blob: 6678c105cdb9f9a5772b603e2cfd256973f7aa02 [file] [log] [blame]
From 1ed066fc6fa7d7afffe3545c4e3ea937529e6c49 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Changqing Li <changqing.li@windriver.com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 17:40:58 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] lib/transaction.c: fix file conflicts for MIPS64 N32
This patch is from:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/193
Error: Transaction check error:
file /sbin/ldconfig conflicts between attempted installs of
ldconfig-2.31+git0+71f2b249a2-r0.mips64_n32 and
lib32-ldconfig-2.31+git0+71f2b249a2-r0.mips32r2
...
This was because:
transactions_color = 001 (ELF32) & 010 (ELF64) & 100 (ELF32 N32 MIPS64)
FColor = Current file color (001) & transaction_color (111)
oFcolor = Previous file color (100) & transaction_color (111)
In handleColorConflict, it only deal with conditons "new preferred" or
"old preferred". But not deal with the situation where neither is the
preferred type. so for tri-lib system, like mips64/mips64 n32/mips(32),
"Transaction check error" occurred.
Fixed by performing a 'last-in-wins' resolution when "neither is preferred".
Upstream-Status: Submitted <https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/193>
Signed-off-by: Changqing Li <changqing.li@windriver.com>
---
lib/transaction.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/transaction.c b/lib/transaction.c
index 67b9db5..82386b8 100644
--- a/lib/transaction.c
+++ b/lib/transaction.c
@@ -391,7 +391,18 @@ static int handleColorConflict(rpmts ts,
rpmfsSetAction(ofs, ofx, FA_CREATE);
rpmfsSetAction(fs, fx, FA_SKIPCOLOR);
rConflicts = 0;
- }
+ }else {
+ /*
+ * If neither is already skipped, we skip the old one, and
+ * install the new one (last in wins).
+ */
+ if (ofs && !XFA_SKIPPING(rpmfsGetAction(ofs, ofx)) &&
+ fs && !XFA_SKIPPING(rpmfsGetAction(fs, fx))) {
+ rpmfsSetAction(ofs, ofx, FA_SKIPCOLOR);
+ rpmfsSetAction(fs, fx, FA_CREATE);
+ }
+ rConflicts = 0;
+ }
}
}
--
2.7.4