 261 | for (const auto &id : refRids) |
| 262 | { |
| 263 | if (lockTable.erase(id)) |
| 264 | { |
| 265 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << "Removing the locks with transaction ID : " |
| 266 | << id; |
| 267 | } |
| 268 | |
| 269 | else |
| 270 | { |
| 271 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << "Removing the locks from the lock table " |
| 272 | "failed, tranasction ID: " |
| 273 | << id; |
| 274 | } |
| 275 | } |
| 276 | } |
| 277 | |
| 278 | RcRelaseLock Lock::isItMyLock(const ListOfTransactionIds &refRids, |
| 279 | const SessionFlags &ids) |
| 280 | { |
| 281 | for (const auto &id : refRids) |
| 282 | { |
| 283 | // Just need to compare the client id of the first lock records in the |
| 284 | // complete lock row(in the map), because the rest of the lock records |
| 285 | // would have the same client id |
| 286 | |
| 287 | std::string expectedClientId = std::get<1>(lockTable[id][0]); |
| 288 | std::string expectedSessionId = std::get<0>(lockTable[id][0]); |
| 289 | |
| 290 | if ((expectedClientId == ids.first) && |
| 291 | (expectedSessionId == ids.second)) |
| 292 | { |
| 293 | // It is owned by the currently request hmc |
| 294 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << "Lock is owned by the current hmc"; |
| 295 | } |
| 296 | else |
| 297 | { |
| 298 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << "Lock is not owned by the current hmc"; |
| 299 | return std::make_pair(false, std::make_pair(id, lockTable[id][0])); |
| 300 | } |
| 301 | } |
| 302 | return std::make_pair(true, std::make_pair(0, LockRequest())); |
| 303 | } |
| 304 | |
| 305 | bool Lock::validateRids(const ListOfTransactionIds &refRids) |
| 306 | { |
| 307 | for (const auto &id : refRids) |
| 308 | { |
| 309 | auto search = lockTable.find(id); |
| 310 | |
| 311 | if (search != lockTable.end()) |
| 312 | { |
| 313 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << "Valid Transaction id"; |
| 314 | // continue for the next rid |
| 315 | } |
| 316 | else |
| 317 | { |
| 318 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << "Atleast 1 inValid Request id"; |
| 319 | return false; |
| 320 | } |
| 321 | } |
| 322 | return true; |
| 323 | } |
| 324 | |
manojkiraneda | 0b631ae | 2019-12-03 17:54:28 +0530 | [diff] [blame] | 325 | bool Lock::isValidLockRequest(const LockRequest refLockRecord) |
| 326 | { |
| 327 | |
| 328 | // validate the locktype |
| 329 | |
| 330 | if (!((boost::equals(std::get<2>(refLockRecord), "Read") || |
| 331 | (boost::equals(std::get<2>(refLockRecord), "Write"))))) |
| 332 | { |
| 333 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << "Validation of LockType Failed"; |
| 334 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << "Locktype : " << std::get<2>(refLockRecord); |
| 335 | return false; |
| 336 | } |
| 337 | |
| 338 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << static_cast<int>(std::get<4>(refLockRecord).size()); |
| 339 | |
| 340 | // validate the number of segments |
| 341 | // Allowed No of segments are between 2 and 6 |
| 342 | if ((static_cast<int>(std::get<4>(refLockRecord).size()) > 6) || |
| 343 | (static_cast<int>(std::get<4>(refLockRecord).size()) < 2)) |
| 344 | { |
| 345 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << "Validation of Number of Segements Failed"; |
| 346 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << "Number of Segments provied : " |
| 347 | << sizeof(std::get<4>(refLockRecord)); |
| 348 | return false; |
| 349 | } |
| 350 | |
| 351 | int lockFlag = 0; |
| 352 | // validate the lockflags & segment length |
| 353 | |
| 354 | for (const auto &p : std::get<4>(refLockRecord)) |
| 355 | { |
| 356 | |
| 357 | // validate the lock flags |
| 358 | // Allowed lockflags are locksame,lockall & dontlock |
| 359 | |
| 360 | if (!((boost::equals(p.first, "LockSame") || |
| 361 | (boost::equals(p.first, "LockAll")) || |
| 362 | (boost::equals(p.first, "DontLock"))))) |
| 363 | { |
| 364 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << "Validation of lock flags failed"; |
