| .. SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-2.5 |
| |
| ========= |
| Execution |
| ========= |
| |
| | |
| |
| The primary purpose for running BitBake is to produce some kind of |
| output such as a single installable package, a kernel, a software |
| development kit, or even a full, board-specific bootable Linux image, |
| complete with bootloader, kernel, and root filesystem. Of course, you |
| can execute the ``bitbake`` command with options that cause it to |
| execute single tasks, compile single recipe files, capture or clear |
| data, or simply return information about the execution environment. |
| |
| This chapter describes BitBake's execution process from start to finish |
| when you use it to create an image. The execution process is launched |
| using the following command form: :: |
| |
| $ bitbake target |
| |
| For information on |
| the BitBake command and its options, see ":ref:`The BitBake Command |
| <bitbake-user-manual-command>`" section. |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| Prior to executing BitBake, you should take advantage of available |
| parallel thread execution on your build host by setting the |
| :term:`BB_NUMBER_THREADS` variable in |
| your project's ``local.conf`` configuration file. |
| |
| A common method to determine this value for your build host is to run |
| the following: :: |
| |
| $ grep processor /proc/cpuinfo |
| |
| This command returns |
| the number of processors, which takes into account hyper-threading. |
| Thus, a quad-core build host with hyper-threading most likely shows |
| eight processors, which is the value you would then assign to |
| ``BB_NUMBER_THREADS``. |
| |
| A possibly simpler solution is that some Linux distributions (e.g. |
| Debian and Ubuntu) provide the ``ncpus`` command. |
| |
| Parsing the Base Configuration Metadata |
| ======================================= |
| |
| The first thing BitBake does is parse base configuration metadata. Base |
| configuration metadata consists of your project's ``bblayers.conf`` file |
| to determine what layers BitBake needs to recognize, all necessary |
| ``layer.conf`` files (one from each layer), and ``bitbake.conf``. The |
| data itself is of various types: |
| |
| - **Recipes:** Details about particular pieces of software. |
| |
| - **Class Data:** An abstraction of common build information (e.g. how to |
| build a Linux kernel). |
| |
| - **Configuration Data:** Machine-specific settings, policy decisions, |
| and so forth. Configuration data acts as the glue to bind everything |
| together. |
| |
| The ``layer.conf`` files are used to construct key variables such as |
| :term:`BBPATH` and :term:`BBFILES`. |
| ``BBPATH`` is used to search for configuration and class files under the |
| ``conf`` and ``classes`` directories, respectively. ``BBFILES`` is used |
| to locate both recipe and recipe append files (``.bb`` and |
| ``.bbappend``). If there is no ``bblayers.conf`` file, it is assumed the |
| user has set the ``BBPATH`` and ``BBFILES`` directly in the environment. |
| |
| Next, the ``bitbake.conf`` file is located using the ``BBPATH`` variable |
| that was just constructed. The ``bitbake.conf`` file may also include |
| other configuration files using the ``include`` or ``require`` |
| directives. |
| |
| Prior to parsing configuration files, BitBake looks at certain |
| variables, including: |
| |
| - :term:`BB_ENV_WHITELIST` |
| - :term:`BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE` |
| - :term:`BB_PRESERVE_ENV` |
| - :term:`BB_ORIGENV` |
| - :term:`BITBAKE_UI` |
| |
| The first four variables in this list relate to how BitBake treats shell |
| environment variables during task execution. By default, BitBake cleans |
| the environment variables and provides tight control over the shell |
| execution environment. However, through the use of these first four |
| variables, you can apply your control regarding the environment |
| variables allowed to be used by BitBake in the shell during execution of |
| tasks. See the |
| ":ref:`bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manual-metadata:Passing Information Into the Build Task Environment`" |
| section and the information about these variables in the variable |
