blob: 118f24e6c646d0b6b783bf4f4c14f2141e5ffd6a [file] [log] [blame]
#include <util/hei_flyweight.hpp>
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
using namespace libhei;
class Foo
{
public:
Foo() = default;
explicit Foo(int i) : iv_i(i) {}
int get() const { return iv_i; }
bool operator==(const Foo & i_r) const { return iv_i == i_r.iv_i; }
bool operator<(const Foo & i_r) const { return iv_i < i_r.iv_i; }
private:
int iv_i = 0;
};
Foo & addFoo(int i)
{
return Flyweight<Foo>::getSingleton().get(Foo { i });
}
TEST(FlyweightTest, TestSet1)
{
// Add some unique entries in a random order and keep track of where those
// enties exist in memory.
Foo * a[5];
a[1] = &(addFoo(1));
a[2] = &(addFoo(2));
a[0] = &(addFoo(0));
a[4] = &(addFoo(4));
a[3] = &(addFoo(3));
// Now add more entries and verify the 'new' entries match the same
// addresses as the previously added entries.
for (int i = 4; i >= 0; i--)
{
ASSERT_EQ(a[i], &(addFoo(i)));
}
// At this point, we have proven that duplicate entries will return
// references to the original unique entries. There is probably more we can
// do here, but this is enough to prove the Flyweight class follows the
// flyweight design pattern.
}