blob: 75a9fdd441c712b76cc1ea1fa609ef8cc4aacdee [file] [log] [blame]
From 5c0092070253113cf0d9c45eacc884b3ecc34d81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: jsm28 <jsm28@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 00:23:17 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Only allow e500 double in SPE_SIMD_REGNO_P registers.
rs6000_hard_regno_nregs_internal allows SPE vectors in single
registers satisfying SPE_SIMD_REGNO_P (i.e. register numbers 0 to
31). However, the corresponding test for e500 double treats all
registers as being able to store a 64-bit value, rather than just
those GPRs.
Logically this inconsistency is wrong; in addition, it causes problems
unwinding from signal handlers. linux-unwind.h uses
ARG_POINTER_REGNUM as a place to store the return address from a
signal handler, but this logic in rs6000_hard_regno_nregs_internal
results in that being considered an 8-byte register, resulting in
assertion failures.
(<https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02625.html> first
needs to be applied for unwinding to work in general on e500.) This
patch makes rs6000_hard_regno_nregs_internal handle the e500 double
case consistently with SPE vectors.
Tested with no regressions with cross to powerpc-linux-gnuspe (given
the aforementioned patch applied). Failures of signal handling
unwinding tests such as gcc.dg/cleanup-{8,9,10,11}.c are fixed by this
patch.
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_hard_regno_nregs_internal): Do
not allow e500 double in registers not satisyfing
SPE_SIMD_REGNO_P.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@216688 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Upstream-Status: Backport [gcc 5.0]
---
gcc/ChangeLog | 6 ++++++
gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: gcc-4.9.2/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
===================================================================
--- gcc-4.9.2.orig/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
+++ gcc-4.9.2/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
@@ -1703,7 +1703,7 @@ rs6000_hard_regno_nregs_internal (int re
SCmode so as to pass the value correctly in a pair of
registers. */
else if (TARGET_E500_DOUBLE && FLOAT_MODE_P (mode) && mode != SCmode
- && !DECIMAL_FLOAT_MODE_P (mode))
+ && !DECIMAL_FLOAT_MODE_P (mode) && SPE_SIMD_REGNO_P (regno))
reg_size = UNITS_PER_FP_WORD;
else