| glossary for more information on how they work and on how to use them. |
| |
| The base configuration metadata is global and therefore affects all |
| recipes and tasks that are executed. |
| |
| BitBake first searches the current working directory for an optional |
| ``conf/bblayers.conf`` configuration file. This file is expected to |
| contain a :term:`BBLAYERS` variable that is a |
| space-delimited list of 'layer' directories. Recall that if BitBake |
| cannot find a ``bblayers.conf`` file, then it is assumed the user has |
| set the ``BBPATH`` and ``BBFILES`` variables directly in the |
| environment. |
| |
| For each directory (layer) in this list, a ``conf/layer.conf`` file is |
| located and parsed with the :term:`LAYERDIR` variable |
| being set to the directory where the layer was found. The idea is these |
| files automatically set up :term:`BBPATH` and other |
| variables correctly for a given build directory. |
| |
| BitBake then expects to find the ``conf/bitbake.conf`` file somewhere in |
| the user-specified ``BBPATH``. That configuration file generally has |
| include directives to pull in any other metadata such as files specific |
| to the architecture, the machine, the local environment, and so forth. |
| |
| Only variable definitions and include directives are allowed in BitBake |
| ``.conf`` files. Some variables directly influence BitBake's behavior. |
| These variables might have been set from the environment depending on |
| the environment variables previously mentioned or set in the |
| configuration files. The ":ref:`bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manual-ref-variables:Variables Glossary`" |
| chapter presents a full list of |
| variables. |
| |
| After parsing configuration files, BitBake uses its rudimentary |
| inheritance mechanism, which is through class files, to inherit some |
| standard classes. BitBake parses a class when the inherit directive |
| responsible for getting that class is encountered. |
| |
| The ``base.bbclass`` file is always included. Other classes that are |
| specified in the configuration using the |
| :term:`INHERIT` variable are also included. BitBake |
| searches for class files in a ``classes`` subdirectory under the paths |
| in ``BBPATH`` in the same way as configuration files. |
| |
| A good way to get an idea of the configuration files and the class files |
| used in your execution environment is to run the following BitBake |
| command: :: |
| |
| $ bitbake -e > mybb.log |
| |
| Examining the top of the ``mybb.log`` |
| shows you the many configuration files and class files used in your |
| execution environment. |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| You need to be aware of how BitBake parses curly braces. If a recipe |
| uses a closing curly brace within the function and the character has |
| no leading spaces, BitBake produces a parsing error. If you use a |
| pair of curly braces in a shell function, the closing curly brace |
| must not be located at the start of the line without leading spaces. |
| |
| Here is an example that causes BitBake to produce a parsing error: :: |
| |
| fakeroot create_shar() { |
| cat << "EOF" > ${SDK_DEPLOY}/${TOOLCHAIN_OUTPUTNAME}.sh |
| usage() |
| { |
| echo "test" |
| ###### The following "}" at the start of the line causes a parsing error ###### |
| } |
| EOF |
| } |
| |
| Writing the recipe this way avoids the error: |
| fakeroot create_shar() { |
| cat << "EOF" > ${SDK_DEPLOY}/${TOOLCHAIN_OUTPUTNAME}.sh |
| usage() |
| { |
| echo "test" |
| ###### The following "}" with a leading space at the start of the line avoids the error ###### |
| } |
| EOF |
| } |
| |
| Locating and Parsing Recipes |
| ============================ |
| |
| During the configuration phase, BitBake will have set |
| :term:`BBFILES`. BitBake now uses it to construct a |
| list of recipes to parse, along with any append files (``.bbappend``) to |
| apply. ``BBFILES`` is a space-separated list of available files and |
| supports wildcards. An example would be: :: |
| |
| BBFILES = "/path/to/bbfiles/*.bb /path/to/appends/*.bbappend" |
| |
| BitBake parses each |
| recipe and append file located with ``BBFILES`` and stores the values of |