| 365 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << p.first; |
| 366 | return false; |
| 367 | } |
| 368 | |
| 369 | // validate the segment length |
| 370 | // Allowed values of segment length are between 1 and 4 |
| 371 | |
| 372 | if (p.second < 1 || p.second > 4) |
| 373 | { |
| 374 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << "Validation of Segment Length Failed"; |
| 375 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << p.second; |
| 376 | return false; |
| 377 | } |
| 378 | |
| 379 | if ((boost::equals(p.first, "LockSame") || |
| 380 | (boost::equals(p.first, "LockAll")))) |
| 381 | { |
| 382 | ++lockFlag; |
| 383 | if (lockFlag >= 2) |
| 384 | { |
| 385 | return false; |
| 386 | } |
| 387 | } |
| 388 | } |
| 389 | |
manojkiraneda | 0b631ae | 2019-12-03 17:54:28 +0530 | [diff] [blame] | 390 | return true; |
| 391 | } |
| 392 | |
| 393 | Rc Lock::isConflictWithTable(const LockRequests refLockRequestStructure) |
| 394 | { |
| 395 | |
| 396 | uint32_t transactionId; |
| 397 | |
| 398 | if (lockTable.empty()) |
| 399 | { |
| 400 | transactionId = generateTransactionId(); |
| 401 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << transactionId; |
| 402 | // Lock table is empty, so we are safe to add the lockrecords |
| 403 | // as there will be no conflict |
| 404 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << "Lock table is empty, so adding the lockrecords"; |
| 405 | lockTable.emplace(std::pair<uint32_t, LockRequests>( |
| 406 | transactionId, refLockRequestStructure)); |
| 407 | |
| 408 | return std::make_pair(false, transactionId); |
| 409 | } |
| 410 | |
| 411 | else |
| 412 | { |
| 413 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG |
| 414 | << "Lock table is not empty, check for conflict with lock table"; |
| 415 | // Lock table is not empty, compare the lockrequest entries with |
| 416 | // the entries in the lock table |
| 417 | |
| 418 | for (const auto &lockRecord1 : refLockRequestStructure) |
| 419 | { |
| 420 | for (const auto &map : lockTable) |
| 421 | { |
| 422 | for (const auto &lockRecord2 : map.second) |
| 423 | { |
| 424 | bool status = isConflictRecord(lockRecord1, lockRecord2); |
| 425 | if (status) |
| 426 | { |
| 427 | return std::make_pair( |
| 428 | true, std::make_pair(map.first, lockRecord2)); |
| 429 | } |
| 430 | } |
| 431 | } |
| 432 | } |
| 433 | |
| 434 | // Reached here, so no conflict with the locktable, so we are safe to |
| 435 | // add the request records into the lock table |
| 436 | |
| 437 | // Lock table is empty, so we are safe to add the lockrecords |
| 438 | // as there will be no conflict |
| 439 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << " Adding elements into lock table"; |
| 440 | transactionId = generateTransactionId(); |
| 441 | lockTable.emplace( |
| 442 | std::make_pair(transactionId, refLockRequestStructure)); |
| 443 | } |
| 444 | return std::make_pair(false, transactionId); |
| 445 | } |
| 446 | |
| 447 | bool Lock::isConflictRequest(const LockRequests refLockRequestStructure) |
| 448 | { |
| 449 | // check for all the locks coming in as a part of single request |
| 450 | // return conflict if any two lock requests are conflicting |
| 451 | |
| 452 | if (refLockRequestStructure.size() == 1) |
| 453 | { |
| 454 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << "Only single lock request, so there is no conflict"; |
| 455 | // This means , we have only one lock request in the current |
| 456 | // request , so no conflict within the request |
| 457 | return false; |
| 458 | } |
| 459 | |
| 460 | else |
| 461 | { |
| 462 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG |
| 463 | << "There are multiple lock requests coming in a single request"; |
| 464 | |
| 465 | // There are multiple requests a part of one request |
| 466 | |
| 467 | for (uint32_t i = 0; i < refLockRequestStructure.size(); i++) |
| 468 | { |
| 469 | for (uint32_t j = i + 1; j < refLockRequestStructure.size(); j++) |
| 470 | { |
| 471 | const LockRequest &p = refLockRequestStructure[i]; |
| 472 | const LockRequest &q = refLockRequestStructure[j]; |
