poky/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/files/0011-Do-not-require-that-ELF-binaries-are-executable-to-b.patch

From 5141d50d7b3d3c209a22c53deedb4ceef014401d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Kjellerstedt <pkj@axis.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 10:21:08 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 09/15] Do not require that ELF binaries are executable to be
 identifiable

There is nothing that requires, e.g., a DSO to be executable, but it
is still an ELF binary and should be identified as such.

Upstream probably expects all ELF binaries to be marked as executable,
but rather than imposing such a limitation for OE, allow any file to
be identified as an ELF binary regardless of whether it is executable
or not.

Upstream-Status: Inappropriate
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>

---
 fileattrs/elf.attr | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fileattrs/elf.attr b/fileattrs/elf.attr
index 5805dd0ee..3516f309d 100644
--- a/fileattrs/elf.attr
+++ b/fileattrs/elf.attr
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
 %__elf_provides		%{_rpmconfigdir}/elfdeps --provides %{?__filter_GLIBC_PRIVATE:--filter-private}
 %__elf_requires		%{_rpmconfigdir}/elfdeps --requires %{?__filter_GLIBC_PRIVATE:--filter-private}
 %__elf_magic		^(setuid,? )?(setgid,? )?(sticky )?ELF (32|64)-bit.*$
-%__elf_flags		exeonly
-- 
2.14.2