| various variables into the datastore. |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| Append files are applied in the order they are encountered in BBFILES. |
| |
| For each file, a fresh copy of the base configuration is made, then the |
| recipe is parsed line by line. Any inherit statements cause BitBake to |
| find and then parse class files (``.bbclass``) using |
| :term:`BBPATH` as the search path. Finally, BitBake |
| parses in order any append files found in ``BBFILES``. |
| |
| One common convention is to use the recipe filename to define pieces of |
| metadata. For example, in ``bitbake.conf`` the recipe name and version |
| are used to set the variables :term:`PN` and |
| :term:`PV`: :: |
| |
| PN = "${@bb.parse.BBHandler.vars_from_file(d.getVar('FILE', False),d)[0] or 'defaultpkgname'}" |
| PV = "${@bb.parse.BBHandler.vars_from_file(d.getVar('FILE', False),d)[1] or '1.0'}" |
| |
| In this example, a recipe called "something_1.2.3.bb" would set |
| ``PN`` to "something" and ``PV`` to "1.2.3". |
| |
| By the time parsing is complete for a recipe, BitBake has a list of |
| tasks that the recipe defines and a set of data consisting of keys and |
| values as well as dependency information about the tasks. |
| |
| BitBake does not need all of this information. It only needs a small |
| subset of the information to make decisions about the recipe. |
| Consequently, BitBake caches the values in which it is interested and |
| does not store the rest of the information. Experience has shown it is |
| faster to re-parse the metadata than to try and write it out to the disk |
| and then reload it. |
| |
| Where possible, subsequent BitBake commands reuse this cache of recipe |
| information. The validity of this cache is determined by first computing |
| a checksum of the base configuration data (see |
| :term:`BB_HASHCONFIG_WHITELIST`) and |
| then checking if the checksum matches. If that checksum matches what is |
| in the cache and the recipe and class files have not changed, BitBake is |
| able to use the cache. BitBake then reloads the cached information about |
| the recipe instead of reparsing it from scratch. |
| |
| Recipe file collections exist to allow the user to have multiple |
| repositories of ``.bb`` files that contain the same exact package. For |
| example, one could easily use them to make one's own local copy of an |
| upstream repository, but with custom modifications that one does not |
| want upstream. Here is an example: :: |
| |
| BBFILES = "/stuff/openembedded/*/*.bb /stuff/openembedded.modified/*/*.bb" |
| BBFILE_COLLECTIONS = "upstream local" |
| BBFILE_PATTERN_upstream = "^/stuff/openembedded/" |
| BBFILE_PATTERN_local = "^/stuff/openembedded.modified/" |
| BBFILE_PRIORITY_upstream = "5" BBFILE_PRIORITY_local = "10" |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| The layers mechanism is now the preferred method of collecting code. |
| While the collections code remains, its main use is to set layer |
| priorities and to deal with overlap (conflicts) between layers. |
| |
| .. _bb-bitbake-providers: |
| |
| Providers |
| ========= |
| |
| Assuming BitBake has been instructed to execute a target and that all |
| the recipe files have been parsed, BitBake starts to figure out how to |
| build the target. BitBake looks through the ``PROVIDES`` list for each |
| of the recipes. A ``PROVIDES`` list is the list of names by which the |
| recipe can be known. Each recipe's ``PROVIDES`` list is created |
| implicitly through the recipe's :term:`PN` variable and |
| explicitly through the recipe's :term:`PROVIDES` |
| variable, which is optional. |
| |
| When a recipe uses ``PROVIDES``, that recipe's functionality can be |
| found under an alternative name or names other than the implicit ``PN`` |
| name. As an example, suppose a recipe named ``keyboard_1.0.bb`` |
| contained the following: :: |
| |
| PROVIDES += "fullkeyboard" |
| |
| The ``PROVIDES`` |
| list for this recipe becomes "keyboard", which is implicit, and |
| "fullkeyboard", which is explicit. Consequently, the functionality found |
| in ``keyboard_1.0.bb`` can be found under two different names. |
| |
| .. _bb-bitbake-preferences: |
| |
| Preferences |
| =========== |
| |
| The ``PROVIDES`` list is only part of the solution for figuring out a |
| target's recipes. Because targets might have multiple providers, BitBake |
