blob: 8bc47a430ced4ac1dfcab43bdfe3518d6e1b7511 [file] [log] [blame]
Brad Bishop26bdd442019-08-16 17:08:17 -04001From bcbfd9f69d858306a080aa7213e96ca6eca66106 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
2From: Mahesh Bodapati <mbodapat@xilinx.com>
3Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 12:08:39 +0530
4Subject: [PATCH 58/61] [Patch,Microblaze] : We will check the possibility of
5 peephole2 optimization,if we can then we will fix the compiler issue.
6
7---
8 gcc/config/microblaze/microblaze.md | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
9 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
10
11diff --git a/gcc/config/microblaze/microblaze.md b/gcc/config/microblaze/microblaze.md
12index 88aee9e..8bd175f 100644
13--- a/gcc/config/microblaze/microblaze.md
14+++ b/gcc/config/microblaze/microblaze.md
15@@ -880,31 +880,44 @@
16 (set_attr "mode" "SI")
17 (set_attr "length" "4")])
18
19-(define_peephole2
20- [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand")
21- (fix:SI (match_operand:SF 1 "register_operand")))
22- (set (pc)
23- (if_then_else (match_operator 2 "ordered_comparison_operator"
24- [(match_operand:SI 3 "register_operand")
25- (match_operand:SI 4 "arith_operand")])
26- (label_ref (match_operand 5))
27- (pc)))]
28- "TARGET_HARD_FLOAT && !TARGET_MB_64"
29- [(set (match_dup 1) (match_dup 3))]
30-
31- {
32- rtx condition;
33- rtx cmp_op0 = operands[3];
34- rtx cmp_op1 = operands[4];
35- rtx comp_reg = gen_rtx_REG (SImode, MB_ABI_ASM_TEMP_REGNUM);
36-
37- emit_insn (gen_cstoresf4 (comp_reg, operands[2],
38- gen_rtx_REG (SFmode, REGNO (cmp_op0)),
39- gen_rtx_REG (SFmode, REGNO (cmp_op1))));
40- condition = gen_rtx_NE (SImode, comp_reg, const0_rtx);
41- emit_jump_insn (gen_condjump (condition, operands[5]));
42- }
43-)
44+;; peephole2 optimization will be done only if fint and if-then-else
45+;; are dependent.added condition for the same.
46+;; if they are dependent then gcc is giving "flow control insn inside a basic block"
47+;; testcase:
48+;; volatile float vec = 1.0;
49+;; volatile int ci = 2;
50+;; register int cj = (int)(vec);
51+;;// ci=cj;
52+;;// if (ci <0) {
53+;; if (cj < 0) {
54+;; ci = 0;
55+;; }
56+;; commenting for now.we will check the possibility of this optimization later
57+
58+;;(define_peephole2
59+;; [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand")
60+;; (fix:SI (match_operand:SF 1 "register_operand")))
61+;; (set (pc)
62+;; (if_then_else (match_operator 2 "ordered_comparison_operator"
63+;; [(match_operand:SI 3 "register_operand")
64+;; (match_operand:SI 4 "arith_operand")])
65+;; (label_ref (match_operand 5))
66+;; (pc)))]
67+;; "TARGET_HARD_FLOAT && !TARGET_MB_64 && ((REGNO (operands[0])) == (REGNO (operands[3])))"
68+;; [(set (match_dup 1) (match_dup 3))]
69+;; {
70+;; rtx condition;
71+;; rtx cmp_op0 = operands[3];
72+;; rtx cmp_op1 = operands[4];
73+;; rtx comp_reg = gen_rtx_REG (SImode, MB_ABI_ASM_TEMP_REGNUM);
74+;;
75+;; emit_insn (gen_cstoresf4 (comp_reg, operands[2],
76+;; gen_rtx_REG (SFmode, REGNO (cmp_op0)),
77+;; gen_rtx_REG (SFmode, REGNO (cmp_op1))));
78+;; condition = gen_rtx_NE (SImode, comp_reg, const0_rtx);
79+;; emit_jump_insn (gen_condjump (condition, operands[5]));
80+;; }
81+;;)
82
83 ;;----------------------------------------------------------------
84 ;; Negation and one's complement
85--
862.7.4
87