poky/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0001-core-set-fs.file-max-sysctl-to-LONG_MAX-rather-than-.patch

From 6e2f78948403a4cce45b9e34311c9577c624f066 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 10:51:25 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] core: set fs.file-max sysctl to LONG_MAX rather than
 ULONG_MAX

Since kernel 5.2 the kernel thankfully returns proper errors when we
write a value out of range to the sysctl. Which however breaks writing
ULONG_MAX to request the maximum value. Hence let's write the new
maximum value instead, LONG_MAX.

/cc @brauner

Fixes: #12803

Upstream-Status: Backport

Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>
---
 src/core/main.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/core/main.c b/src/core/main.c
index b33ea1b5b5..e7f51815f0 100644
--- a/src/core/main.c
+++ b/src/core/main.c
@@ -1245,9 +1245,9 @@ static void bump_file_max_and_nr_open(void) {
 #endif
 
 #if BUMP_PROC_SYS_FS_FILE_MAX
-        /* I so wanted to use STRINGIFY(ULONG_MAX) here, but alas we can't as glibc/gcc define that as
-         * "(0x7fffffffffffffffL * 2UL + 1UL)". Seriously. 😢 */
-        if (asprintf(&t, "%lu\n", ULONG_MAX) < 0) {
+        /* The maximum the kernel allows for this since 5.2 is LONG_MAX, use that. (Previously thing where
+         * different but the operation would fail silently.) */
+        if (asprintf(&t, "%li\n", LONG_MAX) < 0) {
                 log_oom();
                 return;
         }