| needs to prioritize providers by determining provider preferences. |
| |
| A common example in which a target has multiple providers is |
| "virtual/kernel", which is on the ``PROVIDES`` list for each kernel |
| recipe. Each machine often selects the best kernel provider by using a |
| line similar to the following in the machine configuration file: :: |
| |
| PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "linux-yocto" |
| |
| The default :term:`PREFERRED_PROVIDER` is the provider |
| with the same name as the target. BitBake iterates through each target |
| it needs to build and resolves them and their dependencies using this |
| process. |
| |
| Understanding how providers are chosen is made complicated by the fact |
| that multiple versions might exist for a given provider. BitBake |
| defaults to the highest version of a provider. Version comparisons are |
| made using the same method as Debian. You can use the |
| :term:`PREFERRED_VERSION` variable to |
| specify a particular version. You can influence the order by using the |
| :term:`DEFAULT_PREFERENCE` variable. |
| |
| By default, files have a preference of "0". Setting |
| ``DEFAULT_PREFERENCE`` to "-1" makes the recipe unlikely to be used |
| unless it is explicitly referenced. Setting ``DEFAULT_PREFERENCE`` to |
| "1" makes it likely the recipe is used. ``PREFERRED_VERSION`` overrides |
| any ``DEFAULT_PREFERENCE`` setting. ``DEFAULT_PREFERENCE`` is often used |
| to mark newer and more experimental recipe versions until they have |
| undergone sufficient testing to be considered stable. |
| |
| When there are multiple “versions” of a given recipe, BitBake defaults |
| to selecting the most recent version, unless otherwise specified. If the |
| recipe in question has a |
| :term:`DEFAULT_PREFERENCE` set lower than |
| the other recipes (default is 0), then it will not be selected. This |
| allows the person or persons maintaining the repository of recipe files |
| to specify their preference for the default selected version. |
| Additionally, the user can specify their preferred version. |
| |
| If the first recipe is named ``a_1.1.bb``, then the |
| :term:`PN` variable will be set to “a”, and the |
| :term:`PV` variable will be set to 1.1. |
| |
| Thus, if a recipe named ``a_1.2.bb`` exists, BitBake will choose 1.2 by |
| default. However, if you define the following variable in a ``.conf`` |
| file that BitBake parses, you can change that preference: :: |
| |
| PREFERRED_VERSION_a = "1.1" |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| It is common for a recipe to provide two versions -- a stable, |
| numbered (and preferred) version, and a version that is automatically |
| checked out from a source code repository that is considered more |
| "bleeding edge" but can be selected only explicitly. |
| |
| For example, in the OpenEmbedded codebase, there is a standard, |
| versioned recipe file for BusyBox, ``busybox_1.22.1.bb``, but there |
| is also a Git-based version, ``busybox_git.bb``, which explicitly |
| contains the line :: |
| |
| DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1" |
| |
| to ensure that the |
| numbered, stable version is always preferred unless the developer |
| selects otherwise. |
| |
| .. _bb-bitbake-dependencies: |
| |
| Dependencies |
| ============ |
| |
| Each target BitBake builds consists of multiple tasks such as ``fetch``, |
| ``unpack``, ``patch``, ``configure``, and ``compile``. For best |
| performance on multi-core systems, BitBake considers each task as an |
| independent entity with its own set of dependencies. |
| |
| Dependencies are defined through several variables. You can find |
| information about variables BitBake uses in the |
| :doc:`bitbake-user-manual-ref-variables` near the end of this manual. At a |
| basic level, it is sufficient to know that BitBake uses the |
| :term:`DEPENDS` and |
| :term:`RDEPENDS` variables when calculating |
| dependencies. |
| |
| For more information on how BitBake handles dependencies, see the |
| :ref:`bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manual-metadata:Dependencies` |
| section. |
| |
| .. _ref-bitbake-tasklist: |
| |
| The Task List |
| ============= |
| |
