How to use this list: | |
Find the most specific section entry (described below) that matches where | |
your change lives and add the reviewers (R) and maintainers (M) as | |
reviewers. You can use the same method to track down who knows a particular | |
code base best. | |
Your change/query may span multiple entries; that is okay. | |
If you do not find an entry that describes your request at all, someone | |
forgot to update this list; please at least file an issue or send an email | |
to a maintainer, but preferably you should just update this document. | |
Description of section entries: | |
Section entries are structured according to the following scheme: | |
X: NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!> | |
X: ... | |
. | |
. | |
. | |
Where REPO_NAME is the name of the repository within the OpenBMC GitHub | |
organization; FILE_PATH is a file path within the repository, possibly with | |
wildcards; X is a tag of one of the following types: | |
M: Denotes maintainer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!>; | |
if omitted from an entry, assume one of the maintainers from the | |
MAINTAINERS entry. | |
R: Denotes reviewer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!>; | |
these people are to be added as reviewers for a change matching the repo | |
path. | |
F: Denotes forked from an external repository; has fields URL. | |
Line comments are to be denoted "# SOME COMMENT" (typical shell style | |
comment); it is important to follow the correct syntax and semantics as we | |
may want to use automated tools with this file in the future. | |
A change cannot be added to an OpenBMC repository without a MAINTAINER's | |
approval; thus, a MAINTAINER should always be listed as a reviewer. | |
START OF MAINTAINERS LIST | |
------------------------- | |
M: Will Liang <will.liang@quantatw.com> <w_liang!> | |
M: George Hung <george.hung@quantatw.com> <ghung!> |