Andrew Geissler | c9f7865 | 2020-09-18 14:11:35 -0500 | [diff] [blame^] | 1 | .. SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-2.0-UK |
| 2 | |
| 3 | *********************************** |
| 4 | Project Testing and Release Process |
| 5 | *********************************** |
| 6 | |
| 7 | .. _test-daily-devel: |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Day to Day Development |
| 10 | ====================== |
| 11 | |
| 12 | This section details how the project tests changes, through automation |
| 13 | on the Autobuilder or with the assistance of QA teams, through to making |
| 14 | releases. |
| 15 | |
| 16 | The project aims to test changes against our test matrix before those |
| 17 | changes are merged into the master branch. As such, changes are queued |
| 18 | up in batches either in the ``master-next`` branch in the main trees, or |
| 19 | in user trees such as ``ross/mut`` in ``poky-contrib`` (Ross Burton |
| 20 | helps review and test patches and this is his testing tree). |
| 21 | |
| 22 | We have two broad categories of test builds, including "full" and |
| 23 | "quick". On the Autobuilder, these can be seen as "a-quick" and |
| 24 | "a-full", simply for ease of sorting in the UI. Use our Autobuilder |
| 25 | console view to see where me manage most test-related items, available |
| 26 | at: :yocto_ab:`/typhoon/#/console`. |
| 27 | |
| 28 | Builds are triggered manually when the test branches are ready. The |
| 29 | builds are monitored by the SWAT team. For additional information, see |
| 30 | :yocto_wiki:`/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team`. |
| 31 | If successful, the changes would usually be merged to the ``master`` |
| 32 | branch. If not successful, someone would respond to the changes on the |
| 33 | mailing list explaining that there was a failure in testing. The choice |
| 34 | of quick or full would depend on the type of changes and the speed with |
| 35 | which the result was required. |
| 36 | |
| 37 | The Autobuilder does build the ``master`` branch once daily for several |
| 38 | reasons, in particular, to ensure the current ``master`` branch does |
| 39 | build, but also to keep ``yocto-testresults`` |
| 40 | (:yocto_git:`/cgit.cgi/yocto-testresults/`), |
| 41 | buildhistory |
| 42 | (:yocto_git:`/cgit.cgi/poky-buildhistory/`), and |
| 43 | our sstate up to date. On the weekend, there is a master-next build |
| 44 | instead to ensure the test results are updated for the less frequently |
| 45 | run targets. |
| 46 | |
| 47 | Performance builds (buildperf-\* targets in the console) are triggered |
| 48 | separately every six hours and automatically push their results to the |
| 49 | buildstats repository at: |
| 50 | :yocto_git:`/cgit.cgi/yocto-buildstats/`. |
| 51 | |
| 52 | The 'quick' targets have been selected to be the ones which catch the |
| 53 | most failures or give the most valuable data. We run 'fast' ptests in |
| 54 | this case for example but not the ones which take a long time. The quick |
| 55 | target doesn't include \*-lsb builds for all architectures, some world |
| 56 | builds and doesn't trigger performance tests or ltp testing. The full |
| 57 | build includes all these things and is slower but more comprehensive. |
| 58 | |
| 59 | Release Builds |
| 60 | ============== |
| 61 | |
| 62 | The project typically has two major releases a year with a six month |
| 63 | cadence in April and October. Between these there would be a number of |
| 64 | milestone releases (usually four) with the final one being stablization |
| 65 | only along with point releases of our stable branches. |
| 66 | |
| 67 | The build and release process for these project releases is similar to |
| 68 | that in `Day to Day Development <#test-daily-devel>`__, in that the |
| 69 | a-full target of the Autobuilder is used but in addition the form is |
| 70 | configured to generate and publish artefacts and the milestone number, |
| 71 | version, release candidate number and other information is entered. The |
| 72 | box to "generate an email to QA"is also checked. |
| 73 | |
| 74 | When the build completes, an email is sent out using the send-qa-email |
| 75 | script in the ``yocto-autobuilder-helper`` repository to the list of |
| 76 | people configured for that release. Release builds are placed into a |
| 77 | directory in https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases on the |
| 78 | Autobuilder which is included in the email. The process from here is |
| 79 | more manual and control is effectively passed to release engineering. |
| 80 | The next steps include: |
| 81 | |
| 82 | - QA teams respond to the email saying which tests they plan to run and |
| 83 | when the results will be available. |
| 84 | |
| 85 | - QA teams run their tests and share their results in the yocto- |
| 86 | testresults-contrib repository, along with a summary of their |
| 87 | findings. |
| 88 | |
| 89 | - Release engineering prepare the release as per their process. |
| 90 | |
| 91 | - Test results from the QA teams are included into the release in |
| 92 | separate directories and also uploaded to the yocto-testresults |
| 93 | repository alongside the other test results for the given revision. |
| 94 | |
| 95 | - The QA report in the final release is regenerated using resulttool to |
| 96 | include the new test results and the test summaries from the teams |
| 97 | (as headers to the generated report). |
| 98 | |
| 99 | - The release is checked against the release checklist and release |
| 100 | readiness criteria. |
| 101 | |
| 102 | - A final decision on whether to release is made by the YP TSC who have |
| 103 | final oversight on release readiness. |