| Based on the generated list of providers and the dependency information, |
| BitBake can now calculate exactly what tasks it needs to run and in what |
| order it needs to run them. The |
| :ref:`bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manual-execution:executing tasks` |
| section has more information on how BitBake chooses which task to |
| execute next. |
| |
| The build now starts with BitBake forking off threads up to the limit |
| set in the :term:`BB_NUMBER_THREADS` |
| variable. BitBake continues to fork threads as long as there are tasks |
| ready to run, those tasks have all their dependencies met, and the |
| thread threshold has not been exceeded. |
| |
| It is worth noting that you can greatly speed up the build time by |
| properly setting the ``BB_NUMBER_THREADS`` variable. |
| |
| As each task completes, a timestamp is written to the directory |
| specified by the :term:`STAMP` variable. On subsequent |
| runs, BitBake looks in the build directory within ``tmp/stamps`` and |
| does not rerun tasks that are already completed unless a timestamp is |
| found to be invalid. Currently, invalid timestamps are only considered |
| on a per recipe file basis. So, for example, if the configure stamp has |
| a timestamp greater than the compile timestamp for a given target, then |
| the compile task would rerun. Running the compile task again, however, |
| has no effect on other providers that depend on that target. |
| |
| The exact format of the stamps is partly configurable. In modern |
| versions of BitBake, a hash is appended to the stamp so that if the |
| configuration changes, the stamp becomes invalid and the task is |
| automatically rerun. This hash, or signature used, is governed by the |
| signature policy that is configured (see the |
| :ref:`bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manual-execution:checksums (signatures)` |
| section for information). It is also |
| possible to append extra metadata to the stamp using the |
| ``[stamp-extra-info]`` task flag. For example, OpenEmbedded uses this |
| flag to make some tasks machine-specific. |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| Some tasks are marked as "nostamp" tasks. No timestamp file is |
| created when these tasks are run. Consequently, "nostamp" tasks are |
| always rerun. |
| |
| For more information on tasks, see the |
| :ref:`bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manual-metadata:tasks` section. |
| |
| Executing Tasks |
| =============== |
| |
| Tasks can be either a shell task or a Python task. For shell tasks, |
| BitBake writes a shell script to |
| ``${``\ :term:`T`\ ``}/run.do_taskname.pid`` and then |
| executes the script. The generated shell script contains all the |
| exported variables, and the shell functions with all variables expanded. |
| Output from the shell script goes to the file |
| ``${T}/log.do_taskname.pid``. Looking at the expanded shell functions in |
| the run file and the output in the log files is a useful debugging |
| technique. |
| |
| For Python tasks, BitBake executes the task internally and logs |
| information to the controlling terminal. Future versions of BitBake will |
| write the functions to files similar to the way shell tasks are handled. |
| Logging will be handled in a way similar to shell tasks as well. |
| |
| The order in which BitBake runs the tasks is controlled by its task |
| scheduler. It is possible to configure the scheduler and define custom |
| implementations for specific use cases. For more information, see these |
| variables that control the behavior: |
| |
| - :term:`BB_SCHEDULER` |
| |
| - :term:`BB_SCHEDULERS` |
| |
| It is possible to have functions run before and after a task's main |
| function. This is done using the ``[prefuncs]`` and ``[postfuncs]`` |
| flags of the task that lists the functions to run. |
| |
| .. _checksums: |
| |
| Checksums (Signatures) |
| ====================== |
| |
| A checksum is a unique signature of a task's inputs. The signature of a |
| task can be used to determine if a task needs to be run. Because it is a |
| change in a task's inputs that triggers running the task, BitBake needs |
| to detect all the inputs to a given task. For shell tasks, this turns |
| out to be fairly easy because BitBake generates a "run" shell script for |