| 473 | bool status = isConflictRecord(p, q); |
| 474 | |
| 475 | if (status) |
| 476 | { |
| 477 | return true; |
| 478 | } |
| 479 | } |
| 480 | } |
| 481 | } |
| 482 | return false; |
| 483 | } |
| 484 | |
| 485 | // This function converts the provided uint64_t resource id's from the two |
| 486 | // lock requests subjected for comparision, and this function also compares |
| 487 | // the content by bytes mentioned by a uint32_t number. |
| 488 | |
| 489 | // If all the elements in the lock requests which are subjected for comparison |
| 490 | // are same, then the last comparision would be to check for the respective |
| 491 | // bytes in the resourceid based on the segment length. |
| 492 | |
| 493 | bool Lock::checkByte(uint64_t resourceId1, uint64_t resourceId2, |
| 494 | uint32_t position) |
| 495 | { |
| 496 | uint8_t *p = reinterpret_cast<uint8_t *>(&resourceId1); |
| 497 | uint8_t *q = reinterpret_cast<uint8_t *>(&resourceId2); |
| 498 | |
| 499 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << "Comparing bytes " << std::to_string(p[position]) << "," |
| 500 | << std::to_string(q[position]); |
| 501 | if (p[position] != q[position]) |
| 502 | { |
| 503 | return false; |
| 504 | } |
| 505 | |
| 506 | else |
| 507 | { |
| 508 | return true; |
| 509 | } |
| 510 | return true; |
| 511 | } |
| 512 | |
| 513 | bool Lock::isConflictRecord(const LockRequest refLockRecord1, |
| 514 | const LockRequest refLockRecord2) |
| 515 | { |
| 516 | // No conflict if both are read locks |
| 517 | |
| 518 | if (boost::equals(std::get<2>(refLockRecord1), "Read") && |
| 519 | boost::equals(std::get<2>(refLockRecord2), "Read")) |
| 520 | { |
| 521 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << "Both are read locks, no conflict"; |
| 522 | return false; |
| 523 | } |
| 524 | |
| 525 | else |
| 526 | { |
| 527 | uint32_t i = 0; |
| 528 | for (const auto &p : std::get<4>(refLockRecord1)) |
| 529 | { |
| 530 | |
| 531 | // return conflict when any of them is try to lock all resources |
| 532 | // under the current resource level. |
| 533 | if (boost::equals(p.first, "LockAll") || |
| 534 | boost::equals(std::get<4>(refLockRecord2)[i].first, "LockAll")) |
| 535 | { |
| 536 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG |
| 537 | << "Either of the Comparing locks are trying to lock all " |
| 538 | "resources under the current resource level"; |
| 539 | return true; |
| 540 | } |
| 541 | |
| 542 | // determine if there is a lock-all-with-same-segment-size. |
| 543 | // If the current segment sizes are the same,then we should fail. |
| 544 | |
| 545 | if ((boost::equals(p.first, "LockSame") || |
| 546 | boost::equals(std::get<4>(refLockRecord2)[i].first, |
| 547 | "LockSame")) && |
| 548 | (p.second == std::get<4>(refLockRecord2)[i].second)) |
| 549 | { |
| 550 | return true; |
| 551 | } |
| 552 | |
| 553 | // if segment lengths are not the same, it means two different locks |
| 554 | // So no conflict |
| 555 | if (p.second != std::get<4>(refLockRecord2)[i].second) |
| 556 | { |
| 557 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << "Segment lengths are not same"; |
| 558 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << "Segment 1 length : " << p.second; |
| 559 | BMCWEB_LOG_DEBUG << "Segment 2 length : " |
| 560 | << std::get<4>(refLockRecord2)[i].second; |
| 561 | return false; |
| 562 | } |
| 563 | |
| 564 | // compare segment data |
| 565 | |
| 566 | for (uint32_t i = 0; i < p.second; i++) |
| 567 | { |
| 568 | // if the segment data is different , then the locks is on a |
| 569 | // different resource So no conflict between the lock records |
| 570 | if (!(checkByte(std::get<3>(refLockRecord1), |
| 571 | std::get<3>(refLockRecord2), i))) |
| 572 | { |
| 573 | return false; |
| 574 | } |
| 575 | } |
| 576 | |
| 577 | ++i; |
| 578 | } |
| 579 | } |
| 580 | |
| 581 | return false; |
| 582 | } |
| 583 | |
| 584 | uint32_t Lock::generateTransactionId() |
| 585 | { |
| 586 | ++transactionId; |
| 587 | return transactionId; |
| 588 | } |
| 589 | |
| 590 | } // namespace ibm_mc_lock |
| 591 | } // namespace crow |