| each task and it is possible to create a checksum that gives you a good |
| idea of when the task's data changes. |
| |
| To complicate the problem, some things should not be included in the |
| checksum. First, there is the actual specific build path of a given task |
| - the working directory. It does not matter if the working directory |
| changes because it should not affect the output for target packages. The |
| simplistic approach for excluding the working directory is to set it to |
| some fixed value and create the checksum for the "run" script. BitBake |
| goes one step better and uses the |
| :term:`BB_HASHBASE_WHITELIST` variable |
| to define a list of variables that should never be included when |
| generating the signatures. |
| |
| Another problem results from the "run" scripts containing functions that |
| might or might not get called. The incremental build solution contains |
| code that figures out dependencies between shell functions. This code is |
| used to prune the "run" scripts down to the minimum set, thereby |
| alleviating this problem and making the "run" scripts much more readable |
| as a bonus. |
| |
| So far we have solutions for shell scripts. What about Python tasks? The |
| same approach applies even though these tasks are more difficult. The |
| process needs to figure out what variables a Python function accesses |
| and what functions it calls. Again, the incremental build solution |
| contains code that first figures out the variable and function |
| dependencies, and then creates a checksum for the data used as the input |
| to the task. |
| |
| Like the working directory case, situations exist where dependencies |
| should be ignored. For these cases, you can instruct the build process |
| to ignore a dependency by using a line like the following: :: |
| |
| PACKAGE_ARCHS[vardepsexclude] = "MACHINE" |
| |
| This example ensures that the |
| ``PACKAGE_ARCHS`` variable does not depend on the value of ``MACHINE``, |
| even if it does reference it. |
| |
| Equally, there are cases where we need to add dependencies BitBake is |
| not able to find. You can accomplish this by using a line like the |
| following: :: |
| |
| PACKAGE_ARCHS[vardeps] = "MACHINE" |
| |
| This example explicitly |
| adds the ``MACHINE`` variable as a dependency for ``PACKAGE_ARCHS``. |
| |
| Consider a case with in-line Python, for example, where BitBake is not |
| able to figure out dependencies. When running in debug mode (i.e. using |
| ``-DDD``), BitBake produces output when it discovers something for which |
| it cannot figure out dependencies. |
| |
| Thus far, this section has limited discussion to the direct inputs into |
| a task. Information based on direct inputs is referred to as the |
| "basehash" in the code. However, there is still the question of a task's |
| indirect inputs - the things that were already built and present in the |
| build directory. The checksum (or signature) for a particular task needs |
| to add the hashes of all the tasks on which the particular task depends. |
| Choosing which dependencies to add is a policy decision. However, the |
| effect is to generate a master checksum that combines the basehash and |
| the hashes of the task's dependencies. |
| |
| At the code level, there are a variety of ways both the basehash and the |
| dependent task hashes can be influenced. Within the BitBake |
| configuration file, we can give BitBake some extra information to help |
| it construct the basehash. The following statement effectively results |
| in a list of global variable dependency excludes - variables never |
| included in any checksum. This example uses variables from OpenEmbedded |
| to help illustrate the concept: :: |
| |
| BB_HASHBASE_WHITELIST ?= "TMPDIR FILE PATH PWD BB_TASKHASH BBPATH DL_DIR \ |
| SSTATE_DIR THISDIR FILESEXTRAPATHS FILE_DIRNAME HOME LOGNAME SHELL \ |
| USER FILESPATH STAGING_DIR_HOST STAGING_DIR_TARGET COREBASE PRSERV_HOST \ |
| PRSERV_DUMPDIR PRSERV_DUMPFILE PRSERV_LOCKDOWN PARALLEL_MAKE \ |
| CCACHE_DIR EXTERNAL_TOOLCHAIN CCACHE CCACHE_DISABLE LICENSE_PATH SDKPKGSUFFIX" |
| |
| The previous example excludes the work directory, which is part of |
| ``TMPDIR``. |
| |
| The rules for deciding which hashes of dependent tasks to include |
| through dependency chains are more complex and are generally |
| accomplished with a Python function. The code in |
| ``meta/lib/oe/sstatesig.py`` shows two examples of this and also |
| illustrates how you can insert your own policy into the system if so |
| desired. This file defines the two basic signature generators |
| OpenEmbedded-Core uses: "OEBasic" and "OEBasicHash". By default, there |
| is a dummy "noop" signature handler enabled in BitBake. This means that |
| behavior is unchanged from previous versions. ``OE-Core`` uses the |
| "OEBasicHash" signature handler by default through this setting in the |
| ``bitbake.conf`` file: :: |
| |
| BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER ?= "OEBasicHash" |
| |
| The "OEBasicHash" ``BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER`` is the same as the "OEBasic" |
| version but adds the task hash to the stamp files. This results in any |
| metadata change that changes the task hash, automatically causing the |
| task to be run again. This removes the need to bump |
| :term:`PR` values, and changes to metadata automatically |
| ripple across the build. |
| |
| It is also worth noting that the end result of these signature |
| generators is to make some dependency and hash information available to |
| the build. This information includes: |
| |
| - ``BB_BASEHASH_task-``\ *taskname*: The base hashes for each task in the |
| recipe. |
| |
| - ``BB_BASEHASH_``\ *filename:taskname*: The base hashes for each |
| dependent task. |
| |
| - ``BBHASHDEPS_``\ *filename:taskname*: The task dependencies for |
| each task. |
| |
| - ``BB_TASKHASH``: The hash of the currently running task. |
| |
| It is worth noting that BitBake's "-S" option lets you debug BitBake's |
| processing of signatures. The options passed to -S allow different |
| debugging modes to be used, either using BitBake's own debug functions |
| or possibly those defined in the metadata/signature handler itself. The |
| simplest parameter to pass is "none", which causes a set of signature |
| information to be written out into ``STAMPS_DIR`` corresponding to the |
| targets specified. The other currently available parameter is |
| "printdiff", which causes BitBake to try to establish the closest |
| signature match it can (e.g. in the sstate cache) and then run |
| ``bitbake-diffsigs`` over the matches to determine the stamps and delta |
| where these two stamp trees diverge. |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| It is likely that future versions of BitBake will provide other |
| signature handlers triggered through additional "-S" parameters. |
| |
| You can find more information on checksum metadata in the |
| :ref:`bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manual-metadata:task checksums and setscene` |
| section. |
| |
| Setscene |
| ======== |
| |
| The setscene process enables BitBake to handle "pre-built" artifacts. |
| The ability to handle and reuse these artifacts allows BitBake the |
| luxury of not having to build something from scratch every time. |
| Instead, BitBake can use, when possible, existing build artifacts. |
| |
| BitBake needs to have reliable data indicating whether or not an |
| artifact is compatible. Signatures, described in the previous section, |
| provide an ideal way of representing whether an artifact is compatible. |
| If a signature is the same, an object can be reused. |
| |
| If an object can be reused, the problem then becomes how to replace a |
| given task or set of tasks with the pre-built artifact. BitBake solves |
| the problem with the "setscene" process. |
| |
| When BitBake is asked to build a given target, before building anything, |
| it first asks whether cached information is available for any of the |
| targets it's building, or any of the intermediate targets. If cached |
| information is available, BitBake uses this information instead of |
| running the main tasks. |
| |
| BitBake first calls the function defined by the |
| :term:`BB_HASHCHECK_FUNCTION` variable |
| with a list of tasks and corresponding hashes it wants to build. This |
| function is designed to be fast and returns a list of the tasks for |
| which it believes in can obtain artifacts. |
| |
| Next, for each of the tasks that were returned as possibilities, BitBake |
| executes a setscene version of the task that the possible artifact |
| covers. Setscene versions of a task have the string "_setscene" appended |
| to the task name. So, for example, the task with the name ``xxx`` has a |
| setscene task named ``xxx_setscene``. The setscene version of the task |
| executes and provides the necessary artifacts returning either success |
| or failure. |
| |
| As previously mentioned, an artifact can cover more than one task. For |
| example, it is pointless to obtain a compiler if you already have the |
| compiled binary. To handle this, BitBake calls the |
| :term:`BB_SETSCENE_DEPVALID` function for |
| each successful setscene task to know whether or not it needs to obtain |
| the dependencies of that task. |
| |
| Finally, after all the setscene tasks have executed, BitBake calls the |
| function listed in |
| :term:`BB_SETSCENE_VERIFY_FUNCTION2` |
| with the list of tasks BitBake thinks has been "covered". The metadata |
| can then ensure that this list is correct and can inform BitBake that it |
| wants specific tasks to be run regardless of the setscene result. |
| |
| You can find more information on setscene metadata in the |
| :ref:`bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manual-metadata:task checksums and setscene` |
| section. |
| |
| Logging |
| ======= |
| |
| In addition to the standard command line option to control how verbose |
| builds are when execute, bitbake also supports user defined |
| configuration of the `Python |
| logging <https://docs.python.org/3/library/logging.html>`__ facilities |
| through the :term:`BB_LOGCONFIG` variable. This |
| variable defines a json or yaml `logging |
| configuration <https://docs.python.org/3/library/logging.config.html>`__ |
| that will be intelligently merged into the default configuration. The |
| logging configuration is merged using the following rules: |
| |
| - The user defined configuration will completely replace the default |
| configuration if top level key ``bitbake_merge`` is set to the value |
| ``False``. In this case, all other rules are ignored. |
| |
| - The user configuration must have a top level ``version`` which must |
| match the value of the default configuration. |
| |
| - Any keys defined in the ``handlers``, ``formatters``, or ``filters``, |
| will be merged into the same section in the default configuration, |
| with the user specified keys taking replacing a default one if there |
| is a conflict. In practice, this means that if both the default |
| configuration and user configuration specify a handler named |
| ``myhandler``, the user defined one will replace the default. To |
| prevent the user from inadvertently replacing a default handler, |
| formatter, or filter, all of the default ones are named with a prefix |
| of "``BitBake.``" |
| |
| - If a logger is defined by the user with the key ``bitbake_merge`` set |
| to ``False``, that logger will be completely replaced by user |
| configuration. In this case, no other rules will apply to that |
| logger. |
| |
| - All user defined ``filter`` and ``handlers`` properties for a given |
| logger will be merged with corresponding properties from the default |
| logger. For example, if the user configuration adds a filter called |
| ``myFilter`` to the ``BitBake.SigGen``, and the default configuration |
| adds a filter called ``BitBake.defaultFilter``, both filters will be |
| applied to the logger |
| |
| As an example, consider the following user logging configuration file |
| which logs all Hash Equivalence related messages of VERBOSE or higher to |
| a file called ``hashequiv.log`` :: |
| |
| { |
| "version": 1, |
| "handlers": { |
| "autobuilderlog": { |
| "class": "logging.FileHandler", |
| "formatter": "logfileFormatter", |
| "level": "DEBUG", |
| "filename": "hashequiv.log", |
| "mode": "w" |
| } |
| }, |
| "formatters": { |
| "logfileFormatter": { |
| "format": "%(name)s: %(levelname)s: %(message)s" |
| } |
| }, |
| "loggers": { |
| "BitBake.SigGen.HashEquiv": { |
| "level": "VERBOSE", |
| "handlers": ["autobuilderlog"] |
| }, |
| "BitBake.RunQueue.HashEquiv": { |
| "level": "VERBOSE", |
| "handlers": ["autobuilderlog"] |
| } |
| } |
| } |